We Think City Developments (SGX:C09) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt
We Think City Developments (SGX:C09) Is Taking Some Risk With Its Debt
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. We can see that City Developments Limited (SGX:C09) does use debt in its business. But is this debt a concern to shareholders?
有些人認爲波動性而不是債務是投資者評估風險的最佳方式,但禾倫·巴菲特曾著名地說過『波動性遠非與風險同義詞。』當你檢查一家公司有多大風險時,自然會考慮其資產負債表,因爲在企業倒閉時,債務往往會涉及其中。我們可以看到城市發展公司(新加坡交易所:C09)在其業務中確實使用了槓桿。但這債務對股東來說是個問題嗎?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
Debt assists a business until the business has trouble paying it off, either with new capital or with free cash flow. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
債務在業務遇到困難無法償還時會提供幫助,無論是通過新資本還是通過自由現金流。最終,如果公司無法履行償還債務的法律義務,股東可能什麼也得不到。然而,一種更常見(但仍昂貴)的情況是,公司必須以較低的股價稀釋股東,以便簡單地控制債務。然而,通過取代稀釋,債務對於那些需要資本以高回報率投資增長的企業來說是一種極好的工具。考慮公司的債務水平時的第一步是將其現金和債務合併考慮。
What Is City Developments's Net Debt?
城市發展的淨債務是多少?
The image below, which you can click on for greater detail, shows that at June 2024 City Developments had debt of S$12.1b, up from S$10.3b in one year. On the flip side, it has S$1.94b in cash leading to net debt of about S$10.2b.
下圖可點擊查看詳細信息,顯示到2024年6月,城市發展公司的債務爲121億新元,較一年前的103億新元有所增加。另一方面,它擁有19.4億新元現金,因此淨債務約爲102億新元。
How Strong Is City Developments' Balance Sheet?
城發展公司的資產負債表有多強?
According to the last reported balance sheet, City Developments had liabilities of S$4.71b due within 12 months, and liabilities of S$10.4b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of S$1.94b as well as receivables valued at S$2.42b due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by S$10.7b.
根據最後報告的資產負債表,城發展公司的負債爲47.1億新元,需在12個月內償還,而104億新元的負債將在12個月後到期。爲了抵消這些義務,它擁有19.4億新元的現金以及24.2億新元的應收賬款,需在12個月內收回。因此,公司的負債超過現金和(近期)應收賬款的總和107億新元。
The deficiency here weighs heavily on the S$4.73b company itself, as if a child were struggling under the weight of an enormous back-pack full of books, his sports gear, and a trumpet. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. At the end of the day, City Developments would probably need a major re-capitalization if its creditors were to demand repayment.
這裏的缺口對471億新元的公司來說影響巨大,就像一個孩子揹着裝滿書籍的巨大揹包、運動裝備和喇叭一樣艱難。因此,我們無疑會密切關注它的資產負債表。在一天結束時,如果其債權人要求還款,城發展公司可能需要進行大規模再融資。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我們使用兩個主要比率來了解債務相對於收入的水平。首先是淨債務除以利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前利潤(EBITDA),而第二個是其稅前利潤(EBIT)可以覆蓋利息支出的倍數(或簡稱爲利息覆蓋率)。 這種方法的優勢在於我們既考慮了債務的絕對量(淨債務與EBITDA)又考慮了與該債務相關的實際利息支出(利息覆蓋比)。
Weak interest cover of 1.2 times and a disturbingly high net debt to EBITDA ratio of 13.6 hit our confidence in City Developments like a one-two punch to the gut. The debt burden here is substantial. On the other hand, City Developments grew its EBIT by 26% in the last year. If it can maintain that kind of improvement, its debt load will begin to melt away like glaciers in a warming world. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if City Developments can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
1.2倍的利息保障倍數和13.6的高淨債務對EBITDA比率對城發展公司的信心就像一記重拳。這裏的債務負擔相當沉重。另一方面,城發展公司在過去一年中將EBIT增長了26%。如果它能夠保持這種改善,其債務負擔將開始像溫暖世界中的冰川一樣慢慢消融。在分析債務時,資產負債表顯然是重點關注的領域。但最終,業務的未來盈利能力將決定城發展公司能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的看法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. Over the last three years, City Developments actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. That sort of strong cash generation warms our hearts like a puppy in a bumblebee suit.
最後,企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤根本不夠。 所以我們顯然需要看看EBIT是否導致了相應的自由現金流。 在過去三年中,城市發展公司實際上產生的自由現金流超過了EBIT。 這種強勁的現金生成讓我們的心像穿着大黃蜂服裝的小狗一樣溫暖。
Our View
我們的觀點
To be frank both City Developments's interest cover and its track record of staying on top of its total liabilities make us rather uncomfortable with its debt levels. But at least it's pretty decent at converting EBIT to free cash flow; that's encouraging. Looking at the balance sheet and taking into account all these factors, we do believe that debt is making City Developments stock a bit risky. Some people like that sort of risk, but we're mindful of the potential pitfalls, so we'd probably prefer it carry less debt. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. These risks can be hard to spot. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for City Developments (of which 1 is significant!) you should know about.
坦率地說,城市發展公司的利息覆蓋率以及其在總負債上保持領先的記錄讓我們對其債務水平感到相當不安。 但至少它在將EBIT轉化爲自由現金流方面表現得相當不錯;這令人鼓舞。 從資產負債表來看,考慮到所有這些因素,我們確實認爲債務使城市發展公司的股票有點風險。 有些人喜歡這種風險,但我們意識到潛在的陷阱,所以我們可能更希望它能減少債務。 在分析債務水平時,資產負債表顯然是一個開始的地方。 但是,並非所有投資風險都存在於資產負債表中——遠非如此。 這些風險有時難以察覺。 每個公司都有這些風險,我們已經發現了城市發展公司的2個警示信號(其中1個是重要的!)你應該知道。
Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today.
當然,如果您是那種喜歡購買沒有債務負擔的股票的投資者,那麼不要猶豫,立即發現我們獨家的淨現金增長股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。