Private Companies Who Hold 42% of Great Eagle Holdings Limited (HKG:41) Gained 5.8%, Insiders Profited as Well
Private Companies Who Hold 42% of Great Eagle Holdings Limited (HKG:41) Gained 5.8%, Insiders Profited as Well
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Great Eagle Holdings' significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- 64% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
- 29% of Great Eagle Holdings is held by insiders
- 偉鷹控股的大量私營公司所有權表明,關鍵決策受到大股東的影響。
- 64%的業務由前兩大股東持有。
- 29%的偉鷹控股由內部人士持有。
Every investor in Great Eagle Holdings Limited (HKG:41) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 42% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
在大鷹控股有限公司(HKG:41)的每位投資者都應意識到最強大的股東團體。我們可以看到,私人公司在該公司的持有比例高達42%。也就是說,如果股價上漲,該團體將受益最多(或者如果市場下跌,他們將損失最多)。
While private companies were the group that reaped the most benefits after last week's 5.8% price gain, insiders also received a 29% cut.
儘管私營公司是在上週5.8%價格上漲後獲益最多的一群,但內部人士也獲得了29%的分成。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Great Eagle Holdings.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了偉鷹控股的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Great Eagle Holdings?
機構所有權告訴我們偉鷹控股什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Great Eagle Holdings. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Great Eagle Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在偉 eagle 控股中持有相當的股份。 這可能表明該公司在投資社區中具有一定的信譽。然而,最好對依賴機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證保持警惕。他們有時也會出錯。如果多個機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,您可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得看看偉 eagle 控股的歷史收益情況。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Great Eagle Holdings. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Lo Family Trust with 42% of shares outstanding. With 22% and 5.5% of the shares outstanding respectively, Ka Shui Lo and DJE Kapital AG are the second and third largest shareholders. Ka Shui Lo, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
對沖基金在偉鷹控股的股份並不多。根據我們的數據,最大股東是羅家信託,持有42%的流通股份。其次是羅家瑞,持有22%的股份,DJE Kapital AG持有5.5%的股份,分別爲第二和第三大股東。第二大股東羅家瑞也恰好擔任首席執行官的職務。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 2 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前兩大股東在公司中擁有大多數股權,這意味着他們有足夠的權力影響公司的決策。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.
研究機構持股是評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。了解分析師情緒也可以達到同樣的效果。根據我們所了解,目前沒有關於該公司的分析師覆蓋,因此它可能正在被忽視。
Insider Ownership Of Great Eagle Holdings
大鷹控股的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人士的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同法域之間有所不同。我們的數據顯示個人內部人士,至少捕獲了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員本身就是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Great Eagle Holdings Limited. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful HK$2.5b stake in this HK$8.5b business. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
我們的信息顯示,內部人士在大鷹控股有限公司持有大量股份。看到內部人士在這個價值85億港元的業務中擁有意義重大的25億港元股份非常有趣。大多數人會欣慰地看到董事會在與他們一起投資。您可能想查看這張展示內部人士近期交易的免費圖表。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 17% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆,包括散戶投資者,持有該公司17%的股份,因此不能輕易被忽視。雖然這樣的持股比例可能不足以在政策決策中影響他們的利益,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 42%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們可以看到,私人公司持有42%的發行股份。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時候,內部人士通過持有私人公司的股份而對一家上市公司產生利益,而不是以個人身份。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意的是這可能是進一步研究的一個領域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Great Eagle Holdings (1 is significant!) that you should be aware of before investing here.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司不同群體的情況非常重要,但還有其他因素更爲關鍵。 例如,我們發現了大鷹控股的兩個警示信號(其中一個非常嚴重!)在您投資之前應該注意。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
當然,您也可能會在其他地方找到一個絕佳的投資。請查看這個免費的有趣公司名單。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。