share_log

With 79% Ownership in DraftKings Inc. (NASDAQ:DKNG), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

With 79% Ownership in DraftKings Inc. (NASDAQ:DKNG), Institutional Investors Have a Lot Riding on the Business

擁有draftkings公司(納斯達克:DKNG)79%股份的機構投資者在該業務上有很大投入
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/06 18:21

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, DraftKings' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
  • 51% of the business is held by the top 24 shareholders
  • Insiders have been selling lately
  • 考慮到機構在股票中持有大量股份,DraftKings的股價可能會受到它們交易決定的影響
  • 業務的51%由前24名股東持有
  • 內部人員最近一直在賣出。

A look at the shareholders of DraftKings Inc. (NASDAQ:DKNG) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 79% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

查看DraftKings Inc.(納斯達克:DKNG)的股東可以告訴我們哪個群體最具影響力。 機構持有公司最大股份的79%。 也就是說,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲益最多(或者如果出現下行,則損失最大)。

Last week's 4.2% gain means that institutional investors were on the positive end of the spectrum even as the company has shown strong longer-term trends. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 27%.

上週的漲幅爲4.2%,意味着機構投資者處於正面區域,即使公司展現出強勁的長期趨勢。上週的收益還將進一步提升股東的一年回報率,目前爲27%。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of DraftKings, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入研究draftkings的每一類股東,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqGS:DKNG Ownership Breakdown December 6th 2024
納斯達克股票交易所:DKNG 2024年12月6日所有權分佈

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About DraftKings?

機構持股告訴我們有關draftkings的什麼信息?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。

DraftKings already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see DraftKings' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

draftkings已經在股東名冊上擁有機構投資者。事實上,他們在公司擁有可觀的股份。這可能表明公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽度。然而,依賴於機構投資者所謂的驗證是最好持謹慎態度的。他們也有時犯錯。當多家機構擁有一支股票時,總會存在他們進行'擁擠交易'的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多方可能競相快速拋售股票。在一家沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以查看draftkings的歷史收益和營業收入,但謹記故事還有更多內容。

big
NasdaqGS:DKNG Earnings and Revenue Growth December 6th 2024
納斯達克納斯達克GS : draftkings 盈利和營業收入增長 2024年12月6日

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in DraftKings. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 8.7%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 6.4% and 4.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Additionally, the company's CEO Jason Robins directly holds 0.5% of the total shares outstanding.

由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要注意他們的偏好。對DraftKings而言,對沖基金持有的股份並不多。該公司最大的股東是The Vanguard Group, Inc.,擁有8.7%的所有權。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的6.4%和4.7%。此外,公司的CEO傑森·羅賓斯直接持有總已發行股份的0.5%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 24 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股東登記冊,我們可以看到前24位股東控制了51%的股份,這意味着沒有任何單一股東在所有權中擁有多數權益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

我們的數據表明,私人公司持有公司的4.0%的股份。單單從這個事實上很難得出任何結論,因此它值得研究誰擁有這些私人公司。有時內部人或其他相關方通過單獨的私營公司持有上市公司的股份。

Insider Ownership Of DraftKings

draftkings 內部財產所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,經理們成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in DraftKings Inc.. Insiders own US$460m worth of shares (at current prices). Most would say this shows a good alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們的最新數據顯示,內部人員擁有DraftKings股票。 內部人員持有價值46000萬美元的股份(按目前價格計算)。 大多數人會認爲這表明股東與董事會之間存在良好的利益一致性。 不過,也許值得檢查一下這些內部人員是否一直在出售股份。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 19% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

一般公衆,包括散戶投資者,在該公司擁有19%的股份,因此不容忽視。雖然這個群體不能決定大局,但它肯定會對公司的經營產生實際影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with DraftKings , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

儘管考慮到擁有公司的不同群體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,永遠存在的投資風險。我們已經發現了draftkings的1個警告信號,理解它們應該成爲您投資過程的一部分。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論