NYOCOR (SHSE:600821) Seems To Be Using A Lot Of Debt
NYOCOR (SHSE:600821) Seems To Be Using A Lot Of Debt
Some say volatility, rather than debt, is the best way to think about risk as an investor, but Warren Buffett famously said that 'Volatility is far from synonymous with risk.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We note that NYOCOR Co., Ltd. (SHSE:600821) does have debt on its balance sheet. But should shareholders be worried about its use of debt?
有人說,波動性,而不是債務,是投資者思考風險的最佳方式,但禾倫·巴菲特曾說過一句名言:「波動性遠非風險的代名詞。」因此,當你評估公司的風險時,看來聰明的貨幣知道債務(通常涉及破產)是一個非常重要的因素。我們注意到,NYOCOR有限公司(SHSE: 600821)的資產負債表上確實有債務。但是,股東是否應該擔心其債務的使用?
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
債務帶來什麼風險?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Ultimately, if the company can't fulfill its legal obligations to repay debt, shareholders could walk away with nothing. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.
當企業無法通過自由現金流或以誘人的價格籌集資金來輕鬆履行這些義務時,債務和其他負債就會成爲風險。最終,如果公司無法履行償還債務的法律義務,股東可能會一無所獲。但是,更常見(但仍然昂貴)的情況是,公司爲了控制債務,必須以低廉的股價稀釋股東。但是,通過取代稀釋,對於需要資本以高回報率投資增長的企業來說,債務可以成爲一個非常好的工具。當我們檢查債務水平時,我們首先要同時考慮現金和債務水平。
How Much Debt Does NYOCOR Carry?
NYOCOR 揹負了多少債務?
As you can see below, at the end of September 2024, NYOCOR had CN¥22.1b of debt, up from CN¥18.9b a year ago. Click the image for more detail. However, it does have CN¥1.30b in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about CN¥20.8b.
如下所示,截至2024年9月底,紐約證券交易所的債務爲221元人民幣,高於去年同期的189元人民幣。點擊圖片查看更多細節。但是,它確實有13元人民幣的現金抵消了這一點,導致淨負債約爲208元人民幣。
How Healthy Is NYOCOR's Balance Sheet?
NYOCOR 的資產負債表有多健康?
The latest balance sheet data shows that NYOCOR had liabilities of CN¥8.31b due within a year, and liabilities of CN¥18.9b falling due after that. Offsetting these obligations, it had cash of CN¥1.30b as well as receivables valued at CN¥8.45b due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling CN¥17.5b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
最新的資產負債表數據顯示,NYOCOR的負債爲83.1元人民幣在一年內到期,189元人民幣的負債在此之後到期。除了這些債務外,它還有13元人民幣的現金以及價值84.5元人民幣的應收賬款將在12個月內到期。因此,它的負債總額比現金和短期應收賬款的總和多出175元人民幣。
This deficit casts a shadow over the CN¥11.4b company, like a colossus towering over mere mortals. So we'd watch its balance sheet closely, without a doubt. At the end of the day, NYOCOR would probably need a major re-capitalization if its creditors were to demand repayment.
這一赤字給這家114元人民幣的公司蒙上了陰影,就像一個聳立在凡人之上的巨人。因此,毫無疑問,我們將密切關注其資產負債表。歸根結底,如果NYOCOR的債權人要求還款,NYOCOR可能需要進行大規模的資本重組。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我們通過以下方法來衡量公司的債務負擔與其盈利能力的關係:其淨負債除以未計利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),並計算其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)彌補利息支出(利息保障)的難易程度。這種方法的優勢在於,我們既考慮了債務的絕對數量(淨負債佔息稅折舊攤銷前利潤),也考慮了與該債務相關的實際利息支出(及其利息覆蓋率)。
NYOCOR has a rather high debt to EBITDA ratio of 7.3 which suggests a meaningful debt load. However, its interest coverage of 2.6 is reasonably strong, which is a good sign. Given the debt load, it's hardly ideal that NYOCOR's EBIT was pretty flat over the last twelve months. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine NYOCOR's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
NYOCOR的債務與息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的比率相當高,爲7.3,這表明債務負擔相當可觀。但是,其2.6的利息覆蓋率相當強,這是一個好兆頭。考慮到債務負擔,NYOCOR的息稅前利潤在過去十二個月中保持相當平穩並不理想。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但是,未來的收益將決定NYOCOR未來維持健康資產負債表的能力。因此,如果您專注於未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。
Finally, while the tax-man may adore accounting profits, lenders only accept cold hard cash. So we always check how much of that EBIT is translated into free cash flow. Over the last three years, NYOCOR saw substantial negative free cash flow, in total. While that may be a result of expenditure for growth, it does make the debt far more risky.
最後,儘管稅務人員可能喜歡會計利潤,但貸款人只接受冷硬現金。因此,我們總是檢查該息稅前利潤中有多少轉化爲自由現金流。在過去的三年中,NYOCOR的自由現金流總額爲負數。儘管這可能是增長支出的結果,但它確實使債務風險大大增加。
Our View
我們的觀點
On the face of it, NYOCOR's net debt to EBITDA left us tentative about the stock, and its conversion of EBIT to free cash flow was no more enticing than the one empty restaurant on the busiest night of the year. But at least its EBIT growth rate is not so bad. After considering the datapoints discussed, we think NYOCOR has too much debt. While some investors love that sort of risky play, it's certainly not our cup of tea. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for NYOCOR that you should be aware of.
從表面上看,NYOCOR的淨負債佔息稅折舊攤銷前利潤讓我們對該股持初步看法,其將息稅前利潤轉換爲自由現金流並不比一年中最繁忙的夜晚那家空蕩蕩的餐廳更具吸引力。但至少它的息稅前利潤增長率還不錯。在考慮了所討論的數據點之後,我們認爲NYOCOR的債務太多了。儘管有些投資者喜歡這種冒險的遊戲,但這肯定不是我們的好選擇。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中學到的關於債務的知識最多。但歸根結底,每家公司都可以控制資產負債表之外存在的風險。例如,我們已經確定了NYOCOR的1個警告標誌,你應該注意這一點。
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
歸根結底,通常最好專注於沒有淨負債的公司。您可以訪問我們的此類公司的特別名單(所有公司都有利潤增長的記錄)。它是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall ST 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。