Institutional Investors Are Linklogis Inc.'s (HKG:9959) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's HK$691m Market Cap Gain
Institutional Investors Are Linklogis Inc.'s (HKG:9959) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's HK$691m Market Cap Gain
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Linklogis' stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 4 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Recent sales by insiders
- 顯著的高比例機構持股意味着聯易融的股票價格對他們的交易行爲非常敏感
- 共計4位投資者在公司中擁有52%的控股權
- 高管近期的賣出行爲
A look at the shareholders of Linklogis Inc. (HKG:9959) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 29% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
查看聯易融(臨時代碼)的股東(HKG:9959)可以告訴我們哪個群體最強大。我們可以看到機構在公司中擁有29%的控股權。這意味着如果股票上漲,這個群體將獲得最大的利益(或者在股票下跌時損失最大)。
And things are looking up for institutional investors after the company gained HK$691m in market cap last week. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 45%.
在公司上週市值增加了69100萬港元后,機構投資者的前景看起來不錯。上週的收益將進一步提升目前股東年回報率,現已達到45%。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Linklogis.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於聯易融(臨時代碼)的哪些信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Linklogis?
機構持股對聯易融(臨時代碼)意味着什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
We can see that Linklogis does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Linklogis' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到聯易融(臨時代碼)確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司一部分的股票。這在專業投資者中暗示了一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時會做出糟糕的投資,就像其他人一樣。當多個機構持有一隻股票時,總是存在風險,可能會陷入"擁擠的交易"。當這種交易出現問題時,多個參與方可能會競爭迅速賣出股票。這種風險在沒有增長曆史的公司中更高。你可以在下面看到聯易融(臨時代碼)的歷史收益和營業收入,但請記住,事情總是有更多的內容。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Linklogis. The company's largest shareholder is Tencent Holdings Limited, with ownership of 17%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 15% and 11%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Song Qun, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
我們注意到對聯易融(臨時代碼)的對沖基金沒有進行有意義的投資。該公司的最大股東是騰訊控股,持股比例爲17%。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有15%和11%的流通股份。第二大股東宋群恰好擔任首席執行官。
Our research also brought to light the fact that roughly 52% of the company is controlled by the top 4 shareholders suggesting that these owners wield significant influence on the business.
我們的研究還揭示了一個事實,即公司約52%的股份由前四大股東控制,這表明這些股東在業務上具有重要影響力。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.
研究機構持股是一種評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。分析師情緒的研究同樣可以達到此目的。對該股票的分析師覆蓋率略低,但不多。因此它有增加更多覆蓋機會。
Insider Ownership Of Linklogis
聯易融(臨時代碼)的內部持股
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
雖然對內部人的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎每個人都認爲董事會成員是內部人。公司管理層運行業務,但CEO會向董事會報告,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Linklogis Inc.. Insiders own HK$962m worth of shares in the HK$4.0b company. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
看來內部人士擁有聯易融(臨時代碼)的相當大比例股份。內部人士在這一市值40億港元的公司中持有價值96200萬港元的股份。我們認爲這顯示了與股東的對齊,但值得注意的是,公司仍然相當小;一些內部人士可能是創始人。您可以點擊此鏈接查看這些內部人士是否有在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 25% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Linklogis. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆持有25%的股份,主要由個人投資者組成,對聯易融(臨時代碼)有一定程度的影響。雖然這種股份的大小可能不足以使政策決定對他們有利,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Public Company Ownership
上市公司所有權
Public companies currently own 17% of Linklogis stock. We can't be certain but it is quite possible this is a strategic stake. The businesses may be similar, or work together.
上市公司目前持有聯易融(臨時代碼)17%的股份。我們不能確定,但這很可能是一個戰略性股權。這些業務可能相似,或者會合作。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider risks, for instance. Every company has them, and we've spotted 2 warning signs for Linklogis you should know about.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他因素更加重要。比如考慮風險。每家公司都有風險,而我們已經發現聯易融(臨時代碼)的兩個警告信號,你應該知道。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。