Goertek Inc.'s (SZSE:002241) Top Owners Are Individual Investors With 54% Stake, While 17% Is Held by Insiders
Goertek Inc.'s (SZSE:002241) Top Owners Are Individual Investors With 54% Stake, While 17% Is Held by Insiders
Key Insights
主要見解
- Significant control over Goertek by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 43% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders
- 17% of Goertek is held by insiders
- 個別投資者對國光的重大控制意味着公衆對管理和治理相關決策有更多影響力。
- 前25名股東持有43%的業務。
- 17%的國光股份由內部人士持有。
Every investor in Goertek Inc. (SZSE:002241) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that individual investors own the lion's share in the company with 54% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
每位在國光股份有限公司(SZSE:002241)的投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,個別投資者擁有該公司54%的股份,換句話說,該群體從他們對公司的投資中獲得的收益(或損失)最大。
Individual insiders, on the other hand, account for 17% of the company's stockholders. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time.
另一方面,內部人士佔公司股東的17%。一般來說,隨着公司的發展,機構會增加他們的持股比例。相反,內部人士通常會隨着時間的推移減少他們的持股。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Goertek.
讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於歌爾科技的信息。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Goertek?
機構持股對我們了解歌爾科技的意義是什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
Goertek already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Goertek's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
歌爾科技的股東名冊中已經有機構參與。確實,他們在公司的持股比例相當可觀。這在一定程度上表明瞭專業投資者的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果多個機構同時對某隻股票的看法發生變化,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,有必要看看下面歌爾科技的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。

Goertek is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Goertek Group Company Limited with 15% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.4% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.3% by the third-largest shareholder.
歌爾股份並不被對沖基金持有。根據我們的數據顯示,最大的股東是歌爾集團有限公司,持有15%的流通股份。爲了提供背景,第二大股東持有約8.4%的流通股份,第三大股東則持有7.3%的股份。
Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.
我們的研究表明,前25大股東共控制了公司股份的不到一半,這意味着公司的股份廣泛分散,沒有主導股東。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Goertek
歌爾的內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Goertek Inc.. Insiders own CN¥14b worth of shares in the CN¥86b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最近的數據表明,內部聯繫人擁有合理比例的歌爾股份有限公司股份。內部聯繫人持有價值140億元人民幣的股份,而該公司價值860億元人民幣。這是相當重要的。大多數人會說,這表明與股東有良好的一致性,尤其是在這樣規模的公司中。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部聯繫人是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public -- including retail investors -- own 54% of Goertek. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
公衆,包括零售投資者,持有54%的歌爾股份。這種規模的所有權賦予公衆投資者一定的集體權力。他們可以並可能會影響高管薪酬、股息政策和擬議的業務收購的決定。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司的所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 15%, of the Goertek stock. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
似乎有15%的高德克股票被私人公司持有。單憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得調查一下這些私人公司的股東。有時,內部人員或其他相關方通過一家獨立的私人公司持有一家上市公司的股份。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Goertek you should be aware of.
我覺得了解一家公司究竟由誰擁有非常有趣。但要真正獲得深入的見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。舉個例子:我們發現了1個關於高德克的警示信號,你應該知道。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。