Graphjet Technology's (NASDAQ:GTI) Chief Scientific Officer Yun Liu Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 12% Last Week
Graphjet Technology's (NASDAQ:GTI) Chief Scientific Officer Yun Liu Is the Most Upbeat Insider, and Their Holdings Increased by 12% Last Week
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Graphjet Technology's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- 57% of the business is held by the top 3 shareholders
- Ownership research, combined with past performance data can help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock
- Graphjet Technology的重大內部所有權表明了公司擴張的固有利益
- 57% 的業務由前三名股東持有
- 所有權研究與過去的表現數據相結合,可以幫助人們更好地了解股票的機會
A look at the shareholders of Graphjet Technology (NASDAQ:GTI) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 54% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看Graphjet Technology(納斯達克股票代碼:GTI)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。個人內部人士擁有54%的股份,是公司的最大股份。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As a result, insiders scored the highest last week as the company hit US$370m market cap following a 12% gain in the stock.
結果,內部人士上週得分最高,該公司的市值在股價上漲12%後達到3.7億美元。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Graphjet Technology.
在下圖中,我們放大了Graphjet科技的不同所有權組。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Graphjet Technology?
關於Graphjet技術,缺乏機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Small companies that are not very actively traded often lack institutional investors, but it's less common to see large companies without them.
交易不太活躍的小公司通常缺少機構投資者,但是沒有機構投資者的大公司並不常見。
There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Graphjet Technology's earnings and revenue track record (below) may not be compelling to institutional investors -- or they simply might not have looked at the business closely.
沒有機構擁有公司股份的原因可能多種多樣。通常,小型的新上市公司不會引起基金經理的太多關注,因爲大型基金經理不可能在公司中建立有意義的地位。或者,該公司的某些方面可能使機構投資者望而卻步。Graphjet Technology的收益和收入記錄(見下文)可能不會吸引機構投資者,或者他們可能根本沒有仔細研究該業務。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Graphjet Technology. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Graphjet Technology's case, its Chief Scientific Officer, Yun Liu, is the largest shareholder, holding 25% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 19% and 14%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Interestingly, the third-largest shareholder, Hooi Lim is also a Chairman of the Board, again, indicating strong insider ownership amongst the company's top shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Ping Wei Lee directly holds 6.0% of the total shares outstanding.
我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Graphjet科技進行有意義的投資。因爲行動勝於雄辯,所以我們認爲當內部人士擁有公司的大量股份時,這是一個好兆頭。就Graphjet Technology而言,其首席科學官劉雲是最大股東,持有25%的已發行股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的19%和14%。有趣的是,第三大股東Hooi Lim也是董事會主席,這再次表明該公司最大股東擁有強大的內部所有權。此外,該公司首席執行官李平偉直接持有已發行股份總額的6.0%。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 57% stake.
對股東登記冊的更詳細研究表明,前三名股東通過其57%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解風向哪個方向吹來也是有意義的。我們的信息表明,分析師對該股沒有任何報道,因此可能鮮爲人知。
Insider Ownership Of Graphjet Technology
Graphjet 技術的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
儘管內部人士的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使其他股東更難追究董事會對決策的責任。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of Graphjet Technology. This gives them effective control of the company. So they have a US$199m stake in this US$370m business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們的信息表明,內部人士擁有Graphjet科技一半以上的股份。這使他們能夠有效控制公司。因此,他們在這筆3.7億美元的業務中擁有199億美元的股份。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
一般公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 28% stake in Graphjet Technology. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Graphjet Technology28%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 19%, of the Graphjet Technology stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
看來私營公司擁有Graphjet Technology19%的股份。僅憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得研究誰擁有這些私營公司。有時,內部人士或其他關聯方通過一家獨立的私人公司對上市公司的股份擁有權益。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Graphjet Technology has 4 warning signs we think you should be aware of.
我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。以風險爲例-Graphjet Technology 有 4 個警告信號,我們認爲您應該注意。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果你更願意去另一家公司看看,一家財務狀況可能更好,那麼千萬不要錯過這份由強勁財務數據支持的有趣公司的免費名單。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。