Individual Investors Who Own 50% Along With Institutions Invested in ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:CHPT) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week
Individual Investors Who Own 50% Along With Institutions Invested in ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:CHPT) Saw Increase in Their Holdings Value Last Week
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by individual investors in ChargePoint Holdings indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- A total of 25 investors have a majority stake in the company with 40% ownership
- Recent sales by insiders
- 個人投資者在ChargePoint Holdings中的大量持股表明,他們在管理和業務策略上有更大的發言權。
- 25家投資者持有公司的多數股權,佔有40%的所有權。
- 最近由內部人士出售。
Every investor in ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:CHPT) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 50% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.(紐交所代碼:CHPT)的每位投資者都應該意識到最強大的股東群體。 持有最大份額的群體是擁有50%股份的個人投資者。也就是說,如果股票上漲,他們將受益最多(反之,如果股票下跌,他們將損失最多)。
Individual investors gained the most after market cap touched US$538m last week, while institutions who own 40% also benefitted.
當市值上週觸及53800萬美元時,散戶投資者獲得了最多的收益,持有40%的機構同樣也受益。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of ChargePoint Holdings, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討ChargePoint Holdings每種所有者類型,從下圖開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ChargePoint Holdings?
機構持有率告訴我們關於ChargePoint Holdings什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
We can see that ChargePoint Holdings does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of ChargePoint Holdings, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到ChargePoint Holdings確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司相當大一部分的股票。這意味着那些機構的分析師對該股票進行了研究,並且他們對其表示認可。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果兩家大型機構投資者同時試圖賣出一隻股票,出現大幅股價下跌並不罕見。因此,查閱ChargePoint Holdings的歷史業績走勢是值得的(見下文)。當然,也要記住還有其他因素需要考慮。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in ChargePoint Holdings. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 8.8% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.2% and 6.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
我們注意到對ChargePoint Holdings的對沖基金投資不顯著。我們的歷史數據表明,先鋒集團是最大的股東,持有8.8%的流通股。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有7.2%和6.2%的流通股。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of ChargePoint Holdings
ChargePoint Holdings 的內部持有情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.. As individuals, the insiders collectively own US$8.5m worth of the US$538m company. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人士在ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.中持有一些股份。內部人士總共持有價值850萬美元的股份,這相當於53800萬美元的公司。這顯示出至少有一些一致性。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a substantial 50% stake in ChargePoint Holdings, suggesting it is a fairly popular stock. This level of ownership gives investors from the wider public some power to sway key policy decisions such as board composition, executive compensation, and the dividend payout ratio.
公衆,通常是個人投資者,在ChargePoint Holdings中持有50%的股份,這表明這是一隻相當受歡迎的股票。這種所有權水平使廣泛公衆的投資者有一定的權力影響關鍵的政策決策,比如董事會構成、執行薪酬和股息支付比例。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With an ownership of 6.0%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
擁有6.0%股權的股權投資公司有能力在塑造企業策略方面發揮作用,重點放在價值創造上。有些人可能會喜歡這一點,因爲股權投資有時是會讓管理層對公司負責的激進分子。但是其他時候,股權投資公司可能是在卸貨,將公司上市。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for ChargePoint Holdings that you should be aware of.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司不同團體是很重要的,但還有其他因素更爲重要。 例如,我們已經識別出ChargePoint Holdings的3個警告信號,您需要注意。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。