Institutional Investors Control 50% of Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. (NYSE:YMM) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 6.9%
Institutional Investors Control 50% of Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. (NYSE:YMM) and Were Rewarded Last Week After Stock Increased 6.9%
Key Insights
主要見解
- Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Full Truck Alliance's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions
- A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Insiders own 10% of Full Truck Alliance
- 鑑於機構對該股票的巨大持股,滿幫的股價可能會受到他們交易決策的影響。
- 共有13位投資者持有該公司51%的所有權。
- 內部人員持有滿幫10%的股份。
A look at the shareholders of Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd. (NYSE:YMM) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 50% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
查看滿幫股份有限公司(紐交所:YMM)的股東,可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。持有最大份額的集團是機構,擁有50%的股份。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And as as result, institutional investors reaped the most rewards after the company's stock price gained 6.9% last week. One-year return to shareholders is currently 54% and last week's gain was the icing on the cake.
因此,機構投資者在公司股價上週上漲6.9%後獲得了豐厚的回報。目前股東的年度回報率爲54%,而上週的漲幅更是錦上添花。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Full Truck Alliance, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入了解滿幫的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Full Truck Alliance?
機構所有權告訴我們關於滿幫的什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買包括在相關基準指數中的較大公司。
Full Truck Alliance already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Full Truck Alliance's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
滿幫已經在股份登記中有機構投資者。實際上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這在專業投資者中表明瞭一定的信譽。但是,我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像所有人一樣。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在他們在「擁擠交易」中的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多個參與者可能會競爭快速賣出股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。您可以看到滿幫的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,事情的真相遠不止如此。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Full Truck Alliance. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is SB Investment Advisers (UK) Limited with 13% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 10% and 5.3% of the stock. Hui Zhang, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會很可能需要關注他們的偏好。我們注意到對滿幫的對沖基金沒有進行有意義的投資。根據我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是Sb Investment Advisers (UK) Limited,擁有13%的流通股份。相比之下,第二大和第三大的股東分別持有約10%和5.3%的股票。第二大股東Hui Zhang同時也是首席執行官。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 13 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
從股東登記冊上看,13大股東控制了51%的股權,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有這一股權的大多數利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和過濾股票預期性能的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒,也可以實現同樣的效果。很多分析師都在關注該股票,看看他們的預測值得不值得。
Insider Ownership Of Full Truck Alliance
滿幫的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然「內部人士」的明確定義具有主觀性,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理業務,但首席執行官即使是董事會成員,也要向董事會負責。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部人持股情況表明領導層思考和公司真正所有者一樣時,內部所有權是積極的。然而,高達內部人士所有權也可能爲公司內的小團體帶來巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Full Truck Alliance Co. Ltd.. Insiders own US$1.2b worth of shares in the US$11b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有滿幫股份有限公司合理比例的股份。內部人士在這家估值110億美元的公司中擁有價值12億美元的股票。這相當有意義。多數人會說,這顯示出與股東之間的良好一致性,尤其是在這樣規模的公司中。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
一般大衆所有權
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 21% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
包括零售投資者在內的公衆持有該公司21%的股份,因此不能被輕易忽視。雖然這種所有權比例可能不足以使決策有利於他們,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
Private equity firms hold a 18% stake in Full Truck Alliance. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
股權投資公司持有滿幫18%的股份。這表明他們在關鍵政策決策中可能具有影響力。有時我們會看到股權投資持有較長時間,但一般而言,他們的投資視野較短,正如名稱所示,他們在公開公司中投資較少。在一段時間後,他們可能會考慮賣出並將資本重新部署到其他地方。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我覺得查看公司的實際所有者非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察力,我們需要考慮其他信息。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問該互動圖表,了解其過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果您像我一樣,可能希望考慮這家公司是否會增長或縮小。幸運的是,您可以查看此免費報告,顯示分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注:本文中的數據是使用最後一個財務報表日期結束的爲期12個月的數據計算的。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?對內容感到擔憂嗎?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至editorial-team @ simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St的這篇文章是一般性質的。我們僅基於歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,使用公正的方法,我們的文章並非意在提供財務建議。這並不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,並且不考慮您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您帶來基於基礎數據驅動的長期聚焦分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St對提及的任何股票都沒有持倉。