Celanese Corporation (NYSE:CE) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 89% of the Company
Celanese Corporation (NYSE:CE) Is Favoured by Institutional Owners Who Hold 89% of the Company
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Institutions' substantial holdings in Celanese implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price
- 51% of the business is held by the top 7 shareholders
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 機構對Celanese的巨額持股意味着他們對公司股價有重要影響。
- 51%的業務由前7大股東持有
- 分析師的預測以及持有數據有助於強烈理解業務的前景
If you want to know who really controls Celanese Corporation (NYSE:CE), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 89% to be precise, is institutions. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
如果你想知道誰真正控制着Celanese公司(紐交所:CE),那麼你需要查看其股份登記的組成情況。 持有公司最多股份的團體,準確來說,大約佔89%,就是機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該團體將受益最多(如果出現下跌,則損失最多)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
因爲機構股東擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策通常會受到重視,尤其是對於個人投資者。因此,投資於公司的大量機構資金通常代表着對其未來的巨大信心。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Celanese.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於Celanese的信息。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Celanese?
機構持股能告訴我們什麼關於Celanese?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
We can see that Celanese does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Celanese's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到Celanese確實有機構投資者;他們持有公司相當一部分的股票。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經關注了該股票,並且他們喜歡它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能錯了。如果多個機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,看看下面Celanese的盈利歷史是很有價值的。當然,未來才是最重要的。

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Celanese. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 12%. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 10% and 8.7%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
投資者應該注意,機構實際上擁有公司一半以上的股份,因此他們可以共同擁有顯著的權力。對沖基金在Celanese的股份不多。公司的最大股東是先鋒集團(The Vanguard Group, Inc.),持有12%的股份。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有10%和8.7%的流通股份。
We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進一步調查發現,前七大股東佔註冊股東的大約51%,這意味着除了大股東外,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了彼此的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構的持有情況是判斷和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。目前有合理數量的分析師在覆蓋此股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有用。
Insider Ownership Of Celanese
Celanese的內部股東持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算作內部人。公司管理層負責運營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會的成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。
Our information suggests that Celanese Corporation insiders own under 1% of the company. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$31m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們的信息顯示,塞拉尼斯公司的內部人士擁有不到1%的股份。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士持有價值3100萬美元的股份。絕對值可能比比例股份更重要。看到至少一些內部持股總是好的,但查詢這些內部人士是否在出售股份可能是值得的。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 10% stake in Celanese. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有塞拉尼斯10%的股份。雖然這個群體不一定能夠決定,但它確實可以對公司的運行產生實際影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Case in point: We've spotted 3 warning signs for Celanese you should be aware of, and 1 of them is potentially serious.
我發現查看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但爲了真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。 例如:我們發現了 3 個針對Celanese的警告信號,你應該注意,其中一個可能很嚴重。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。