Shanghai STEP Electric Corporation (SZSE:002527) Surges 9.8%; Retail Investors Who Own 56% Shares Profited Along With Insiders
Shanghai STEP Electric Corporation (SZSE:002527) Surges 9.8%; Retail Investors Who Own 56% Shares Profited Along With Insiders
Key Insights
主要見解
- The considerable ownership by retail investors in Shanghai STEP Electric indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 25 shareholders own 44% of the company
- Insiders own 41% of Shanghai STEP Electric
- 上海新時達的散戶投資者持有大量股份,表明他們在管理和業務策略中具有更大的發言權。
- 前25名股東擁有公司44%的所有權。
- 內部人士持有新時達41%的股份。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Shanghai STEP Electric Corporation (SZSE:002527), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 56% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制了上海新時達(深交所代碼:002527),重要的是要理解該業務的所有權結構。我們可以看到散戶投資者在公司中擁有56%的股份。這意味着,如果股票上漲,該群體將獲得最多利益(如果發生下跌,他們將失去最多)。
Retail investors gained the most after market cap touched CN¥7.5b last week, while insiders who own 41% also benefitted.
在市值達到75億人民幣的上週,散戶投資者獲得了最多收益,而擁有41%股份的內部人士也受到益處。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Shanghai STEP Electric, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討一下新時達的每一種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai STEP Electric?
機構持股情況對新時達的啓示是什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時會針對一個基準進行衡量,因此一旦某隻股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會更加熱衷於該股票。我們預計大多數公司都會有一些機構在登記簿上,尤其是那些正在增長的公司。
Institutions have a very small stake in Shanghai STEP Electric. That indicates that the company is on the radar of some funds, but it isn't particularly popular with professional investors at the moment. So if the company itself can improve over time, we may well see more institutional buyers in the future. It is not uncommon to see a big share price rise if multiple institutional investors are trying to buy into a stock at the same time. So check out the historic earnings trajectory, below, but keep in mind it's the future that counts most.
機構在新時達的持股比例非常小。這表明該公司受到一些基金的關注,但目前並不是專業投資者特別青睞的對象。因此,如果公司能夠隨着時間的推移而改善,我們可能會在未來看到更多的機構買入者。如果多個機構投資者同時嘗試購買股票,股價大幅上漲並不罕見。請查看下面的歷史業績軌跡,但請記住,未來更爲重要。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shanghai STEP Electric. The company's largest shareholder is Defa Ji, with ownership of 24%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 5.4% and 4.2% of the stock.
對沖基金在新時達的持股很少。該公司的最大股東是馮大池,持股比例爲24%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約5.4%和4.2%的股票。
On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.
經過我們的所有權數據研究,我們發現前25位股東共同擁有不到50%的股份,表明沒有任何個人擁有多數利益。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
儘管研究一家公司的機構所有權可以爲您的研究增添價值,但研究分析師建議以深入了解股票的預期表現也是一個好的做法。我們的信息表明,該股票沒有任何分析師的覆蓋,因此可能爲人所知甚少。
Insider Ownership Of Shanghai STEP Electric
新時達的內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲它可以表示董事會與其他股東的利益相一致。但是,在某些場合下,這個團體的權力過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Shanghai STEP Electric Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥7.5b, and insiders have CN¥3.1b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有新時達合理比例的股份。它的市值僅爲75億人民幣,而內部人士名下擁有價值31億人民幣的股票。這是相當重要的。大多數人都會高興地看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望查看此免費圖表,顯示內部人士最近的交易情況。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public -- including retail investors -- own 56% of Shanghai STEP Electric. This size of ownership gives investors from the general public some collective power. They can and probably do influence decisions on executive compensation, dividend policies and proposed business acquisitions.
公衆一般,包括零售投資者,擁有新時達56%的股份。這種股權規模賦予公衆投資者一定的集體權力。他們可以,並且可能會影響有關高管薪酬、股息政策和擬議業務收購的決策。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 1 warning sign for Shanghai STEP Electric you should know about.
我發現查看誰真正擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。 比如考慮風險。每家公司都有風險,我們發現了一個你應該知道的新時達的警告信號。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
當然,您可能會在其他地方找到一項出色的投資。因此,請查看此免費的有趣公司列表。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。