LendingClub Corporation's (NYSE:LC) Institutional Investors Lost 3.7% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
LendingClub Corporation's (NYSE:LC) Institutional Investors Lost 3.7% Last Week but Have Benefitted From Longer-term Gains
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies LendingClub's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 16 shareholders
- Insiders have been selling lately
- 顯著的高機構持股意味着lendingclub的股票價格對他們的交易行爲敏感。
- 前16名股東持有該業務50%的股份。
- 內部人員最近一直在賣出。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of LendingClub Corporation (NYSE:LC), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 76% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制lendingclub公司(紐交所:LC),理解業務的所有權結構很重要。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有76%的股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,這個集團將獲得最大的利益(如果出現下跌,將遭受最大損失)。
No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 3.7% in value last week. Still, the 137% one-year gains may have helped mitigate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.
沒有股東喜歡在投資中虧損,特別是看到他們的持股份額在上週下跌了3.7%的機構投資者。儘管如此,137%的年回報率可能幫助他們減輕了整體損失。然而,他們應該警惕未來可能出現的進一步虧損。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of LendingClub, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究LendingClub的每一種股東,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About LendingClub?
機構持股量告訴我們關於LendingClub的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
We can see that LendingClub does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see LendingClub's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到lendingclub確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的一部分。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在它們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這種交易出現問題時,多個方可能會競爭快速出售股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以在下面查看lendingclub的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請注意,事情總是有更多的內幕。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in LendingClub. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 11% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.8% and 5.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. In addition, we found that Scott Sanborn, the CEO has 1.2% of the shares allocated to their name.
機構投資者擁有公司超過50%的股份,因此他們可以共同強烈影響董事會的決策。對沖基金在lendingclub的股份不多。先鋒集團公司目前是最大的股東,擁有11%的流通股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有7.8%和5.7%的流通股份。此外,我們發現首席執行官Scott Sanborn擁有1.2%分配給他名下的股份。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 16 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
我們的所有權數字顯示,前16名股東的所有權總計佔50%,這意味着沒有單一股東佔有多數。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司機構所有權數據是有意義的,但了解分析師的情緒也很有意義,以了解市場的走向。因爲有很多分析師正在跟蹤這個股票,所以看看他們的預測可能是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of LendingClub
LendingClub的內部持股權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
雖然內部人員的具體定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人員。公司管理層應向董事會回答問題,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也會成爲董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can see that insiders own shares in LendingClub Corporation. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$54m. Most would see this as a real positive. It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們可以看到內部人士持有lendingclub公司的股票。內部人士的持股價值達5400萬美元。大多數人會把這視爲一個真正的積極信號。看到內部人士有這樣的投資是好事。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否有買入。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in LendingClub. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有lendingclub 21%的股份。雖然這個持股比例相當可觀,但如果這個決定與其他大股東不同,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - LendingClub has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
我覺得了解到底誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是要真正獲得洞見,我們還需要考慮其他信息。舉個例子,風險 - lendingclub 有 1 個警告信號,我們認爲你應該注意。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。