Private Companies Invested in Zhejiang Wolwo Bio-Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300357) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥372m Market Cap Decline
Private Companies Invested in Zhejiang Wolwo Bio-Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300357) Copped the Brunt of Last Week's CN¥372m Market Cap Decline
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significant control over Zhejiang Wolwo Bio-Pharmaceutical by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- The top 3 shareholders own 52% of the company
- Insider ownership in Zhejiang Wolwo Bio-Pharmaceutical is 11%
- 私營公司對浙江沃沃生物製藥的重大控制意味着公衆擁有更大的影響管理和治理相關決策的權力
- 前三名股東擁有公司52%的股份
- 浙江沃爾沃生物製藥的內部所有權爲11%
If you want to know who really controls Zhejiang Wolwo Bio-Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (SZSE:300357), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 39% to be precise, is private companies. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道誰真正控制着浙江沃爾沃生物製藥有限公司(SZSE: 300357),那麼你必須看看其股票登記處的構成。持有該公司股份最多的集團是私營公司,準確地說約爲39%。換句話說,該集團面臨最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
As a result, private companies as a group endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by CN¥372m.
結果,在市值下降37200萬元人民幣之後,私營公司作爲一個整體承受了最大的損失。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Zhejiang Wolwo Bio-Pharmaceutical, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究浙江沃爾沃生物製藥的每種所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Zhejiang Wolwo Bio-Pharmaceutical?
關於浙江沃沃生物製藥,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會變得更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會註冊一些機構,尤其是在它們成長的情況下。
As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Zhejiang Wolwo Bio-Pharmaceutical. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Zhejiang Wolwo Bio-Pharmaceutical's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
如您所見,機構投資者持有浙江沃沃生物製藥的大量股份。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這個事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到浙江沃沃生物製藥的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Zhejiang Wolwo Bio-Pharmaceutical. Zhejiang Wolwo Management Consulting Co., Ltd. is currently the company's largest shareholder with 39% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.3% and 5.0%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Gengxi Hu, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Chief Executive Officer.
我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對浙江沃爾沃生物製藥進行有意義的投資。浙江沃爾沃管理諮詢有限公司目前是該公司的最大股東,已發行股份的39%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的8.3%和5.0%。第二大股東胡庚喜也恰好擁有首席執行官的頭銜。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 3 shareholders have a majority ownership in the company, meaning that they are powerful enough to influence the decisions of the company.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前三名股東擁有公司的多數股權,這意味着他們足夠強大,足以影響公司的決策。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構所有權是衡量和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目標。有合理數量的分析師報道該股,因此了解他們對未來的總體看法可能會很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Zhejiang Wolwo Bio-Pharmaceutical
浙江沃爾沃生物製藥的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
儘管內部人員的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部所有權表明領導層像公司的真正所有者一樣思考時,內部所有權是積極的。但是,高內部所有權也可以賦予公司內部一小部分人巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Zhejiang Wolwo Bio-Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful CN¥1.3b stake in this CN¥12b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們的最新數據表明,內部人士持有浙江沃沃生物製藥有限公司合理比例的股份。有趣的是,內部人士在這項120元人民幣的業務中擁有13元人民幣的大量股份。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
普通公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 33% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司33%的股份,因此不容忽視。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Private Company Ownership
私人公司所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 39%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.
我們的數據顯示,私營公司持有公司39%的股份。可能值得對此進行更深入的研究。如果關聯方,例如內部人士,對其中一傢俬營公司有興趣,則應在年度報告中予以披露。私營公司也可能在公司中擁有戰略利益。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 2 warning signs for Zhejiang Wolwo Bio-Pharmaceutical you should be aware of.
儘管值得考慮擁有公司的不同群體,但還有其他因素更爲重要。一個很好的例子:我們發現了你應該注意的浙江沃爾沃生物製藥的兩個警告信號。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall ST 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。