We Think Blade Air Mobility (NASDAQ:BLDE) Can Easily Afford To Drive Business Growth
We Think Blade Air Mobility (NASDAQ:BLDE) Can Easily Afford To Drive Business Growth
We can readily understand why investors are attracted to unprofitable companies. For example, although Amazon.com made losses for many years after listing, if you had bought and held the shares since 1999, you would have made a fortune. But while the successes are well known, investors should not ignore the very many unprofitable companies that simply burn through all their cash and collapse.
我們很容易理解爲什麼投資者會關注沒有盈利的公司。例如,儘管亞馬遜在上市後很多年都在虧損,但如果你從1999年開始買入並持有這些股票,你就會賺得盆滿鉢滿。然而,儘管成功的案例衆所周知,投資者也不應忽視那些只是不斷消耗現金並最終崩潰的衆多無盈利公司。
Given this risk, we thought we'd take a look at whether Blade Air Mobility (NASDAQ:BLDE) shareholders should be worried about its cash burn. In this report, we will consider the company's annual negative free cash flow, henceforth referring to it as the 'cash burn'. We'll start by comparing its cash burn with its cash reserves in order to calculate its cash runway.
考慮到這一風險,我們認爲有必要看看Blade Air Mobility(納斯達克:BLDE)的股東是否應該擔心公司的現金消耗。在本報告中,我們將考慮公司的年度負自由現金流,以下簡稱爲「現金消耗」。我們將首先比較其現金消耗與現金儲備,以計算其現金週轉期。
When Might Blade Air Mobility Run Out Of Money?
Blade Air Mobility何時可能會用盡資金?
A company's cash runway is the amount of time it would take to burn through its cash reserves at its current cash burn rate. When Blade Air Mobility last reported its September 2024 balance sheet in November 2024, it had zero debt and cash worth US$136m. In the last year, its cash burn was US$38m. That means it had a cash runway of about 3.6 years as of September 2024. Notably, however, analysts think that Blade Air Mobility will break even (at a free cash flow level) before then. In that case, it may never reach the end of its cash runway. The image below shows how its cash balance has been changing over the last few years.
公司的現金週轉期是指在當前現金消耗率下,消耗完其現金儲備所需的時間。當Blade Air Mobility在2024年11月最後報告其2024年9月的資產負債表時,它沒有債務,並且擁有價值13600萬美元的現金。在過去一年中,其現金消耗爲3800萬美元。這意味着截至2024年9月,它的現金週轉期約爲3.6年。然而,值得注意的是,分析師認爲Blade Air Mobility將在此之前實現盈虧平衡(在自由現金流水平)。在那種情況下,它可能永遠不會達到現金週轉期的盡頭。下面的圖像顯示了在過去幾年中其現金餘額的變化。
How Well Is Blade Air Mobility Growing?
Blade Air Mobility的成長情況如何?
At first glance it's a bit worrying to see that Blade Air Mobility actually boosted its cash burn by 11%, year on year. The revenue growth of 12% gives a ray of hope, at the very least. In light of the data above, we're fairly sanguine about the business growth trajectory. While the past is always worth studying, it is the future that matters most of all. So you might want to take a peek at how much the company is expected to grow in the next few years.
乍一看,Blade Air Mobility的現金消耗同比增加了11%,這有些令人擔憂。12%的營業收入增長至少帶來一線希望。在上述數據的背景下,我們對業務增長軌跡相當樂觀。雖然過去的情況總是值得研究,但未來才是最重要的。因此,你可能想看看公司預計在未來幾年內會增長多少。
Can Blade Air Mobility Raise More Cash Easily?
刀片航空出行是否能更容易地籌集到更多現金?
While Blade Air Mobility seems to be in a decent position, we reckon it is still worth thinking about how easily it could raise more cash, if that proved desirable. Generally speaking, a listed business can raise new cash through issuing shares or taking on debt. Many companies end up issuing new shares to fund future growth. By looking at a company's cash burn relative to its market capitalisation, we gain insight on how much shareholders would be diluted if the company needed to raise enough cash to cover another year's cash burn.
雖然刀片航空出行似乎處於一個不錯的位置,但我們認爲仍然值得考慮一下如果需要籌集更多現金的話,是否會很容易。一般來說,上市公司可以通過發行股票或增加債務來籌集新現金。許多公司最終會發行新股票來資助未來的增長。通過查看公司的現金消耗與其市值的比率,我們可以了解如果公司需要籌集足夠的現金來覆蓋另一個年度的現金消耗,股東會被稀釋多少。
Since it has a market capitalisation of US$327m, Blade Air Mobility's US$38m in cash burn equates to about 12% of its market value. Given that situation, it's fair to say the company wouldn't have much trouble raising more cash for growth, but shareholders would be somewhat diluted.
由於刀片航空出行的市值爲32700萬美元,其3800萬美元的現金消耗大約佔其市值的12%。鑑於這種情況,可以公平地說,公司在爲增長籌集更多現金方面不會遇到太大麻煩,但股東的股份會有所稀釋。
How Risky Is Blade Air Mobility's Cash Burn Situation?
刀片航空出行的現金消耗情況有多風險?
As you can probably tell by now, we're not too worried about Blade Air Mobility's cash burn. In particular, we think its cash runway stands out as evidence that the company is well on top of its spending. While its increasing cash burn wasn't great, the other factors mentioned in this article more than make up for weakness on that measure. There's no doubt that shareholders can take a lot of heart from the fact that analysts are forecasting it will reach breakeven before too long. Taking all the factors in this report into account, we're not at all worried about its cash burn, as the business appears well capitalized to spend as needs be. Readers need to have a sound understanding of business risks before investing in a stock, and we've spotted 3 warning signs for Blade Air Mobility that potential shareholders should take into account before putting money into a stock.
如您現在所能看出的,我們對刀片航空出行的現金消耗並不太擔心。尤其是,我們認爲其現金儲備情況突顯了公司對其支出的良好掌控。雖然其不斷增加的現金消耗並不理想,但本文提到的其他因素足以彌補這方面的不足。毫無疑問,股東們可以從分析師預測它很快將實現收支平衡的事實中獲得很多信心。考慮到本報告中的所有因素,我們對其現金消耗並不擔憂,因爲該業務似乎資本充足,能夠根據需求支出。讀者在投資股票之前需要對業務風險有深入的理解,我們發現刀片航空出行有3個警示信號,潛在股東應在投入資金之前考慮這些因素。
If you would prefer to check out another company with better fundamentals, then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt or this list of stocks which are all forecast to grow.
如果你更傾向於查看其他基本面更好的公司,那麼不要錯過這份有趣公司的免費列表,這些公司都有高投資回報率和低債務,或者這份預測增長的股票列表。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。