Retail Investors in Zhejiang Jinghua Laser Technology Co.,Ltd (SHSE:603607) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 15% Last Week
Retail Investors in Zhejiang Jinghua Laser Technology Co.,Ltd (SHSE:603607) Are Its Biggest Bettors, and Their Bets Paid off as Stock Gained 15% Last Week
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significant control over Zhejiang Jinghua Laser TechnologyLtd by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 51% of the business is held by the top 5 shareholders
- 27% of Zhejiang Jinghua Laser TechnologyLtd is held by insiders
- 散戶投資者對浙江晶華激光科技有限公司的重大控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
- 51% 的業務由前五名股東持有
- 浙江晶華激光科技有限公司27%的股份由內部人士持有
A look at the shareholders of Zhejiang Jinghua Laser Technology Co.,Ltd (SHSE:603607) can tell us which group is most powerful. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are retail investors with 42% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
看看浙江晶華激光科技股份有限公司的股東, Ltd(上海證券交易所代碼:603607)可以告訴我們哪個集團最強大。而持有最大份額的群體是擁有42%所有權的散戶投資者。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As a result, retail investors collectively scored the highest last week as the company hit CN¥3.7b market cap following a 15% gain in the stock.
結果,散戶投資者上週集體得分最高,該公司的市值在股價上漲15%後達到37元人民幣。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Zhejiang Jinghua Laser TechnologyLtd.
在下圖中,我們放大了浙江晶華激光科技有限公司的不同所有權群體。
What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zhejiang Jinghua Laser TechnologyLtd?
關於浙江晶華激光科技股份有限公司,缺乏機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.
機構投資者通常會避開規模太小、流動性太差或風險太大的公司。但是,大型公司沒有任何機構投資者是不尋常的。
There could be various reasons why no institutions own shares in a company. Typically, small, newly listed companies don't attract much attention from fund managers, because it would not be possible for large fund managers to build a meaningful position in the company. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Zhejiang Jinghua Laser TechnologyLtd might not have the sort of past performance institutions are looking for, or perhaps they simply have not studied the business closely.
沒有機構擁有公司股份的原因可能多種多樣。通常,小型的新上市公司不會引起基金經理的太多關注,因爲大型基金經理不可能在公司中建立有意義的地位。或者,該公司的某些方面可能使機構投資者望而卻步。浙江晶華激光科技有限公司可能沒有機構想要的那種過去的業績,或者他們可能只是沒有仔細研究該業務。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Zhejiang Jinghua Laser TechnologyLtd. Our data shows that Zhejiang Xingsheng Investment Management Co., Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 32% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 13% and 2.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Jian Cheng Sun, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對浙江晶華激光科技有限公司進行有意義的投資。我們的數據顯示,浙江興盛投資管理有限公司是最大股東,已發行股份的32%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的13%和2.7%。第二大股東孫建成也恰好擁有首席執行官的頭銜。
On looking further, we found that 51% of the shares are owned by the top 5 shareholders. In other words, these shareholders have a meaningful say in the decisions of the company.
進一步觀察,我們發現51%的股份由前五名股東擁有。換句話說,這些股東在公司的決策中有有意義的發言權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Our information suggests that there isn't any analyst coverage of the stock, so it is probably little known.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目標。我們的信息表明,分析師對該股沒有任何報道,因此可能鮮爲人知。
Insider Ownership Of Zhejiang Jinghua Laser TechnologyLtd
浙江晶華激光科技有限公司的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
儘管內部人員的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部所有權是積極的,因爲這可能表明董事會與其他股東的關係良好。但是,在某些情況下,過多的權力集中在該群體中。
It seems insiders own a significant proportion of Zhejiang Jinghua Laser Technology Co.,Ltd. Insiders have a CN¥982m stake in this CN¥3.7b business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
看來內部人士擁有浙江晶華激光科技有限公司的很大一部分股份。, Ltd. 內部人士在這項37元人民幣的業務中持有98200萬元人民幣的股份。我們可以說這表明了與股東的一致性,但值得注意的是,該公司仍然很小;一些內部人士可能已經創立了該公司。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
普通公有制
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 42% stake in Zhejiang Jinghua Laser TechnologyLtd. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆通常是個人投資者,持有浙江晶華激光科技有限公司42%的股份。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Equity Ownership
私募股權所有權
Private equity firms hold a 32% stake in Zhejiang Jinghua Laser TechnologyLtd. This suggests they can be influential in key policy decisions. Sometimes we see private equity stick around for the long term, but generally speaking they have a shorter investment horizon and -- as the name suggests -- don't invest in public companies much. After some time they may look to sell and redeploy capital elsewhere.
私募股權公司持有浙江晶華激光科技有限公司32%的股份。這表明他們可以在關鍵政策決策中發揮影響力。有時我們會看到私募股權長期存在,但總的來說,它們的投資期限較短,而且顧名思義,對上市公司的投資並不多。一段時間後,他們可能會考慮出售資本並將其重新部署到其他地方。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Zhejiang Jinghua Laser TechnologyLtd is showing 2 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those is a bit unpleasant...
儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。請注意,浙江晶華激光科技有限公司在我們的投資分析中顯示了兩個警告信號,其中一個有點令人不快...
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
當然,通過尋找其他地方,你可能會找到一項不錯的投資。因此,來看看這份有趣的公司免費清單。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。