Hayward Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:HAYW) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 87%
Hayward Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:HAYW) Is a Favorite Amongst Institutional Investors Who Own 87%
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Hayward Holdings implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 51% of the business is held by the top 12 shareholders
- Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 機構對海沃德控股的大量持股意味着它們對公司的股價具有重大影響
- 51% 的業務由前 12 名股東持有
- 使用分析師預測的數據以及所有權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現
A look at the shareholders of Hayward Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:HAYW) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 87% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
看看海沃德控股公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:HAYW)的股東可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有87%所有權的機構。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
由於機構所有者擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策往往具有很大的分量,尤其是對於個人投資者而言。因此,投資於公司的機構資金中有很大一部分通常是對其未來的巨大信任投票。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Hayward Holdings, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究海沃德控股的每種類型的所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Hayward Holdings?
關於海沃德控股公司,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會變得更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會註冊一些機構,尤其是在它們成長的情況下。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Hayward Holdings. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Hayward Holdings' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
如你所見,機構投資者持有海沃德控股公司的大量股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看海沃德控股的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Hayward Holdings. The company's largest shareholder is FMR LLC, with ownership of 9.3%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.1% and 7.3%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對海沃德控股公司進行有意義的投資。該公司的最大股東是FMR LLC,所有權爲9.3%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的8.1%和7.3%。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
查看股東登記處,我們可以看到,51%的所有權由前12名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東在所有權中擁有多數股權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目標。有很多分析師報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of Hayward Holdings
海沃德控股的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且確實因司法管轄區而異。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Hayward Holdings, Inc.. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$18m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. Arguably, recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最新的數據顯示,內部人士擁有海沃德控股公司不到1%的股份。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士擁有價值1800萬美元的股票。絕對值可能比比例份額更重要。可以說,最近的買入和賣出同樣值得考慮。你可以點擊這裏查看內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
普通公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 12% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司12%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 1 warning sign we've spotted with Hayward Holdings .
我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,你應該注意我們在海沃德控股公司發現的1個警告信號。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但歸根結底,決定該業務所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示分析師是否在預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。