Tiptree Inc.'s (NASDAQ:TIPT) Largest Shareholder, Top Key Executive Michael Barnes Sees Holdings Value Fall by 6.1% Following Recent Drop
Tiptree Inc.'s (NASDAQ:TIPT) Largest Shareholder, Top Key Executive Michael Barnes Sees Holdings Value Fall by 6.1% Following Recent Drop
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Tiptree's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
- Institutional ownership in Tiptree is 40%
- Tiptree顯著的內部持股表明對公司擴展的固有利益
- 共有5位投資者持有該公司的多數股權,持股比例爲53%
- Tiptree的機構持股爲40%
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Tiptree Inc. (NASDAQ:TIPT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 42% to be precise, is individual insiders. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正控制了Tiptree Inc.(納斯達克:TIPT),理解該業務的持股結構非常重要。持有公司最多股份的團體,具體來說,約爲42%,是個人內部人員。換句話說,該團體的投資最可能獲得最大收益(或損失)。
As a result, insiders as a group endured the highest losses after market cap fell by US$52m.
因此,內部人士作爲一個整體在市值下降5200萬美元后遭受了最大的損失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Tiptree, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入研究Tiptree的每種所有者類型,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Tiptree?
機構所有權對Tiptree意味着什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Tiptree. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Tiptree's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
正如您所看到的,機構投資者在Tiptree中擁有相當的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師看過這隻股票並且喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。當多個機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在他們參與'擁擠交易'的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多個參與方可能會競相迅速賣出股票。在沒有增長曆史的公司中,這種風險更高。您可以在下面看到Tiptree的歷史盈利和營業收入,但請記住,背後總還有更多的故事。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Tiptree. Because actions speak louder than words, we consider it a good sign when insiders own a significant stake in a company. In Tiptree's case, its Top Key Executive, Michael Barnes, is the largest shareholder, holding 27% of shares outstanding. With 9.5% and 6.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, Arif Inayatullah and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Jonathan Ilany directly holds 4.2% of the total shares outstanding.
對沖基金在Tiptree的股份不多。因爲行動勝於言辭,當內部人士擁有公司顯著股份時,我們認爲這是一個好兆頭。在Tiptree的情況下,公司的首席執行官Michael Barnes是最大的股東,持有27%的流通股。Arif Inayatullah和Dimensional Fund Advisors LP分別是第二和第三大股東,持有9.5%和6.8%的流通股。此外,公司的CEO Jonathan Ilany直接持有總流通股的4.2%。
Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 53% of the company is controlled by the top 5 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.
我們的研究還揭示了一個事實,即大約53%的公司由前五大股東控制,這表明這些股東對業務有顯著的影響力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
雖然研究公司的機構持股可以爲你的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的推薦也是一個好的做法,可以更深入地了解股票的預期表現。我們的信息表明,該股票沒有任何分析師覆蓋,因此可能不爲人知。
Insider Ownership Of Tiptree
Tiptree的內部持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同的法律管轄區之間有所不同。我們的數據反映了個人內部人員,至少包括董事會成員。公司的管理層向董事會負責,而董事會應該代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員本身也在董事會中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內幕所有權表明領導者像真正的公司所有者那樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高內幕所有權也可能賦予公司內部小集團巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Tiptree Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$814m, and insiders have US$341m worth of shares in their own names. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
看起來內部人士擁有Tiptree Inc.的相當大比例股份。它的市值僅爲81400萬美元,而內部人士名下的股票價值達到34100萬美元。我們可以說這顯示出與股東的利益一致,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然相當小;一些內部人士可能是公司的創始人。您可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 18% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Tiptree. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公衆持有18%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對Tiptree有一定程度的影響力。雖然這個群體可能無法主導決策,但顯然可以對公司的運行產生真正影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Tiptree better, we need to consider many other factors.
考慮擁有公司股票的不同群體始終是值得思考的。但要更好地理解Tiptree,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜歡深入研究一家公司過去的表現。您可以在此詳細圖表中找到歷史營業收入和收益。
Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.
當然,這可能不是買入的最佳股票。因此,您可能希望查看我們免費的有趣前景集合,擁有良好的財務狀況。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。