share_log

Kunlun Energy Company Limited's (HKG:135) Largest Shareholders Are Private Companies Who Were Rewarded as Market Cap Surged HK$2.9b Last Week

Kunlun Energy Company Limited's (HKG:135) Largest Shareholders Are Private Companies Who Were Rewarded as Market Cap Surged HK$2.9b Last Week

崑崙能源有限公司(港股代碼:135)的最大股東是私人公司,上週市值飆升至港幣29億,令他們獲得了豐厚回報。
Simply Wall St ·  08:27

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significant control over Kunlun Energy by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
  • 58% of the company is held by a single shareholder (China National Petroleum Corporation)
  • 15% of Kunlun Energy is held by Institutions
  • 私營公司對崑崙能源的嚴格控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
  • 公司58%的股份由單一股東持有(中國石油天然氣集團公司)
  • 崑崙能源15%的股份由機構持有

If you want to know who really controls Kunlun Energy Company Limited (HKG:135), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 58% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制着崑崙能源有限公司(HKG: 135),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,私營公司擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲58%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

Clearly, private companies benefitted the most after the company's market cap rose by HK$2.9b last week.

顯然,在上週該公司的市值上漲29億港元之後,私營公司受益最大。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Kunlun Energy.

在下圖中,我們放大了崑崙能源的不同所有權群體。

big
SEHK:135 Ownership Breakdown December 13th 2024
SEHK: 135 所有權明細 2024 年 12 月 13 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Kunlun Energy?

關於崑崙能源,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會變得更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會註冊一些機構,尤其是在它們成長的情況下。

Kunlun Energy already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Kunlun Energy's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

崑崙能源已經在股份登記處設立了機構。事實上,他們擁有該公司可觀的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到崑崙能源的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

big
SEHK:135 Earnings and Revenue Growth December 13th 2024
SEHK: 135 2024 年 12 月 13 日的收益和收入增長

Kunlun Energy is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that China National Petroleum Corporation is the largest shareholder with 58% of shares outstanding. This implies that they have majority interest control of the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 1.7% and 1.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

崑崙能源不歸對沖基金所有。我們的數據顯示,中國石油天然氣集團公司是最大股東,已發行股份的58%。這意味着他們對公司的未來擁有多數權益控制權。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的1.7%和1.5%。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解公衆輿論也是有意義的。有很多分析師報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Kunlun Energy

崑崙能源的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難要求董事會對決策負責。

Our data cannot confirm that board members are holding shares personally. It is rare to see such a low level of personal ownership, amongst the board (and it is possible that our data might be incomplete). Concerned investors should check here to see if insiders have been selling or buying.

我們的數據無法證實董事會成員個人持有股份。董事會中的個人所有權水平很少見(而且我們的數據可能不完整)。有關投資者應在此處查看內部人士是否在賣出或買入。

General Public Ownership

普通公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 28% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司28%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 58%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司58%的股份。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中予以披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Take risks for example - Kunlun Energy has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。以風險爲例-崑崙能源有 1 個警告信號,我們認爲您應該注意。

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

但歸根結底,決定該業務所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示分析師是否在預測更光明的未來。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論