share_log

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE:EMR) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 79% of the Company

Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE:EMR) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 79% of the Company

愛默生電氣公司(紐交所:EMR)受到機構投資者的青睞,他們持有公司79%的股份
Simply Wall St ·  2024/12/09 10:11

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Emerson Electric implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
  • The top 25 shareholders own 47% of the company
  • Recent sales by insiders
  • 機構在艾默生電氣的重大持股意味着他們對公司的股價具有顯著影響。
  • 前25大股東擁有公司47%的股份。
  • 高管近期的賣出行爲

Every investor in Emerson Electric Co. (NYSE:EMR) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 79% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

每位艾默生電氣公司(紐交所:EMR)的投資者都應了解最強大的股東群體。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有79%的股份,換句話說,那個群體將從他們對公司的投資中獲益最多(或損失最多)。

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

由於機構投資者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往會產生很大的影響,尤其是對個人投資者。因此,在一家公司中擁有相當數量的機構資金投資,通常被視爲一個值得稱讚的特徵。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Emerson Electric.

在下圖中,我們放大艾默生電氣的不同所有權集團。

big
NYSE:EMR Ownership Breakdown December 9th 2024
紐交所:EMR 所有權分佈 2024年12月9日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Emerson Electric?

機構持有情況對艾默生電氣有什麼啓示?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Emerson Electric. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Emerson Electric's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.

正如您所見,機構投資者在艾默生電氣中擁有相當的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的可信度。然而,最好小心依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。它們有時也會犯錯。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得關注艾默生電氣的歷史數據。 當然,未來才是最重要的。

big
NYSE:EMR Earnings and Revenue Growth December 9th 2024
紐交所:艾默生電氣 盈利和營業收入增長 2024年12月9日

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Emerson Electric. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 9.3% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.3% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.5% by the third-largest shareholder.

投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司的超過一半的股份,因此他們可以共同施加顯著的影響力。我們注意到對艾默生電氣的對沖基金沒有進行實質性的投資。先鋒集團當前是最大的股東,持有9.3%的流通股。爲了提供背景,第二大股東持有大約6.3%的流通股,第三大股東則持有4.5%的股份。

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

通過研究我們的持股數據,我們發現前25大股東共同持有的股份少於50%,這意味着沒有任何個人擁有多數股權。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

研究機構持股是評估和篩選股票預期表現的一個好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現這一點。相當多的分析師覆蓋該股票,因此您可以很容易地查看預測增長情況。

Insider Ownership Of Emerson Electric

艾默生電氣的內部股東持股情況

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內幕人的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內幕人。公司的管理層向董事會負責,而董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。

Our information suggests that Emerson Electric Co. insiders own under 1% of the company. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$256m of stock. It is good to see board members owning shares, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

我們的信息顯示,艾默生電氣公司的內部人士持有公司不到1%的股份。由於公司規模龐大,我們並不期望內部人士擁有較大比例的股票。總的來說,他們擁有的股票價值爲25600萬美元。看到董事會成員持有股票是件好事,但可能值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否有在購買。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in Emerson Electric. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

公衆一般是指個人投資者,他們在艾默生電氣中持有21%的股份。雖然這個群體不一定能掌控大局,但他們確實可以對公司的運行產生真正的影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Emerson Electric better, we need to consider many other factors. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Emerson Electric you should be aware of.

考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但要更好地理解艾默生電氣,我們還需要考慮許多其他因素。 例如:我們發現了艾默生電氣的3個警告信號,您應該注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論