With a 40% Stake, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (NYSE:ZTO) Insiders Have a Lot Riding on the Company
With a 40% Stake, ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (NYSE:ZTO) Insiders Have a Lot Riding on the Company
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in ZTO Express (Cayman)'s growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Institutions own 30% of ZTO Express (Cayman)
- 內部人士似乎對中通快遞(開曼)的增長有既得利益,這從他們的可觀持有量中可見一斑。
- 共有5位投資者在公司中擁有51%的控股權。
- 機構持有中通快遞(開曼)30%的股份。
If you want to know who really controls ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc. (NYSE:ZTO), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 40% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道誰真正控制了中通快遞(開曼)公司(紐交所:ZTO),那麼你需要查看其股東名冊的構成。而擁有最大那一塊蛋糕的則是持有40%股份的個別內部人士。換句話說,集團面臨着最大的上漲潛力(或下跌風險)。
So, insiders of ZTO Express (Cayman) have a lot at stake and every decision they make on the company's future is important to them from a financial point of view.
因此,中通快遞(開曼)的內部人士有很多利害關係,他們對公司未來所做的每一個決策在財務上對他們來說都很重要。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about ZTO Express (Cayman).
讓我們更仔細地看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於中通快遞(開曼)的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About ZTO Express (Cayman)?
機構持股對中通快遞(開曼)意味着什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
ZTO Express (Cayman) already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see ZTO Express (Cayman)'s historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
中通快遞(開曼)在股東名冊上已經有了機構。實際上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這可以表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的可信度。然而,最好謹慎對待依賴於機構投資者所帶來的所謂驗證。他們有時也會犯錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在他們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這種交易出錯時,多個參與方可能會爭相快速出售股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到中通快遞(開曼)的歷史收入和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是還有更多。
ZTO Express (Cayman) is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is the CEO Meisong Lai with 26% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.4% and 8.1% of the stock.
中通快遞(開曼)並不被對沖基金所擁有。根據我們的數據,最大股東是首席執行官賴美松,持有26%的流通股份。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約8.4%和8.1%的股票。
On looking further, we found that 51% of the shares are owned by the top 5 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.
進一步調查發現,前五大股東持有51%的股份。換句話說,這些股東在公司的決策中擁有重要的話語權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是評估和過濾股票預期表現的一個好方法。通過研究分析師情緒也可以實現同樣的效果。有許多分析師關注該股票,因此查看他們的預測也可能值得。
Insider Ownership Of ZTO Express (Cayman)
中通快遞(開曼)的內部人員持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的法律管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。公司的管理層向董事會負責,而董事會應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員本身也在董事會中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部人持股是一種積極的現象,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東的利益高度一致。然而,在某些情況下,這個群體內的權力可能過於集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$15b, and insiders have US$5.9b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
內部人士似乎擁有中通快遞(開曼)有限公司相當大比例的股份。它的市值僅爲150億美元,而內部人士擁有價值59億美元的股票。這相當可觀。大多數人會說,這顯示了與股東之間良好的對齊關係,尤其是在這樣規模的公司中。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否有買入或賣出的行爲。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 21% stake in ZTO Express (Cayman). While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有中通快遞(開曼)21%的股份。雖然這一群體不一定能夠左右決策,但他們確實可以對公司的運行產生真正的影響。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
It appears to us that public companies own 8.4% of ZTO Express (Cayman). It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.
我們發現公開公司持有中通快遞(開曼)8.4%的股份。很難確定,但這表明他們之間有交織的業務利益。這可能是一種戰略性股份,因此值得關注這一領域的所有權變化。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too.
我覺得研究到底是誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜歡深入研究一家公司過去的表現。您可以在此詳細圖表中找到歷史營業收入和收益。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。