JA Solar Technology (SZSE:002459) Use Of Debt Could Be Considered Risky
JA Solar Technology (SZSE:002459) Use Of Debt Could Be Considered Risky
Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We can see that JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002459) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
傳奇基金經理李錄(得到查理·芒格支持)曾經說過:'最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是你是否會遭受永久性資本損失。'所以看起來,聰明的投資者知道,債務(通常涉及破產)是評估一家公司風險程度時的一個非常重要因素。我們可以看到,晶澳科技股份有限公司(SZSE:002459)在業務中確實使用了債務。但是這筆債務會讓股東擔心嗎?
Why Does Debt Bring Risk?
爲什麼債務會帶來風險?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. However, a more frequent (but still costly) occurrence is where a company must issue shares at bargain-basement prices, permanently diluting shareholders, just to shore up its balance sheet. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.
當企業無法通過自由現金流或以有利價格募資來輕鬆履行債務和其他負債時,債務和其他負債對企業就會構成風險。資本主義的一部分是「創意毀滅」的過程,其中銀行家們無情地清算失敗的企業。然而,更頻繁但仍然昂貴的情況是公司必須以基準價格發行股票來穩定其資產負債表,從而永久性地稀釋股東。當然,對於資本密集型企業,債務可能是一個重要的工具。當我們考慮一家公司的債務使用時,我們首先會看現金和債務的總和。
How Much Debt Does JA Solar Technology Carry?
晶澳科技承擔多少債務?
As you can see below, at the end of September 2024, JA Solar Technology had CN¥40.8b of debt, up from CN¥15.1b a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it also had CN¥24.2b in cash, and so its net debt is CN¥16.6b.
如下圖所示,截至2024年9月底,晶澳科技的債務總額達到408億元人民幣,比一年前的151億元人民幣有所增加。點擊圖片查看更多細節。不過,它也持有242億元人民幣現金,因此其淨債務爲166億元人民幣。
How Healthy Is JA Solar Technology's Balance Sheet?
晶澳科技的資產負債表有多健康?
Zooming in on the latest balance sheet data, we can see that JA Solar Technology had liabilities of CN¥49.8b due within 12 months and liabilities of CN¥34.1b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had CN¥24.2b in cash and CN¥11.2b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling CN¥48.5b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
深入研究最新的資產負債表數據,我們可以看到晶澳科技的負債中,有498億人民幣是在12個月內到期的,341億人民幣是在12個月後到期的。與此相抵,它手頭有242億人民幣現金和112億人民幣的應收款項,在12個月內到期。因此,它的負債總計超過現金和短期應收款項的組合485億人民幣。
This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of CN¥54.0b. Should its lenders demand that it shore up the balance sheet, shareholders would likely face severe dilution.
相對於其540億人民幣的市值,這是一座巨大的槓桿山。如果其債權人要求它加強資產負債表,股東很可能面臨嚴重的稀釋。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
Service Corporation International的債務是其EBITDA的3.5倍,而其EBIT可覆蓋其利息開支的3.7倍。綜合考慮,雖然我們不希望看到債務水平上升,但我們認爲它可以應對當前的槓桿。好消息是,Service Corporation International在過去12個月中將其EBIT提高了2.9%,從而逐漸降低了其相對於收益的債務水平。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中獲得了有關債務的大部分內容。但是,相對於資產負債表,更重要的是未來收益,這將決定Service Corporation International維持健康資產負債表的能力。如果您關注未來,您可以查看此免費報告,其中有分析師的利潤預測。
While JA Solar Technology's debt to EBITDA ratio (3.8) suggests that it uses some debt, its interest cover is very weak, at 0.76, suggesting high leverage. In large part that's due to the company's significant depreciation and amortisation charges, which arguably mean its EBITDA is a very generous measure of earnings, and its debt may be more of a burden than it first appears. It seems clear that the cost of borrowing money is negatively impacting returns for shareholders, of late. Even worse, JA Solar Technology saw its EBIT tank 99% over the last 12 months. If earnings keep going like that over the long term, it has a snowball's chance in hell of paying off that debt. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine JA Solar Technology's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
儘管晶澳科技的債務/息稅折舊攤銷前利潤(EBITDA)比率爲3.8,表明它使用了一些債務,但其利息償付倍數非常弱,爲0.76,表明其槓桿率很高。在很大程度上,這是由於公司的大額折舊和攤銷費用導致的,這意味着其EBITDA可能是一項非常慷慨的收益指標,而其債務可能比看上去更加沉重。顯然,借錢的成本對股東的回報產生了負面影響。更糟糕的是,晶澳科技在過去12個月中看到其EBIT銳減99%。如果收益在長期保持這樣下去,那麼償還債務的機會微乎其微。當分析債務時,重點顯然是在資產負債表這一方面。但最終關鍵還取決於未來收益,而不僅僅是這些,將決定晶澳科技未來能否維持健康的資產負債表。因此,如果你關注未來,可以查看這份免費報告,顯示分析師的盈利預測。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. During the last three years, JA Solar Technology burned a lot of cash. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.
最後,雖然稅務人員可能喜歡會計利潤,但放貸人只接受冷硬現金。因此,邏輯的下一步是看那些EBIt的比例實際上有多少與自由現金流匹配。在過去三年裏,晶澳科技燒掉了大量現金。雖然這可能是爲了增長而支出的結果,但確實增加了債務的風險。
Our View
我們的觀點
To be frank both JA Solar Technology's conversion of EBIT to free cash flow and its track record of (not) growing its EBIT make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. And even its level of total liabilities fails to inspire much confidence. After considering the datapoints discussed, we think JA Solar Technology has too much debt. That sort of riskiness is ok for some, but it certainly doesn't float our boat. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for JA Solar Technology (2 can't be ignored!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
坦率地說,晶澳科技從EBIt轉爲自由現金流以及其(不)增長EBIt的記錄讓我們對其債務水平感到不安。即使其總負債水平也沒有激發太多信心。在考慮討論過的數據點之後,我們認爲晶澳科技負債過多。這種風險對於某些人來說是可以接受的,但對我們來說確實不合適。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是明顯的起點。然而,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中 - 遠非如此。例如,我們已經發現了晶澳科技的3個警示信號(其中有2個不能被忽視!),在開始投資之前,您應該了解這些。
If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.
如果在所有這些之後,您更感興趣的是具有堅實資產負債表的快速增長公司,那麼不要拖延,查看我們的淨現金增長股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。