share_log

Return Trends At Under Armour (NYSE:UAA) Aren't Appealing

Return Trends At Under Armour (NYSE:UAA) Aren't Appealing

紐交所(UAA)安德瑪公司(Under Armour)的回報趨勢並不吸引人
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/05 02:56

There are a few key trends to look for if we want to identify the next multi-bagger. Firstly, we'd want to identify a growing return on capital employed (ROCE) and then alongside that, an ever-increasing base of capital employed. If you see this, it typically means it's a company with a great business model and plenty of profitable reinvestment opportunities. In light of that, when we looked at Under Armour (NYSE:UAA) and its ROCE trend, we weren't exactly thrilled.

如果我們想要識別下一個高回報投資,有幾個關鍵趨勢需要關注。 首先,我們希望識別出資本就業回報率(ROCE)的增長,以及與之相伴的不斷增加的資本就業基礎。如果你看到這些,通常意味着這是一家擁有出色商業模式和豐富盈利再投資機會的公司。 鑑於此,當我們查看Under Armour(紐交所:UAA)及其ROCE趨勢時,我們並不感到興奮。

What Is Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)?

我們對 Enphase Energy 的資本僱用回報率的看法:正如我們上面看到的,Enphase Energy 的資本回報率沒有提高,但它正在重新投資於業務。投資者必須認爲未來會有更好的前景,因爲股票表現良好,使持股五年以上的股東獲得了 690% 的收益。最終,如果基本趨勢持續存在,我們不會對它成爲一隻多頭股持有期很久很有信心。

For those who don't know, ROCE is a measure of a company's yearly pre-tax profit (its return), relative to the capital employed in the business. The formula for this calculation on Under Armour is:

對於那些不太了解的人來說,ROCE是衡量公司年度稅前利潤(回報)與投入業務的資本的比率。 對於Under Armour的這一計算公式是:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

資本利用率 = 利息和稅前利潤(EBIT) ÷ (總資產 - 流動負債)

0.067 = US$221m ÷ (US$4.5b - US$1.2b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).

0.067 = 22100萬美金 ÷ (45億美金 - 12億美金)(基於截至2024年9月的過去十二個月)。

So, Under Armour has an ROCE of 6.7%. In absolute terms, that's a low return and it also under-performs the Luxury industry average of 13%.

因此,Under Armour的ROCE爲6.7%。 從絕對值來看,這是一個低迴報,並且也低於奢侈品行業平均的13%。

big
NYSE:UAA Return on Capital Employed December 4th 2024
紐交所:UAA 資本回報率 2024年12月4日

Above you can see how the current ROCE for Under Armour compares to its prior returns on capital, but there's only so much you can tell from the past. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering Under Armour for free.

上面你可以看到安德瑪當前的資本回報率(ROCE)與其之前的資本回報率的比較,但過去的情況僅能提供有限的信息。如果你願意,可以查看覆蓋安德瑪的分析師的預測,且這一服務是免費的。

So How Is Under Armour's ROCE Trending?

那麼安德瑪的資本回報率(ROCE)走勢如何?

Over the past five years, Under Armour's ROCE and capital employed have both remained mostly flat. Businesses with these traits tend to be mature and steady operations because they're past the growth phase. So unless we see a substantial change at Under Armour in terms of ROCE and additional investments being made, we wouldn't hold our breath on it being a multi-bagger.

在過去五年裏,安德瑪的資本回報率(ROCE)和使用的資本基本保持平穩。擁有這些特徵的企業往往是成熟而穩定的運營,因爲它們已經過了增長階段。因此,除非我們在安德瑪的資本回報率(ROCE)和額外投資方面看到實質性變化,否則我們並不會對其成爲多倍回報抱有希望。

What We Can Learn From Under Armour's ROCE

我們可以從安德瑪的資本回報率(ROCE)中學到什麼

In a nutshell, Under Armour has been trudging along with the same returns from the same amount of capital over the last five years. And in the last five years, the stock has given away 47% so the market doesn't look too hopeful on these trends strengthening any time soon. All in all, the inherent trends aren't typical of multi-baggers, so if that's what you're after, we think you might have more luck elsewhere.

總而言之,安德瑪在過去五年裏以相同的資本獲得相同的回報。而在過去五年裏,股價下跌了47%,市場對這些趨勢能否很快加強並不抱太大希望。總體而言,這些內在趨勢並不典型於多倍回報的股票,因此如果你在尋找這樣的股票,我們認爲你可能在其他地方更有運氣。

If you want to continue researching Under Armour, you might be interested to know about the 1 warning sign that our analysis has discovered.

如果你想繼續研究安德瑪,你可能會對我們的分析發現的一個警示信號感興趣。

For those who like to invest in solid companies, check out this free list of companies with solid balance sheets and high returns on equity.

對於喜歡投資穩健公司的人,請查看這份具有穩健資產負債表和高權益回報的公司免費列表。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論