share_log

After a Year of 1.7% Returns, Ardelyx, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ARDX) Share Price Drop Last Week May Have Less of an Impact on Institutional Investors

After a Year of 1.7% Returns, Ardelyx, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:ARDX) Share Price Drop Last Week May Have Less of an Impact on Institutional Investors

在經歷了1.7%的回報的一年後,Ardelyx, Inc.(納斯達克:ARDX)上週股價的下跌可能對機構投資者的影響不大。
Simply Wall St ·  12/10 06:31

Key Insights

關鍵洞察

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Ardelyx's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • The top 21 shareholders own 50% of the company
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 顯著的高機構持股意味着Ardelyx的股票價格對他們的交易行爲敏感
  • 前21大股東持有公司50%的股份
  • 內部人士最近一直在買入

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Ardelyx, Inc. (NASDAQ:ARDX), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 62% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

要了解Ardelyx, Inc.(納斯達克:ARDX)真正的控制權,了解公司的所有權結構是很重要的。我們可以看到,機構在公司中擁有62%的股份。從某種意義上說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最大收益(或遭受最大損失)。

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$64m last week. However, the 1.7% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

機構投資者在公司市值上週下降6400萬美元后遭受了最大損失。然而,1.7%的年回報可能幫助減輕了他們的整體損失。然而,他們應該關注未來可能的進一步損失。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Ardelyx.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於Ardelyx的事情。

big
NasdaqGM:ARDX Ownership Breakdown December 10th 2024
納斯達克GM:ARDX 所有權分解 2024年12月10日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Ardelyx?

機構持股告訴我們關於Ardelyx的什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。

We can see that Ardelyx does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Ardelyx's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到Ardelyx確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司股票的很大一部分。這表明在專業投資者中存在一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在他們處於「擁擠交易」的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競爭快速賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Ardelyx的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,故事總是比這更復雜。

big
NasdaqGM:ARDX Earnings and Revenue Growth December 10th 2024
納斯達克GM:ARDX 2024年12月10日的盈利和營業收入增長

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Ardelyx. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Janus Henderson Group plc with 10% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 7.5% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 5.7% by the third-largest shareholder.

投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此他們可以集體擁有重大權力。對沖基金在Ardelyx中的股份不多。從我們的數據來看,最大股東是Janus Henderson Group plc,擁有10%的流通股。爲便於理解,第二大股東持有大約7.5%的流通股,第三大股東持有5.7%的股份。

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 21 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

我們對所有權數據的深入分析表明,前21大股東的總持股達到50%,意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數股份。

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

研究機構持股是評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以達到同樣的效果。覆蓋該股票的分析師數量相對合理,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有幫助。

Insider Ownership Of Ardelyx

Ardelyx的內部人持股

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終是包括在內的。管理層最終對董事會負責。不過,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

當內幕所有權表明領導者像真正的公司所有者那樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高內幕所有權也可能賦予公司內部小集團巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。

We can report that insiders do own shares in Ardelyx, Inc.. The insiders have a meaningful stake worth US$32m. Most would see this as a real positive. Most would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. Still, it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

我們可以報告,內部人士確實擁有Ardelyx, Inc.的股票。內部人士的股份總值爲3200萬美元。大多數人認爲這是一個真實的積極因素。大多數人會說這顯示了股東與董事會之間的利益一致性。不過,值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否在出售股票。

General Public Ownership

公衆持股

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 36% stake in Ardelyx. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

公衆,一般來說是個體投資者,在Ardelyx中持有36%的股份。雖然這種規模的所有權可能不足以影響政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Next Steps:

下一步:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Ardelyx better, we need to consider many other factors. Take risks for example - Ardelyx has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

始終值得考慮擁有一家公司股票的不同群體。但要更好地理解Ardelyx,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。 以風險爲例 - Ardelyx有1個警告信號,我們認爲您應該注意。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論