Crown Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:CCK) Delivered A Weaker ROE Than Its Industry
Crown Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:CCK) Delivered A Weaker ROE Than Its Industry
One of the best investments we can make is in our own knowledge and skill set. With that in mind, this article will work through how we can use Return On Equity (ROE) to better understand a business. We'll use ROE to examine Crown Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:CCK), by way of a worked example.
我們可以做出的最佳投資之一就是投資於自己的知識和技能。考慮到這一點,本文將探討如何利用淨利潤率(ROE)更好地理解一項業務。我們將通過實例使用ROE來分析皇冠控股公司(紐交所:CCK)。
ROE or return on equity is a useful tool to assess how effectively a company can generate returns on the investment it received from its shareholders. In other words, it is a profitability ratio which measures the rate of return on the capital provided by the company's shareholders.
ROE或股本回報率是一個有用的工具,用於評估公司如何有效地產生來自股東投資的回報。換句話說,這是一種盈利能力比率,測量公司股東提供的資本的回報率。
How Do You Calculate Return On Equity?
如何計算股本回報率?
The formula for return on equity is:
股東權益回報率的公式是:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
股東權益回報率 = 淨利潤(來自持續運營)÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Crown Holdings is:
根據上述公式,皇冠控股的ROE爲:
8.1% = US$246m ÷ US$3.0b (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
8.1% = 24600萬美元 ÷ 30億美金(基於截至2024年9月的過去十二個月)。
The 'return' refers to a company's earnings over the last year. So, this means that for every $1 of its shareholder's investments, the company generates a profit of $0.08.
'回報'是指公司在過去一年的收益。因此,這意味着對於每1美元的股東投資,公司產生0.08美元的利潤。
Does Crown Holdings Have A Good ROE?
皇冠控股的ROE好嗎?
By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. However, this method is only useful as a rough check, because companies do differ quite a bit within the same industry classification. If you look at the image below, you can see Crown Holdings has a lower ROE than the average (13%) in the Packaging industry classification.
通過比較公司的ROE與其行業平均水平,我們可以快速評估其表現。然而,這種方法僅作爲粗略檢查有用,因爲在同一行業分類中公司的差異相當大。如果你查看下面的圖片,你會看到皇冠控股的ROE低於包裝行業分類的平均水平(13%)。
Unfortunately, that's sub-optimal. Although, we think that a lower ROE could still mean that a company has the opportunity to better its returns with the use of leverage, provided its existing debt levels are low. When a company has low ROE but high debt levels, we would be cautious as the risk involved is too high. Our risks dashboard should have the 4 risks we have identified for Crown Holdings.
不幸的是,這並不理想。雖然我們認爲較低的ROE仍然可能意味着公司有機會通過使用槓桿來改善其回報,前提是其現有債務水平較低。當一家公司ROE低但債務水平高時,我們會保持謹慎,因爲這涉及的風險過高。我們的風險儀表板應有我們爲皇冠控股識別的四個風險。
How Does Debt Impact Return On Equity?
債務如何影響淨利潤回報率?
Virtually all companies need money to invest in the business, to grow profits. That cash can come from issuing shares, retained earnings, or debt. In the case of the first and second options, the ROE will reflect this use of cash, for growth. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. Thus the use of debt can improve ROE, albeit along with extra risk in the case of stormy weather, metaphorically speaking.
幾乎所有公司都需要資金來投資於業務,以實現利潤增長。這筆現金可以通過發行股票、留存收益或債務來獲得。在前兩種情況下,ROE將反映這種現金的使用,以促進增長。在後一種情況下,用於增長的債務將改善回報,但不會影響總股本。因此,使用債務可以提高ROE,儘管在風雨交加的情況下,這會伴隨着額外的風險,打個比方。
Crown Holdings' Debt And Its 8.1% ROE
皇冠控股的債務及其8.1%的ROE
It's worth noting the high use of debt by Crown Holdings, leading to its debt to equity ratio of 2.47. The combination of a rather low ROE and significant use of debt is not particularly appealing. Debt increases risk and reduces options for the company in the future, so you generally want to see some good returns from using it.
值得注意的是皇冠控股高額的債務使用,導致其債務權益比爲2.47。相對較低的ROE和顯著的債務使用組合並不是特別吸引人。債務增加了風險,減少了公司未來的選擇,因此一般希望看到使用債務能帶來一些良好的回報。
Summary
總結
Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. A company that can achieve a high return on equity without debt could be considered a high quality business. If two companies have the same ROE, then I would generally prefer the one with less debt.
股本回報率對於比較不同企業的質量非常有用。能夠在沒有債務的情況下實現高回報率的公司,可以被視爲高質量的企業。如果兩家公司有相同的ROE,我通常會更傾向於債務較少的那家公司。
But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. Profit growth rates, versus the expectations reflected in the price of the stock, are a particularly important to consider. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
但是,當一家企業質量高時,市場往往會將其價格推高,反映出這一點。利潤增長率與股票價格中反映的預期相比,尤其重要。因此,我認爲查看這份有關分析師預測的免費報告可能值得。
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt.
如果你更願意查看另一家公司——一家潛在的財務狀況優秀的公司——那麼一定不要錯過這份有趣公司的免費列表,這些公司有高股本回報率和低負債。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。