Institutions Own 36% of Centre Testing International Group Co. Ltd. (SZSE:300012) Shares but Retail Investors Control 44% of the Company
Institutions Own 36% of Centre Testing International Group Co. Ltd. (SZSE:300012) Shares but Retail Investors Control 44% of the Company
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- The considerable ownership by retail investors in Centre Testing International Group indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- The top 23 shareholders own 50% of the company
- Insider ownership in Centre Testing International Group is 20%
- 零售投資者在華測檢測的巨大持有比例表明,他們在管理和業務策略方面有更大的發言權。
- 前23大股東持有公司50%的股份。
- 華測檢測的內部持有比例爲20%。
Every investor in Centre Testing International Group Co. Ltd. (SZSE:300012) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 44% to be precise, is retail investors. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
在華測檢測股份有限公司(SZSE:300012)中,每位投資者都應了解最強大的股東群體。持有公司最多股份的群體,準確地說,大約爲44%,是零售投資者。換句話說,這個群體從對公司的投資中獲得最大的收益(或承擔最大的損失)。
Institutions, on the other hand, account for 36% of the company's stockholders. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies.
另一方面,機構佔公司股東的36%。機構通常持有更成熟公司的股份,而看到內部人士持有一些較小公司的股份並不奇怪。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Centre Testing International Group.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於華測檢測的信息。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Centre Testing International Group?
機構所有權對華測檢測有何啓示?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
We can see that Centre Testing International Group does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Centre Testing International Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到華測檢測確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股份的大部分。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經審視了這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯的。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售一隻股票,看到股價大幅下跌並不罕見。所以查看華測檢測過去的營業收入軌跡是值得的,(如下所示)。當然,也要記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
Centre Testing International Group is not owned by hedge funds. Feng Wan is currently the company's largest shareholder with 15% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 5.1% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.1% by the third-largest shareholder. Additionally, the company's CEO Xianzhong Shentu directly holds 0.6% of the total shares outstanding.
華測檢測並不被對沖基金所擁有。 豐萬目前是公司的最大股東,持有15%的流通股。 對於背景信息,第二大股東持有大約5.1%的流通股,第三大股東持有4.1%的股份。 此外,公司首席執行官申宇直接持有0.6%的流通股。
A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 23 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.
更詳細地看我們的股東數據,前23名股東的合計持股量爲50%,這意味着沒有任何單一股東擁有絕對多數股權。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究一家公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解市場趨勢同樣也是有意義的。現在有相當多的分析師關注這隻股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Centre Testing International Group
華測檢測股份有限公司的內部持股比例很高,內部人士擁有該公司人民幣22億元的股票。許多人會認爲在這個規模的公司中,這表明他們與股東存在良好的協同作用。您可以單擊此處,查看這些內部人士是否一直在買進或賣出股票。
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能會略有不同,但董事會成員始終算作內部人。公司管理層向董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Centre Testing International Group Co. Ltd.. Insiders own CN¥4.5b worth of shares in the CN¥23b company. That's quite meaningful. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最近的數據表明,內部人士擁有華測檢測集團有限公司合理比例的股份。內部人士在這家市值230億人民幣的公司中,擁有價值45億人民幣的股份。這非常有意義。大多數人會認爲這表明與股東之間有良好的默契,尤其是在這樣規模的公司中。您可以點擊此處查看這些內部人士是否有買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 44% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆--包括零售投資者--在公司中持有44%的股份,因此不能輕易忽視。雖然這個股份比例可能不足以影響政策決策,但他們仍然能夠對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Centre Testing International Group better, we need to consider many other factors.
考慮擁有公司股份的不同群體總是值得的。但是爲了更好地理解華測檢測,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can find historic revenue and earnings in this detailed graph.
我喜歡深入了解一個公司過去的表現。您可以在這個詳細的圖表中找到歷史營業收入和盈利。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能想考慮這家公司是會增長還是縮小。幸運的是,你可以查看這份免費的報告,了解分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。