Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Silence Therapeutics Plc's (NASDAQ:SLN) Recent 22% Drop Adds to One-year Losses
Institutional Owners May Take Dramatic Actions as Silence Therapeutics Plc's (NASDAQ:SLN) Recent 22% Drop Adds to One-year Losses
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Silence Therapeutics' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 8 shareholders own 51% of the company
- 26% of Silence Therapeutics is held by insiders
- 高機構所有權意味着Silence Therapeutics的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
- 前8名股東擁有公司51%的股份
- Silence Therapeutics的26%由內部人士持有
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Silence Therapeutics plc (NASDAQ:SLN), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 44% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正控制了Silence Therapeutics plc(納斯達克股票代碼:SLN),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有44%所有權的機構。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。
And institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's share price fell by 22% last week. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 57% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Often called "market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. Hence, if weakness in Silence Therapeutics' share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.
在上週公司股價下跌22%之後,機構投資者遭受的損失最大。毋庸置疑,最近的虧損進一步加劇了股東一年的虧損57%,但下降幅度可能不大,尤其是對於這類股東而言。機構通常被稱爲 「市場推動者」,在影響任何股票的價格動態方面擁有強大的力量。因此,如果Silence Therapeutics的股價持續疲軟,機構投資者可能會感到不得不出售該股票,這對於個人投資者來說可能並不理想。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Silence Therapeutics.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們有關Silence Therapeutics的信息。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Silence Therapeutics?
關於沉默療法,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會變得更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會註冊一些機構,尤其是在它們成長的情況下。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Silence Therapeutics. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Silence Therapeutics' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
如你所見,機構投資者持有Silence Therapeutics的大量股份。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎地依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們有時也會弄錯。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Silence Therapeutics的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

It would appear that 5.6% of Silence Therapeutics shares are controlled by hedge funds. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Richard Griffiths is currently the largest shareholder, with 15% of shares outstanding. Robert Keith is the second largest shareholder owning 8.7% of common stock, and TCG Crossover Management, LLC holds about 6.4% of the company stock.
看來Silence Therapeutics有5.6%的股票由對沖基金控制。這值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是非常活躍的投資者,他們可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期內看到價值創造(以及更高的股價)。理查德·格里菲思目前是最大股東,已發行股份的15%。羅伯特·基思是第二大股東,擁有8.7%的普通股,TCG Crossover Management, LLC持有該公司約6.4%的股份。
We also observed that the top 8 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前8名股東佔股份登記冊的一半以上,少數較小的股東在一定程度上平衡較大股東的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解公衆輿論也是有意義的。有很多分析師報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of Silence Therapeutics
沉默療法的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
儘管內部人員的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Silence Therapeutics plc. Insiders have a US$92m stake in this US$349m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們的信息表明,內部人士持有Silence Therapeutics plc的大量股份。業內人士在這筆3.49億美元的業務中持有9200萬美元的股份。我們可以說這表明了與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然很小;一些內部人士可能已經創立了該公司。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
普通公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in Silence Therapeutics. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有Silence Therapeutics11%的股份。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Equity Ownership
私募股權所有權
With an ownership of 12%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
私募股權公司擁有12%的所有權,可以在制定以價值創造爲重點的公司戰略方面發揮作用。一些投資者可能會爲此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵制定有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有人可能會在投資上市後退出投資。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Silence Therapeutics better, we need to consider many other factors. For instance, we've identified 4 warning signs for Silence Therapeutics (1 shouldn't be ignored) that you should be aware of.
擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得考慮的。但是,爲了更好地了解Silence Therapeutics,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。例如,我們已經確定了Silence Therapeutics的4個警告信號(其中一個不容忽視),你應該注意這些信號。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall ST 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。