Should You Be Impressed By BlackLine, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BL) ROE?
Should You Be Impressed By BlackLine, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:BL) ROE?
Many investors are still learning about the various metrics that can be useful when analysing a stock. This article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE). By way of learning-by-doing, we'll look at ROE to gain a better understanding of BlackLine, Inc. (NASDAQ:BL).
許多投資者仍在學習分析股票時可能有用的各種指標。本文針對那些想要學習股本回報率(ROE)的人。通過實踐學習,我們將研究ROE,以更好地理解BlackLine, Inc.(納斯達克:BL)。
Return on equity or ROE is a key measure used to assess how efficiently a company's management is utilizing the company's capital. In short, ROE shows the profit each dollar generates with respect to its shareholder investments.
股東權益回報率(ROE)是用來評估公司管理層如何有效利用公司資本的關鍵指標。簡單來說,ROE顯示了每一美元對股東投資所產生的利潤。
How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?
如何計算股本回報率?
ROE can be calculated by using the formula:
ROE可以通過以下公式計算:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
股東權益回報率 = 淨利潤(來自持續運營)÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for BlackLine is:
因此,根據上述公式,BlackLine的ROE爲:
32% = US$129m ÷ US$398m (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
32% = US$12900萬 ÷ US$39800萬(基於截至2024年9月的過去十二個月)。
The 'return' is the income the business earned over the last year. One way to conceptualize this is that for each $1 of shareholders' capital it has, the company made $0.32 in profit.
「回報」是企業在過去一年賺取的收入。可以這樣理解,對於每1美元的股東資本,公司賺取了0.32美元的利潤。
Does BlackLine Have A Good Return On Equity?
BlackLine的淨資產收益率好嗎?
By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. Importantly, this is far from a perfect measure, because companies differ significantly within the same industry classification. As you can see in the graphic below, BlackLine has a higher ROE than the average (12%) in the Software industry.
通過將公司的ROE與行業平均水平進行比較,我們可以快速衡量其表現。重要的是,這遠非一個完美的指標,因爲同一行業分類下的公司差異顯著。如您在下面的圖形中所見,BlackLine的ROE高於軟件行業的平均水平(12%)。
That's clearly a positive. However, bear in mind that a high ROE doesn't necessarily indicate efficient profit generation. Especially when a firm uses high levels of debt to finance its debt which may boost its ROE but the high leverage puts the company at risk. Our risks dashboardshould have the 2 risks we have identified for BlackLine.
這顯然是一個積極因素。然而,請記住,高ROE不一定表示高效的利潤生成。特別是當一家公司使用高水平的債務來資助其債務時,這可能會提升其ROE,但高槓杆也使公司面臨風險。我們的風險儀表板應該具備我們已經識別出的BlackLine的兩個風險。
The Importance Of Debt To Return On Equity
債務對淨資產收益率的重要性
Most companies need money -- from somewhere -- to grow their profits. That cash can come from retained earnings, issuing new shares (equity), or debt. In the case of the first and second options, the ROE will reflect this use of cash, for growth. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used.
大多數公司需要資金——來自某個地方——來增加其利潤。這筆資金可以來自留存收益、發行新股(股權)或債務。在前兩種情況下,ROE將反映這種用於增長的現金使用。在後一種情況下,用於增長的債務將改善回報,但不會影響總股本。這將使ROE看起來比沒有使用債務時要好。
BlackLine's Debt And Its 32% ROE
BlackLine的負債及其32%的ROE
It's worth noting the high use of debt by BlackLine, leading to its debt to equity ratio of 2.24. Its ROE is pretty impressive but, it would have probably been lower without the use of debt. Investors should think carefully about how a company might perform if it was unable to borrow so easily, because credit markets do change over time.
值得注意的是,BlackLine高負債的使用,導致其負債與股本比率爲2.24。其ROE相當可觀,但如果沒有負債的使用,ROE可能會更低。投資者應認真考慮公司在不能輕鬆借款的情況下可能的表現,因爲信用市場會隨着時間變化。
Summary
總結
Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. In our books, the highest quality companies have high return on equity, despite low debt. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.
股本回報率對於比較不同業務的質量非常有用。在我們的書中,最高質量的公司在負債低的情況下也有高股本回報率。如果兩家公司擁有相似的負債與股本比例,其中一家的ROE更高,我通常會傾向於選擇ROE更高的那家公司。
But ROE is just one piece of a bigger puzzle, since high quality businesses often trade on high multiples of earnings. Profit growth rates, versus the expectations reflected in the price of the stock, are a particularly important to consider. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
但ROE只是更大拼圖的一部分,因爲高質量的企業通常以高倍的收益交易。盈利增長率與股價反映的預期相比,特別重要。因此,我認爲查看這份關於分析師預測的公司免費報告可能值得。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt.
如果你更願意查看另一家公司——一家潛在的財務狀況優秀的公司——那麼一定不要錯過這份有趣公司的免費列表,這些公司有高股本回報率和低負債。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。