share_log

Police Can Search Cars For Raw Cannabis Smell, Illinois Supreme Court Says

Police Can Search Cars For Raw Cannabis Smell, Illinois Supreme Court Says

伊利諾伊州最高法院表示,警方可以因聞到生的大麻股氣味而搜查汽車。
Benzinga ·  12/06 06:53

The Illinois Supreme Court has decided that the smell of raw cannabis is enough for police to search a vehicle.

伊利諾伊州最高法院裁定,生大麻的氣味足以讓警察搜查車輛。

The ruling, which contrasts with an earlier decision that the smell of burnt cannabis is not enough for a search, has sparked legal and public debate over how cannabis laws are applied in the state, the Chicago Tribune reported.

據《芝加哥論壇報》報道,該裁決與先前作出的關於燒過的大麻的氣味不足以進行搜查的決定形成鮮明對比,引發了關於該州如何適用大麻法律的法律和公衆辯論。

Two Cases, Two Different Outcomes

兩個案例,兩種不同的結果

The decision stems from a case involving Vincent Molina, a passenger in a car stopped for speeding on I-88 near the Illinois-Iowa border in December 2020.

該決定源於一起涉及文森特·莫利納的案件,文森特·莫利納是一輛因在伊利諾伊州-愛荷華州邊境附近的I-88上超速行駛而被攔住的汽車的乘客。

A state trooper claimed to smell cannabis through the open window, prompting a search that uncovered several joints and cannabis stored in a sealed box. While Illinois legalized small amounts of cannabis in 2020, Molina was charged with improper transport for not using an odor-proof container.

一名州警聲稱透過敞開的窗戶聞到了大麻的味道,這促使他們進行搜查,發現了幾個關節和存放在密封盒子裏的大麻。雖然伊利諾伊州在2020年將少量大麻合法化,但莫利納因未使用防臭容器而被指控犯有不當運輸罪。

Initially, a court ruled the search unjustified. However, an appeals court reversed that decision, leading to the state Supreme Court's involvement. The court ruled that the smell of raw cannabis strongly suggests a violation of Illinois law, which requires cannabis in vehicles to be stored in an odor-proof container.

最初,法院裁定搜查不合理。但是,上訴法院推翻了該裁決,導致州最高法院介入。法院裁定,生大麻的氣味強烈表明違反了伊利諾伊州法律,該法律要求將車輛中的大麻存放在防臭容器中。

In a separate case heard by the court, People v. Ryan Redmond, the justices ruled that the smell of burnt cannabis doesn't justify a vehicle search, as it could simply indicate prior use outside the vehicle.

在法院審理的另一起案件,即 「人民訴瑞安·雷德蒙德」 案中,法官裁定,燒焦的大麻的氣味不能成爲搜查車輛的理由,因爲它可能只是表明以前曾在車外使用過。

Confusion Over Legal Standards

對法律標準的困惑

This split in rulings has drawn criticism. Justice Mary K. O'Brien, joined by Chief Justice Mary Jane Theis, dissented in the Molina case. "It makes no sense to treat raw cannabis as more probative when the odor of burnt cannabis may suggest recent use, whereas the odor of raw cannabis does not suggest consumption," O'Brien wrote.

這種裁決分歧引起了批評。瑪麗·奧布萊恩大法官以及首席大法官瑪麗·簡·泰斯在莫利納案中持異議。奧布賴恩寫道:「當燒過的大麻的氣味可能表明最近使用過大麻時,將生大麻視爲更具證明性的做法是沒有意義的,而生大麻的氣味並不意味着食用。」

Meanwhile, defense attorney James Mertes, stated: "This means that the privacy rights of motorists in Illinois have been turned over to the police officer's sense of smell," Mertes said. He plans to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.

同時,辯護律師詹姆斯·默特斯表示:「這意味着伊利諾伊州駕車者的隱私權已移交給警官的嗅覺,」 默特斯說。他計劃就該裁決向美國最高法院提出上訴。

A Legislative Puzzle

立法難題

Adding to the confusion, Illinois lawmakers previously removed the odor-proof container requirement from the cannabis legalization law but left it in the vehicle code. The state Supreme Court suggested this legal mismatch needs fixing.

更令人困惑的是,伊利諾伊州立法者此前從大麻合法化法中刪除了集裝箱的防臭要求,但將其保留在了車輛法規中。州最高法院表示,這種法律不匹配需要解決。

"I am discouraged by the Illinois Supreme Court's decision, but I am encouraged to now ask that this matter be decided by the United States Supreme Court," Molina said in a statement.

莫利納在一份聲明中說:「我對伊利諾伊州最高法院的裁決感到沮喪,但我現在要求美國最高法院對此事作出裁決,這讓我感到鼓舞。」

  • Is Weed Worse Than Alcohol For Driving? New Study Challenges Common DUI Assumptions
  • 開車時大麻比酒精更糟糕嗎?新研究挑戰了常見的酒後駕車假設

Cover image made with AI.

使用 AI 製作的封面圖片。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論