share_log

Is PHINIA (NYSE:PHIN) Using Too Much Debt?

Is PHINIA (NYSE:PHIN) Using Too Much Debt?

PHINIA(紐交所:PHIN)是否使用了過多的債務?
Simply Wall St ·  12/11 21:38

Warren Buffett famously said, 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. As with many other companies PHINIA Inc. (NYSE:PHIN) makes use of debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

禾倫·巴菲特曾說過一句名言:「波動性遠非風險的代名詞。」當我們考慮一家公司的風險時,我們總是喜歡考慮其債務的用途,因爲債務過載可能導致破產。與許多其他公司一樣,PHINIA Inc.(紐約證券交易所代碼:PHIN)也使用債務。但更重要的問題是:這筆債務會帶來多大的風險?

What Risk Does Debt Bring?

債務帶來什麼風險?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, debt can be an important tool in businesses, particularly capital heavy businesses. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

一般而言,只有當公司無法通過籌集資金或用自己的現金流輕鬆還清債務時,債務才會成爲真正的問題。資本主義的組成部分是 「創造性破壞」 過程,在這種過程中,倒閉的企業被銀行家無情地清算。儘管這種情況並不常見,但我們經常會看到負債公司永久稀釋股東,因爲貸款人迫使他們以不良价格籌集資金。當然,債務可以成爲企業的重要工具,尤其是資本密集型企業。當我們檢查債務水平時,我們首先要同時考慮現金和債務水平。

How Much Debt Does PHINIA Carry?

PHINIA 揹負了多少債務?

As you can see below, at the end of September 2024, PHINIA had US$985.0m of debt, up from US$800.0m a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, because it has a cash reserve of US$477.0m, its net debt is less, at about US$508.0m.

如下所示,截至2024年9月底,PHINIA的債務爲9.85億美元,高於去年同期的8億美元。點擊圖片查看更多細節。但是,由於其現金儲備爲4.77億美元,其淨負債較少,約爲5.08億美元。

big
NYSE:PHIN Debt to Equity History December 11th 2024
紐約證券交易所:PHIN 債務與股本比率歷史記錄 2024 年 12 月 11 日

A Look At PHINIA's Liabilities

看看 PHINIA 的負債

According to the last reported balance sheet, PHINIA had liabilities of US$1.02b due within 12 months, and liabilities of US$1.30b due beyond 12 months. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of US$477.0m as well as receivables valued at US$920.0m due within 12 months. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$923.0m.

根據上次報告的資產負債表,PHINIA的負債爲10.2億美元,12個月後到期的負債爲13.0億美元。除這些債務外,它有4.77億美元的現金以及價值9.2億美元的應收賬款將在12個月內到期。因此,其負債超過其現金和(短期)應收賬款總額9.23億美元。

This deficit isn't so bad because PHINIA is worth US$2.23b, and thus could probably raise enough capital to shore up its balance sheet, if the need arose. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.

這種赤字還不錯,因爲PHINIA的價值爲22.3億美元,因此如果需要,可能會籌集足夠的資金來支撐其資產負債表。但是,我們絕對希望留意其債務帶來過大風險的跡象。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我們通過以下方法來衡量公司的債務負擔與其盈利能力的關係:其淨負債除以未計利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),並計算其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)彌補利息支出(利息保障)的難易程度。這樣,我們既要考慮債務的絕對數量,也要考慮爲其支付的利率。

Looking at its net debt to EBITDA of 1.0 and interest cover of 3.7 times, it seems to us that PHINIA is probably using debt in a pretty reasonable way. But the interest payments are certainly sufficient to have us thinking about how affordable its debt is. Sadly, PHINIA's EBIT actually dropped 9.6% in the last year. If earnings continue on that decline then managing that debt will be difficult like delivering hot soup on a unicycle. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine PHINIA's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

從其淨負債佔息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的比例爲1.0和3.7倍的利息覆蓋率來看,在我們看來,PHINIA可能正在以相當合理的方式使用債務。但是,利息支付肯定足以讓我們考慮其債務的負擔能力。不幸的是,PHINIA的息稅前利潤實際上在去年下降了9.6%。如果收益繼續下降,那麼管理這筆債務將像在獨輪車上送熱湯一樣困難。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但是,未來的收益比什麼都重要,將決定PHINIA未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果您專注於未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。

But our final consideration is also important, because a company cannot pay debt with paper profits; it needs cold hard cash. So the logical step is to look at the proportion of that EBIT that is matched by actual free cash flow. During the last three years, PHINIA produced sturdy free cash flow equating to 53% of its EBIT, about what we'd expect. This free cash flow puts the company in a good position to pay down debt, when appropriate.

但是我們最終的考慮因素也很重要,因爲公司無法用紙面利潤來償還債務;它需要冷硬現金。因此,合乎邏輯的步驟是研究該息稅前利潤與實際自由現金流相匹配的比例。在過去三年中,PHINIA產生了穩健的自由現金流,相當於其息稅前利潤的53%,與我們的預期差不多。這種自由現金流使公司處於有利地位,可以在適當的時候償還債務。

Our View

我們的觀點

Even if we have reservations about how easily PHINIA is capable of (not) growing its EBIT, its net debt to EBITDA and conversion of EBIT to free cash flow make us think feel relatively unconcerned. Looking at all the angles mentioned above, it does seem to us that PHINIA is a somewhat risky investment as a result of its debt. That's not necessarily a bad thing, since leverage can boost returns on equity, but it is something to be aware of. Given our hesitation about the stock, it would be good to know if PHINIA insiders have sold any shares recently. You click here to find out if insiders have sold recently.

即使我們對PHINIA能夠(不)增加其息稅前利潤的難易程度持保留態度,但其淨負債轉化爲息稅折舊攤銷前利潤以及將息稅前利潤轉換爲自由現金流也使我們感到相對漠不關心。從上面提到的所有角度來看,在我們看來,由於負債累累,PHINIA確實是一項風險較大的投資。這不一定是一件壞事,因爲槓桿可以提高股本回報率,但這是需要注意的事情。鑑於我們對該股猶豫不決,很高興知道PHINIA內部人士最近是否出售了任何股票。您單擊此處查看內部人士最近是否出售了商品。

If, after all that, you're more interested in a fast growing company with a rock-solid balance sheet, then check out our list of net cash growth stocks without delay.

畢竟,如果你對一家資產負債表堅如磐石的快速成長型公司更感興趣,那麼請立即查看我們的淨現金增長股票清單。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論