DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603233) Market Cap Increased by CN¥649m, Insiders Receive a 65% Cut
DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.'s (SHSE:603233) Market Cap Increased by CN¥649m, Insiders Receive a 65% Cut
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Insiders appear to have a vested interest in DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group's growth, as seen by their sizeable ownership
- The top 3 shareholders own 57% of the company
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 業內人士似乎對大參林製藥集團的增長有既得利益,從他們龐大的所有權來看
- 前三名股東擁有公司57%的股份
- 分析師的預測以及所有權數據可以讓人們對企業前景有一個深刻的了解
To get a sense of who is truly in control of DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. (SHSE:603233), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 65% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制了大參林藥業集團有限公司(SHSE: 603233),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。個人內部人士持有公司65%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。
As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 3.6% gain.
結果,內部人士是上週3.6%漲幅的最大受益者。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group.
在下圖中,我們放大了大參林製藥集團的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group?
關於大參林藥業集團,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會變得更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會註冊一些機構,尤其是在它們成長的情況下。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
如您所見,機構投資者持有大參林製藥集團的大量股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。如果兩個大型機構投資者試圖同時拋售股票,股價大幅下跌的情況並不少見。因此,值得查看大參林製藥集團過去的收益軌跡(見下文)。當然,請記住,還有其他因素需要考慮。
DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group is not owned by hedge funds. The company's largest shareholder is Yun Feng Ke, with ownership of 21%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 20% and 16% of the stock.
大參林藥業集團不歸對沖基金所有。該公司的最大股東是雲峯科,所有權爲21%。相比之下,第二和第三大股東持有約20%和16%的股份。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 57% stake.
對股東登記冊的更詳細研究表明,3名最大股東通過其57%的股份擁有公司的大量所有權。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲你的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種很好的做法。有很多分析師報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group
大參林製藥集團的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
儘管內部人員的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層對董事會的回答,董事會應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員自己也在董事會中。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東的關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。
Our information suggests that insiders own more than half of DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd.. This gives them effective control of the company. Insiders own CN¥12b worth of shares in the CN¥18b company. That's extraordinary! It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been selling any of their shares.
我們的信息表明,內部人士擁有大參林藥業集團有限公司一半以上的股份。這使他們能夠有效控制公司。內部人士擁有這家180元人民幣公司價值120元人民幣的股份。太不尋常了!很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士是否在出售他們的任何股票。
General Public Ownership
普通公有制
With a 26% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
大參林製藥集團擁有26%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對大參林藥業集團有一定程度的影響力。儘管這種所有權規模可能不足以影響對他們有利的政策決定,但它們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 2 warning signs we've spotted with DaShenLin Pharmaceutical Group .
我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。爲此,你應該注意我們在大參林製藥集團發現的兩個警告信號。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但歸根結底,決定該業務所有者的表現的是未來,而不是過去。因此,我們認爲最好看一下這份免費報告,該報告顯示分析師是否在預測更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。