share_log

Individual Investors Who Have a Significant Stake Must Be Disappointed Along With Institutions After Pagaya Technologies Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:PGY) Market Cap Dropped by US$54m

Individual Investors Who Have a Significant Stake Must Be Disappointed Along With Institutions After Pagaya Technologies Ltd.'s (NASDAQ:PGY) Market Cap Dropped by US$54m

在Pagaya Technologies Ltd.(納斯達克:PGY)的市值下降了5400萬美元后,持有重要股份的個人投資者和機構必定感到失望。
Simply Wall St ·  12/07 09:49

Key Insights

主要見解

  • Pagaya Technologies' significant individual investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • The top 10 shareholders own 51% of the company
  • Insiders have sold recently
  • Pagaya Technologies的重大個人投資者持股表明,關鍵決策受到更大公衆股東的影響。
  • 前十大股東擁有該公司51%的股份。
  • 近期內有內部人士出售股票

If you want to know who really controls Pagaya Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ:PGY), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 31% to be precise, is individual investors. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

如果你想知道誰真正控制Pagaya Technologies Ltd.(納斯達克:PGY),那麼你需要查看其股東名冊的組成。持有公司最多股票的群體,具體來說,大約佔31%,是個人投資者。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

While the holdings of individual investors took a hit after last week's 6.7% price drop, institutions with their 28% holdings also suffered.

雖然個人投資者的持有在上週6.7%的價格下跌後受到了衝擊,但持有28%的機構也遭受了損失。

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Pagaya Technologies, beginning with the chart below.

讓我們深入探討一下Pagaya Technologies的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。

big
NasdaqCM:PGY Ownership Breakdown December 7th 2024
納斯達克CM:PGY 擁有情況分解 2024年12月7日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Pagaya Technologies?

機構擁有情況告訴我們關於Pagaya Technologies什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Pagaya Technologies. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Pagaya Technologies' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

正如你所看到的,機構投資者在Pagaya Technologies中具有相當可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經關注到這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能會犯錯。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在它們處於『擁擠交易』的風險。當這樣的交易出現問題時,多個參與者可能會競爭快速出售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Pagaya Technologies的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,總有更深入的故事。

big
NasdaqCM:PGY Earnings and Revenue Growth December 7th 2024
納斯達克CM:PGY 盈利與營業收入增長 2024年12月7日

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Pagaya Technologies. The company's largest shareholder is Viola Group, with ownership of 11%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 7.5% and 6.9%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Gal Krubiner, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

我們注意到對Pagaya Technologies的對沖基金沒有顯著投資。該公司的最大股東是Viola Group,擁有11%的股份。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有7.5%和6.9%的流通股份。第三大股東Gal Krubiner也恰好擔任董事會成員的職務。

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

我們進一步了解到,前10大股東持有通富微電大約51%的註冊資本,這意味着除了大股東,還有一些小股東,能夠在某種程度上平衡彼此的利益。

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議也是一個好習慣,以深入了解股票的預期表現。有許多分析師對這支股票進行了覆蓋,因此了解他們的預測可能值得一試。

Insider Ownership Of Pagaya Technologies

Pagaya Technologies的內部持股

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且在不同的司法管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少捕捉到董事會成員的記錄。公司管理人員向董事會報告,後者應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高級管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。

It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Pagaya Technologies Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just US$753m, and insiders have US$142m worth of shares in their own names. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

似乎內部人士擁有Pagaya Technologies Ltd.的相當大比例股份。它的市值僅爲75300萬美金,而內部人士名下的股份價值14200萬美金。這可能表明創始人仍然持有大量股份。您可以點擊這裏查看他們是否有在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

一般大衆所有權

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 31% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

普通公衆——包括散戶投資者——擁有該公司31%的股份,因此不能輕易忽略它們。這種所有權規模雖然很大,但如果決策與其他大股東不一致,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Equity Ownership

股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。

Private equity firms hold a 19% stake in Pagaya Technologies. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

股權投資公司持有Pagaya Technologies 19%的股份。這表明他們在關鍵政策決策中可能具有影響力。一些人可能會喜歡這種情況,因爲股權投資有時是積極的,他們會讓管理層負責。但在其他時候,股權投資則可能會出賣公司,因爲他們已經將公司上市。

Private Company Ownership

私有公司的所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 3.7%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

我們可以看到,私人公司持有發行股份的3.7%。僅憑這個事實很難得出任何結論,所以值得研究一下這些私人公司的股東情況。有時內部人員或其他相關方可能通過一個獨立的私人公司持有公共公司的股份。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Pagaya Technologies better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Pagaya Technologies has 3 warning signs (and 1 which is a bit unpleasant) we think you should know about.

考慮一下擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但爲了更好地理解Pagaya Technologies,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。以風險爲例——Pagaya Technologies有3個警告信號(還有1個稍微令人不快的),我們認爲你應該了解這些。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

最終,未來最重要。您可以在這份關於該公司分析師預測的免費報告中獲取有關信息。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論