Hello Group Inc.'s (NASDAQ:MOMO) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 4.8% Over the Past Week
Hello Group Inc.'s (NASDAQ:MOMO) Large Institutional Owners Must Be Happy as Stock Continues to Impress, up 4.8% Over the Past Week
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Hello Group's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- The top 8 shareholders own 52% of the company
- Insiders own 23% of Hello Group
- 鑑於機構持有該股的大量股份,Hello Group的股價可能容易受到其交易決策的影響
- 前8名股東擁有公司52%的股份
- 內部人士擁有Hello Group23%的股份
A look at the shareholders of Hello Group Inc. (NASDAQ:MOMO) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 57% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看Hello Group Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:MOMO)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有57%所有權的機構。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$1.2b in market cap. The one-year return on investment is currently 12% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
上週,在該公司的市值達到12億美元之後,機構投資者最終受益最大。目前,一年的投資回報率爲12%,上週的收益本來會非常受歡迎。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Hello Group.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關Hello Group的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hello Group?
關於Hello Group,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會對股票更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在冊,尤其是在它們正在成長的情況下。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Hello Group. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Hello Group's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
如您所見,機構投資者在Hello Group中擁有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Hello Group的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hello Group is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Yan Tang with 23% of shares outstanding. J O Hambro Capital Management Limited is the second largest shareholder owning 6.6% of common stock, and Renaissance Technologies LLC holds about 4.9% of the company stock.
由於機構投資者擁有已發行股票的一半以上,董事會可能必須注意他們的偏好。Hello Group 不歸對沖基金所有。從我們的數據來看,我們可以看到最大股東是首席執行官唐巖,已發行股份的23%。J O Hambro Capital Management Limited是第二大股東,擁有6.6%的普通股,Renaissance Technologies LLC持有該公司約4.9%的股份。
We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前8名股東佔股票登記冊的一半以上,少數規模較小的股東可以在一定程度上平衡大股東的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此你可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of Hello Group
Hello Group 的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Hello Group Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful US$273m stake in this US$1.2b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有Hello Group Inc.合理比例的股份。有趣的是,內部人士在這項12億美元的業務中擁有2.73億美元的大量股份。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
With a 20% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Hello Group. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
Hello Group擁有20%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對Hello Group有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Hello Group better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Hello Group , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Hello Group,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,投資風險的幽靈無處不在。我們已經向Hello Group發現了一個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是會成長還是會萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,其中顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。