share_log

Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as RxSight, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:RXST) Recent US$258m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses

Institutional Owners May Consider Drastic Measures as RxSight, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:RXST) Recent US$258m Drop Adds to Long-term Losses

機構投資者可能會考慮採取嚴厲措施,因爲RxSight, Inc.(納斯達克:RXST)最近25800萬美元的下跌加劇了長期虧損。
Simply Wall St ·  02:53

Key Insights

關鍵見解

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies RxSight's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
  • A total of 17 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
  • Insiders have been buying lately
  • 高機構所有權意味着RxSight的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
  • 共有17名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
  • 內部人士最近一直在買入

Every investor in RxSight, Inc. (NASDAQ:RXST) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 75% to be precise, is institutions. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

RxSight, Inc.(納斯達克股票代碼:RXST)的每位投資者都應該知道最強大的股東群體。持有該公司股份最多的集團是機構,準確地說約爲75%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。

And institutional investors saw their holdings value drop by 15% last week. This set of investors may especially be concerned about the current loss, which adds to a one-year loss of 10% for shareholders. Institutions or "liquidity providers" control large sums of money and therefore, these types of investors usually have a lot of influence over stock price movements. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell RxSight, which might have negative implications on individual investors.

上週,機構投資者的持股價值下降了15%。這組投資者可能特別擔心當前的虧損,這加劇了股東一年的虧損10%。機構或 「流動性提供者」 控制着大量資金,因此,這些類型的投資者通常對股價走勢有很大的影響力。因此,如果下跌趨勢持續下去,機構可能會面臨出售RxSight的壓力,這可能會對個人投資者產生負面影響。

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of RxSight.

在下圖中,我們放大了 RxSight 的不同所有權組。

big
NasdaqGM:RXST Ownership Breakdown December 13th 2024
納斯達克通用汽車公司:RXST 所有權明細 2024 年 12 月 13 日

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About RxSight?

關於RxSight,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

許多機構根據接近當地市場的指數來衡量其表現。因此,他們通常會更多地關注主要指數中包含的公司。

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in RxSight. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of RxSight, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

如你所見,機構投資者在RxSight中擁有相當數量的股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得檢查一下RxSight過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。

big
NasdaqGM:RXST Earnings and Revenue Growth December 13th 2024
納斯達克通用汽車公司:RXST 收益和收入增長 2024 年 12 月 13 日

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in RxSight. Our data shows that RA Capital Management, L.P. is the largest shareholder with 9.7% of shares outstanding. With 6.9% and 5.7% of the shares outstanding respectively, BlackRock, Inc. and The Vanguard Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Ronald Kurtz directly holds 2.1% of the total shares outstanding.

機構投資者擁有公司50%以上的股份,因此加在一起可能會對董事會的決策產生重大影響。對沖基金在RxSight中的股票不多。我們的數據顯示,RA Capital Management, L.P. 是最大股東,已發行股份爲9.7%。貝萊德公司和先鋒集團公司分別擁有6.9%和5.7%的已發行股份,是第二和第三大股東。此外,該公司首席執行官羅納德·庫爾茨直接持有已發行股份總額的2.1%。

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 51% of the ownership is controlled by the top 17 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

查看股東登記處,我們可以看到,51%的所有權由前17名股東控制,這意味着沒有一個股東在所有權中擁有多數股權。

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

儘管研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解公衆輿論也是有意義的。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此您可以很容易地研究預測的增長。

Insider Ownership Of RxSight

RxSight 的內部所有權

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且確實因司法管轄區而異。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難要求董事會對決策負責。

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in RxSight, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$75m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有RxSight, Inc.的部分股份。這是一家大公司,因此很高興看到這種一致性。內部人士擁有價值7500萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。很高興看到內部人士的這種投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。

General Public Ownership

普通公有制

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 11% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司11%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。

Private Equity Ownership

私募股權所有權

With a stake of 9.7%, private equity firms could influence the RxSight board. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.

私募股權公司持有9.7%的股份,可能會影響RxSight董事會。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲私募股權有時是追究管理層責任的激進分子。但是其他時候,私募股權在公司上市後正在售罄。

Next Steps:

後續步驟:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for RxSight that you should be aware of before investing here.

儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。例如,我們發現了RxSight的1個警告信號,在這裏投資之前你應該注意這個信號。

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

歸根結底,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問這份關於公司分析師預測的免費報告。

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。

声明:本內容僅用作提供資訊及教育之目的,不構成對任何特定投資或投資策略的推薦或認可。 更多信息
    搶先評論