Positive Week for Rubrik, Inc. (NYSE:RBRK) Institutional Investors Who Control 34% of the Company
Positive Week for Rubrik, Inc. (NYSE:RBRK) Institutional Investors Who Control 34% of the Company
Key Insights
主要見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Rubrik implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- A total of 6 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership
- Recent sales by insiders
- 機構在Rubrik的重大持股意味着他們對公司股價有顯著影響
- 共有6名投資者擁有該公司的多數股權,擁有50%的所有權。
- 最近由內部人士出售。
If you want to know who really controls Rubrik, Inc. (NYSE:RBRK), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 34% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道誰真正控制Rubrik,Inc. (紐交所:RBRK),那麼你需要查看其股份登記的組成。持有公司最多股份的群體,大約佔34%,是機構。換句話說,該群體面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
Clearly, institutional investors benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by US$2.5b last week.
顯然,機構投資者在公司市值上週上漲25億美元后受益最多。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Rubrik.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Rubrik的信息。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cb78/1cb7867d5f77dbcc13ab3d5805dfc30f71778f7d" alt="big"
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Rubrik?
機構持股告訴我們有關 Rubrik 的什麼事情?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Rubrik already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Rubrik's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Rubrik已經在股份登記中有機構。事實上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的可信度。但我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果多個機構同時對某隻股票改變看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得查看Rubrik的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是最重要的。
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6ea7/b6ea7fee192b00991029f962086c7e788a096184" alt="big"
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Rubrik. Our data shows that Lightspeed Ventures, LLC is the largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 11% and 6.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Bipul Sinha, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chairman of the Board.
我們注意到對Rubrik並沒有顯著的對沖基金投資。我們的數據表明,Lightspeed Ventures, LLC是最大的股東,持有17%的在外流通股票。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有11%和6.8%的在外流通股票。第三大股東Bipul Sinha同時擔任董事會主席的職務。
We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前6大股東持有超過一半的股份登記簿,有一些較小的股東來平衡較大股東的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然仔細研究公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師對該股票的看法也是有意義的。有相當數量的分析師在跟蹤該股票,因此了解他們對於未來發展的總體看法可能會有所幫助。
Insider Ownership Of Rubrik
Rubrik的內部所有權
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
在不同國家,內部人員的定義可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終是內部人員。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,如果管理人員是創始人或CEO,那麼成爲執行董事會成員也是很常見的。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人士持股是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,它會使其他股東更難以對董事會的決定進行問責。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Rubrik, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$12b, and insiders have US$2.4b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
我們的信息表明,內部人士在Rubrik, Inc.中保持着顯著的持有。其市值僅爲120億美元,內部人士名下持有價值24億美元的股票。這相當可觀。大多數人會高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您可能希望查看這張顯示內部人士最近交易的免費圖表。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 18% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
我覺得看看誰擁有公司很有趣。但是,要真正獲得洞察力,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,風險 - 江蘇澤宇智能動力股份有限公司有2個警告標誌(1個非常重要),我們認爲您應該知道。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
Private equity firms hold a 28% stake in Rubrik. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
股權投資公司持有Rubrik 28%的股份。這表明他們在關鍵政策決策中可能具有影響力。有時我們看到股權投資會長期關注,但一般來說,他們的投資時間較短,正如其名字所示,他們不太會投資於公共公司。在一段時間後,他們可能會尋求賣出並在其他地方重新投資資本。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Rubrik (including 1 which is concerning) .
雖然考慮不同的擁有公司群體是非常值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。因此,你應該了解我們發現的Rubrik的三個警示信號(包括一個令人擔憂的信號)。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定該業務所有者將獲得多大利益的是未來而非過去。因此,我們認爲最好查看此免費報告,以了解分析師是否預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。