Individual Investors Own 39% of BGI Genomics Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300676) Shares but Private Companies Control 49% of the Company
Individual Investors Own 39% of BGI Genomics Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300676) Shares but Private Companies Control 49% of the Company
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- BGI Genomics' significant private companies ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public
- The top 3 shareholders own 52% of the company
- Institutional ownership in BGI Genomics is 10%
- 華大基因的重大私營公司股權表明,關鍵決策受到較大公衆股東的影響。
- 前3大股東擁有公司52%的股份
- 華大基因的機構持股比例爲10%。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of BGI Genomics Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300676), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 49% stake, private companies possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
要了解誰真正控制着華大基因股份有限公司(SZSE:300676),理解其業務的所有權結構非常重要。私營公司持有49%的股份,是該公司最大股東。換句話說,該集團面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
Meanwhile, individual investors make up 39% of the company's shareholders.
同時,個人投資者佔公司的股東比例爲39%。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of BGI Genomics, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們深入探討華大基因每種所有者的情況,從下面的圖表開始。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About BGI Genomics?
機構持股對華大基因意味着什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in BGI Genomics. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at BGI Genomics' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
正如你所看到的,機構投資者在華大基因中擁有相當份額。這表明專業投資者之間的某種可信度。但我們不能單單依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會做出糟糕的投資,就像每個人一樣。如果多家機構同時改變對某隻股票的看法,可能會迅速導致股價下跌。因此,查看華大基因的歷史盈利情況是有價值的。當然,真正重要的是未來。
Hedge funds don't have many shares in BGI Genomics. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Shenzhen Huada Gene Technology Co., Ltd. with 40% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 9.0% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 2.4% by the third-largest shareholder.
對沖基金在華大基因的持股不多。根據我們的數據,最大股東是深圳華大基因科技有限公司,持有40%的流通股份。作爲對比,第二大股東持有大約9.0%的流通股份,第三大股東的持股爲2.4%。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了讓我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前三大股東在公司中擁有多數股權,意味着他們有足夠的權力影響公司的決策。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. We're not picking up on any analyst coverage of the stock at the moment, so the company is unlikely to be widely held.
研究機構持股是評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。 通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。 目前我們沒有發現對該股票的分析師覆蓋,因此該公司的持股不太可能廣泛。
Insider Ownership Of BGI Genomics
華大基因的內部持股
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算作內部人。公司管理層負責運營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會的成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can report that insiders do own shares in BGI Genomics Co., Ltd.. It is a pretty big company, so it is generally a positive to see some potentially meaningful alignment. In this case, they own around CN¥197m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們可以報告內部人士確實擁有華大基因有限公司的股份。它是一家相當大的公司,因此看到一些潛在的重要對齊通常是積極的。在這種情況下,他們擁有約19700萬人民幣的股份(按當前價格計算)。看到內部人士有這樣的投資水平是好的。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否有買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 39% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
公衆,包括散戶投資者,擁有該公司39%的股份,因此他們不能輕易被忽視。這種所有權的規模雖然相當可觀,但如果決定與其他大型股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
We can see that Private Companies own 49%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
我們可以看到私人公司擁有49%的流通股份。私人公司可能是關聯方。有時內部人士通過持有私人公司的股份而對上市公司有利益,而不是以個人身份。雖然很難得出任何寬泛的結論,但值得注意的是這是一個進一步研究的領域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that BGI Genomics is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
雖然考慮擁有一家公司的不同群體非常重要,但還有其他因素更爲重要。請注意,華大基因在我們的投資分析中顯示出1個警示信號,您應該了解...
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, backed by strong financial data.
如果你更傾向於查看另一家公司——一家有潛在優越財務狀況的公司——那麼請不要錯過這份由強大財務數據支持的有趣公司免費名單。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。