Shanghai Yaoji Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002605) Most Bullish Insider Is CEO Shuo Bin Yao, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 6.6% Last Week
Shanghai Yaoji Technology Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002605) Most Bullish Insider Is CEO Shuo Bin Yao, and Their Holdings Value Went up by 6.6% Last Week
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Shanghai Yaoji Technology's significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- 50% of the business is held by the top 6 shareholders
- Institutional ownership in Shanghai Yaoji Technology is 16%
- 上海耀基科技的大量內部所有權表明公司擴張的固有利益
- 50% 的業務由前 6 名股東持有
- 上海耀基科技的機構所有權爲16%
Every investor in Shanghai Yaoji Technology Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002605) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual insiders with 48% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
上海耀基科技股份有限公司(SZSE:002605)的每位投資者都應該了解最強大的股東群體。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有48%所有權的個人內部人士。換句話說,該集團將從對公司的投資中獲得最多(或損失最大)。
As a result, insiders were the biggest beneficiaries of last week's 6.6% gain.
結果,內部人士是上週6.6%漲幅的最大受益者。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Shanghai Yaoji Technology, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究上海耀基科技的每種所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shanghai Yaoji Technology?
關於上海耀基科技,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會變得更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會註冊一些機構,尤其是在它們成長的情況下。
We can see that Shanghai Yaoji Technology does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Shanghai Yaoji Technology's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到,上海耀基科技確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到上海耀基科技的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in Shanghai Yaoji Technology. The company's CEO Shuo Bin Yao is the largest shareholder with 17% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 13% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 8.9% by the third-largest shareholder.
對沖基金在上海耀基科技的股份不多。該公司首席執行官姚碩彬是最大股東,已發行股份爲17%。就背景而言,第二大股東持有約13%的已發行股份,其次是第三大股東持有8.9%的所有權。
We also observed that the top 6 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,前6名股東佔股份登記冊的一半以上,少數較小的股東在一定程度上平衡較大股東的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
儘管研究公司的機構所有權數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解公衆輿論也是有意義的。有很多分析師報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of Shanghai Yaoji Technology
上海耀基科技的內部所有權
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
公司內部人員的定義可能是主觀的,並且確實因司法管轄區而異。我們的數據反映了個別內部人士,至少涵蓋了董事會成員。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Shanghai Yaoji Technology Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥14b, and insiders have CN¥6.8b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.
我們的最新數據表明,內部人士擁有上海耀基科技有限公司的合理比例。它的市值僅爲140元人民幣,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值68元人民幣的股票。這非常重要。大多數人會很高興看到董事會與他們一起投資。您不妨訪問這張顯示內部人士近期交易的免費圖表。
General Public Ownership
普通公有制
With a 36% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Shanghai Yaoji Technology. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
上海耀基科技擁有 36% 的所有權,主要是個人投資者,在一定程度上對上海耀基科技有影響力。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Shanghai Yaoji Technology has 1 warning sign we think you should be aware of.
我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。以風險爲例——上海耀基科技有 1 個我們認爲你應該注意的警告標誌。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。