Big Tree Cloud Holdings Limited's (NASDAQ:DSY) Most Bullish Insider, CEO Wenquan Zhu Must Be Pleased With the Recent 38% Gain
Big Tree Cloud Holdings Limited's (NASDAQ:DSY) Most Bullish Insider, CEO Wenquan Zhu Must Be Pleased With the Recent 38% Gain
Key Insights
主要見解
- Big Tree Cloud Holdings' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- Wenquan Zhu owns 88% of the company
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- 大樹雲控股公司顯著的內部股東持股表明了對公司擴張的內在利益
- 朱文泉擁有該公司88%的股份
- 所有權研究結合過去的表現數據可以幫助更好地理解股票的機會。
Every investor in Big Tree Cloud Holdings Limited (NASDAQ:DSY) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 88% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
每位在大樹雲控股有限公司(納斯達克:DSY)的投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。持有公司最多股份的群體,準確地說大約佔88%,是個別內部人士。換句話說,該群體從其對公司的投資中可能獲得最多收益(或損失最多)。
As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 38% gain.
因此,內部人士是上週38%漲幅中最大的受益者。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Big Tree Cloud Holdings.
在下面的圖表中,我們聚焦於大樹雲控股的不同所有權集團。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Big Tree Cloud Holdings?
機構持股缺乏對大樹雲控股有什麼啓示?
Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.
機構不擁有股票的原因有多種解釋。最常見的是公司相對於管理基金過小,因此機構不必仔細審查公司。也有可能是基金經理人不持有股票,因爲他們不確信該股票表現良好。機構投資者可能並不認爲該業務的歷史增長令人印象深刻,或者可能有其他因素在起作用。您可以自己看到Zibuyu Group的過去營業收入表現。
There are multiple explanations for why institutions don't own a stock. The most common is that the company is too small relative to funds under management, so the institution does not bother to look closely at the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Big Tree Cloud Holdings' earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.
機構不擁有一隻股票的原因有多種。最常見的原因是該公司的規模相對於管理的所有基金類型而言過小,因此機構不會費心去仔細觀察該公司。另一方面,可能還有一些原因使得機構投資者不願意投資這家公司。大樹雲控股的盈利和營業收入記錄(見下方)可能對機構投資者沒有吸引力——或者他們可能根本沒有仔細審視這項業務。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Big Tree Cloud Holdings. With a 88% stake, CEO Wenquan Zhu is the largest shareholder. This implies that they possess majority interests and have significant control over the company. Investors usually consider it a good sign when the company leadership has such a significant stake, as this is widely perceived to increase the chance that the management will act in the best interests of the company. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 0.1% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 0.02% by the third-largest shareholder.
對沖基金在大樹雲控股的股份不多。首席執行官朱文泉持有88%的股份,是最大的股東。這意味着他們擁有多數權益,並對公司擁有重大控制權。當公司領導層持有如此大的股份時,投資者通常認爲這是一個好兆頭,因爲這被廣泛認爲增加了管理層爲公司利益行事的可能性。爲了提供背景,第二大股東持有約0.1%的流通股份,第三大股東的持股爲0.02%。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但同時調查分析師建議也是很好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。我們目前沒有發現任何關於該公司的分析師報道,因此該公司不太可能被廣泛持有。
Insider Ownership Of Big Tree Cloud Holdings
大樹雲控股的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own the majority of Big Tree Cloud Holdings Limited. This means they can collectively make decisions for the company. So they have a US$144m stake in this US$164m business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們最近的數據表明,大樹雲控股有限公司的高管擁有大部分股份。這意味着他們可以共同做出公司的決策。 因此,他們在這家價值1億6400萬美元的業務中持有1億4400萬美元的股份。看到這種投資水平是很不錯的。你可以在這裏查看這些高管最近是否有買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
普通公衆,包括零售投資者,擁有該公司12%的股權,因此不能被忽視。儘管這種所有權的大小可能不足以爲他們爭取政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 5 warning signs with Big Tree Cloud Holdings (at least 3 which are a bit concerning) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
雖然考慮不同的公司擁有者群體是非常重要的,但還有其他因素更爲關鍵。 比如,時刻存在的投資風險。 我們已識別出大樹雲控股的5個警告信號(至少有3個令人擔憂),理解這些應該是你投資過程的一部分。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. So take a peek at this free free list of interesting companies.
當然,這可能不是最好的購買股票。因此,查看這份免費免費的有趣公司列表可能會有所幫助。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。