share_log

Private Companies Are Materialise NV's (NASDAQ:MTLS) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by US$62m Last Week

Private Companies Are Materialise NV's (NASDAQ:MTLS) Biggest Owners and Were Rewarded After Market Cap Rose by US$62m Last Week

私營公司是Materialise NV(納斯達克:MTLS)最大的股東,且在市值上週上漲6200萬美元后獲得了獎勵。
Simply Wall St ·  12/13 18:21

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Materialise's significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
  • Idem owns 56% of the company
  • Institutional ownership in Materialise is 12%
  • Materialise擁有大量的私營公司所有權,這表明關鍵決策受廣大公衆股東的影響
  • Idem 擁有該公司 56% 的股份
  • Materialise 的機構所有權爲 12%

If you want to know who really controls Materialise NV (NASDAQ:MTLS), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. We can see that private companies own the lion's share in the company with 56% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

如果你想知道誰真正控制着Materialise NV(納斯達克股票代碼:MTLS),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。我們可以看到,私營公司擁有該公司的大部分股份,所有權爲56%。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。

As a result, private companies were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 14% gain.

結果,私營公司是上週14%漲幅的最大受益者。

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Materialise.

讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Materialise的什麼。

big
NasdaqGS:MTLS Ownership Breakdown December 13th 2024
納斯達克GS:2024年12月13日MTLS所有權明細

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Materialise?

關於Materiase,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會變得更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會註冊一些機構,尤其是在它們成長的情況下。

We can see that Materialise does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Materialise's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

我們可以看到,Materialise確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司很大一部分股票。這意味着在這些機構工作的分析師已經看過這隻股票,他們很喜歡。但是就像其他人一樣,他們可能錯了。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Materialise的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。

big
NasdaqGS:MTLS Earnings and Revenue Growth December 13th 2024
納斯達克GS:2024年12月13日MTLS收益和收入增長

Materialise is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that Idem is the largest shareholder with 56% of shares outstanding. This essentially means that they have extensive influence, if not outright control, over the future of the corporation. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 2.7% and 1.8%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

Materialise 不歸對沖基金所有。我們的數據顯示,Idem是最大股東,已發行股份的56%。這實質上意味着他們對公司的未來具有廣泛的影響力,甚至是完全的控制權。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的2.7%和1.8%。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解公衆輿論也是有意義的。有很多分析師報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。

Insider Ownership Of Materialise

Materialise 的內部所有權

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

不同國家對內部人士的定義可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是計算在內。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東的關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。

We can see that insiders own shares in Materialise NV. It has a market capitalization of just US$480m, and insiders have US$9.8m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

我們可以看到,內部人士擁有內華達州Materialise的股份。它的市值僅爲4.8億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值980萬美元的股票。這至少顯示出一定的對齊性。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。

General Public Ownership

普通公有制

With a 30% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Materialise. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

擁有30%的所有權的公衆(主要由個人投資者組成)對Materialise有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。

Private Company Ownership

私人公司所有權

We can see that Private Companies own 56%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

我們可以看到,私人公司擁有已發行股份的56%。私營公司可能是關聯方。有時,內部人士通過控股私營公司而對上市公司擁有權益,而不是以個人身份擁有權益。儘管很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是一個需要進一步研究的領域。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 1 warning sign with Materialise , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,以永遠存在的投資風險幽靈爲例。我們已經在Materialise中發現了一個警告信號,了解它們應該是您投資過程的一部分。

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論