share_log

Tennant (NYSE:TNC) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet

Tennant (NYSE:TNC) Has A Pretty Healthy Balance Sheet

坦能 (紐交所:TNC) 的資產負債表相當健康
Simply Wall St ·  12/12 06:29

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We can see that Tennant Company (NYSE:TNC) does use debt in its business. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

傳奇基金經理李露(由查理·芒格支持)曾經說過:「最大的投資風險不是價格的波動,而是你是否會遭受永久的資本損失。」因此,當你評估公司的風險時,看來聰明的貨幣知道債務(通常涉及破產)是一個非常重要的因素。我們可以看到,坦能公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:TNC)確實在其業務中使用了債務。但更重要的問題是:這筆債務會帶來多大的風險?

When Is Debt Dangerous?

債務何時危險?

Debt is a tool to help businesses grow, but if a business is incapable of paying off its lenders, then it exists at their mercy. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we think about a company's use of debt, we first look at cash and debt together.

債務是幫助企業增長的工具,但是如果企業無法償還貸款,那麼債務就任其擺佈。在最壞的情況下,如果公司無法向債權人付款,它可能會破產。儘管這種情況並不常見,但我們經常會看到負債公司永久稀釋股東,因爲貸款人迫使他們以不良价格籌集資金。當然,債務的好處在於它通常代表廉價資本,尤其是當它以高回報率進行再投資的能力取代公司的稀釋時。當我們考慮公司使用債務時,我們首先將現金和債務放在一起考慮。

How Much Debt Does Tennant Carry?

坦能揹負多少債務?

You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Tennant had US$209.3m of debt in September 2024, down from US$221.5m, one year before. On the flip side, it has US$91.4m in cash leading to net debt of about US$117.9m.

你可以點擊下圖查看歷史數字,但它顯示坦能在2024年9月有2.093億美元的債務,低於一年前的2.215億美元。另一方面,它擁有9140萬美元的現金,淨負債約爲1.179億美元。

big
NYSE:TNC Debt to Equity History December 12th 2024
紐約證券交易所:跨國公司債權比率歷史記錄 2024 年 12 月 12 日

How Healthy Is Tennant's Balance Sheet?

坦能的資產負債表有多健康?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Tennant had liabilities of US$273.5m due within a year, and liabilities of US$294.1m falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$91.4m and US$260.2m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by US$216.0m.

最新的資產負債表數據顯示,坦能的負債爲2.735億美元,此後到期的負債爲2.941億美元。另一方面,它有9140萬美元的現金和價值2.602億美元的應收賬款在一年內到期。因此,其負債超過其現金和(短期)應收賬款總額2.160億美元。

Given Tennant has a market capitalization of US$1.62b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse.

鑑於坦能的市值爲16.2億美元,很難相信這些負債會構成很大的威脅。話雖如此,很明顯,我們應該繼續監控其資產負債表,以免情況惡化。

We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.

我們通過以下方法來衡量公司的債務負擔與其盈利能力的關係:其淨負債除以未計利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),並計算其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)彌補利息支出(利息保障)的難易程度。這樣,我們既要考慮債務的絕對數量,也要考慮爲其支付的利率。

Tennant has a low net debt to EBITDA ratio of only 0.63. And its EBIT easily covers its interest expense, being 13.4 times the size. So you could argue it is no more threatened by its debt than an elephant is by a mouse. On the other hand, Tennant saw its EBIT drop by 9.0% in the last twelve months. If earnings continue to decline at that rate the company may have increasing difficulty managing its debt load. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Tennant can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.

坦能的淨負債與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的比率很低,僅爲0.63。而且其息稅前利潤很容易彌補其利息支出,是其規模的13.4倍。因此,你可以爭辯說,它受到債務的威脅並不比大象受到老鼠的威脅更大。另一方面,坦能的息稅前利潤在過去十二個月中下降了9.0%。如果收益繼續以這種速度下降,公司管理債務負擔的難度可能會越來越大。資產負債表顯然是分析債務時需要關注的領域。但最終,該業務的未來盈利能力將決定坦能能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的想法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。

Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Looking at the most recent three years, Tennant recorded free cash flow of 41% of its EBIT, which is weaker than we'd expect. That's not great, when it comes to paying down debt.

最後,儘管稅務人員可能喜歡會計利潤,但貸款人只接受冷硬現金。因此,我們總是檢查該息稅前利潤中有多少轉化爲自由現金流。縱觀最近三年,坦能錄得的自由現金流佔其息稅前利潤的41%,低於我們的預期。在償還債務方面,這並不好。

Our View

我們的觀點

On our analysis Tennant's interest cover should signal that it won't have too much trouble with its debt. However, our other observations weren't so heartening. For example, its EBIT growth rate makes us a little nervous about its debt. Considering this range of data points, we think Tennant is in a good position to manage its debt levels. Having said that, the load is sufficiently heavy that we would recommend any shareholders keep a close eye on it. Of course, we wouldn't say no to the extra confidence that we'd gain if we knew that Tennant insiders have been buying shares: if you're on the same wavelength, you can find out if insiders are buying by clicking this link.

根據我們的分析,坦能的利息保障應該表明其在債務方面不會遇到太多問題。但是,我們的其他觀察結果並不那麼令人鼓舞。例如,其息稅前利潤增長率使我們對其債務有些緊張。考慮到這一系列數據點,我們認爲坦能完全有能力管理其債務水平。話雖如此,負擔足夠沉重,我們建議所有股東密切關注。當然,我們不會對如果我們知道坦能內部人士一直在購買股票所獲得的額外信心說不:如果你持同樣的看法,你可以通過點擊這個鏈接來了解內部人士是否在買入。

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

歸根結底,通常最好專注於沒有淨負債的公司。您可以訪問我們的此類公司的特別名單(所有公司都有利潤增長的記錄)。它是免費的。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall ST 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論