Qiagen N.V. (NYSE:QGEN) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 82%
Qiagen N.V. (NYSE:QGEN) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 82%
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Qiagen's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- 50% of the business is held by the top 18 shareholders
- Insiders have sold recently
- 顯著的高機構持股意味着Qiagen的股票價格對其交易行爲非常敏感。
- 前18大股東持有50%的業務。
- 內部人士最近出售了股票。
A look at the shareholders of Qiagen N.V. (NYSE:QGEN) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 82% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
觀察Qiagen N.V.(紐交所代碼:QGEN)的股東,能讓我們了解哪個群體最強大。持有公司最多股份的群體,具體來說約爲82%,是機構。換句話說,該群體面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Given the vast amount of money and research capacities at their disposal, institutional ownership tends to carry a lot of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
考慮到他們掌握的巨額資金和研究能力,機構持股往往具有重要影響力,特別是在個人投資者中。因此,投資於公司的大部分機構資金通常是對其未來的巨大信任投票。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Qiagen, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討Qiagen的每種類型的股東,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Qiagen?
機構持股告訴我們關於Qiagen什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
Qiagen already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Qiagen's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Qiagen已經在股東名冊上有機構投資者。事實上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這可以表明公司在投資界具有一定的可信度。然而,最好小心依賴來自機構投資者的所謂驗證。他們有時也會出錯。如果多個機構同時對一隻股票改變看法,您可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,查看下面Qiagen的盈利歷史是值得的。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Qiagen. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Wellington Management Group LLP with 9.6% of shares outstanding. With 8.8% and 8.1% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and Massachusetts Financial Services Company are the second and third largest shareholders.
投資者應注意,機構實際上擁有公司超過一半的股份,因此它們可以共同擁有顯著的權力。 我們注意到對凱基安的對沖基金並沒有顯著的投資。 通過查看我們的數據,我們可以看到最大的股東是威靈頓管理集團,擁有9.6%的流通股。 貝萊德公司和馬薩諸塞金融服務公司分別以8.8%和8.1%的股份成爲第二和第三大股東。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 18 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
仔細查看我們的所有權數據,前18大股東的合併持股比例達到了50%,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有絕對多數。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究公司的機構持股可以爲您的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一種良好的做法,以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。許多分析師覆蓋此股票,因此您可以很容易地查看預測增長。
Insider Ownership Of Qiagen
Qiagen的內部人持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員始終被算作內部人。管理層最終向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,特別是當他們是創始人或首席執行官時。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Qiagen N.V.. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$44m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人士持有的Qiagen N.V.股票不足1%。由於它是一家大公司,我們僅期望內部人士持有其小部分股份。但值得注意的是,他們擁有價值4400萬美元的股份。看到至少有一些內部人士持有股份總是好的,但可能需要檢查這些內部人士是否在賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 17% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Qiagen. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
一般公衆持有17%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,他們在Qiagen上有一定的影響力。雖然這份股份可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Qiagen that you should be aware of before investing here.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體是非常重要的,但還有其他因素更加重要。 例如,我們發現了3個關於Qiagen的警示信號,您在此投資前應注意這些。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。