We Think Lancy (SZSE:002612) Can Stay On Top Of Its Debt
We Think Lancy (SZSE:002612) Can Stay On Top Of Its Debt
Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. As with many other companies Lancy Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002612) makes use of debt. But the real question is whether this debt is making the company risky.
霍華德·馬克斯說得好,他說的不是擔心股價的波動,而是 「永久損失的可能性是我擔心的風險... 也是我認識的每位實際投資者所擔心的風險。」當你檢查公司的資產負債表的風險時,考慮它的資產負債表是很自然的,因爲企業倒閉時通常會涉及債務。與許多其他公司一樣,蘭西有限公司(深圳證券交易所:002612)也使用債務。但真正的問題是這筆債務是否使公司面臨風險。
What Risk Does Debt Bring?
債務帶來什麼風險?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. If things get really bad, the lenders can take control of the business. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. The first step when considering a company's debt levels is to consider its cash and debt together.
當企業無法通過自由現金流或以誘人的價格籌集資金來輕鬆履行這些義務時,債務和其他負債就會成爲風險。如果情況變得非常糟糕,貸款人可以控制業務。儘管這種情況並不常見,但我們經常會看到負債公司永久稀釋股東,因爲貸款人迫使他們以不良价格籌集資金。當然,債務的好處在於它通常代表廉價資本,尤其是當它以高回報率進行再投資的能力取代公司的稀釋時。考慮公司的債務水平的第一步是同時考慮其現金和債務。
How Much Debt Does Lancy Carry?
蘭西揹負了多少債務?
You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that as of September 2024 Lancy had CN¥1.52b of debt, an increase on CN¥931.4m, over one year. However, it does have CN¥644.7m in cash offsetting this, leading to net debt of about CN¥872.3m.
你可以點擊下圖查看歷史數字,但它顯示,截至2024年9月,蘭西的債務在一年內增加了15.2元人民幣,比93140萬加元人民幣有所增加。但是,它確實有64470萬元的現金抵消了這一點,因此淨負債約爲87230萬元人民幣。
A Look At Lancy's Liabilities
看看蘭西的負債
According to the last reported balance sheet, Lancy had liabilities of CN¥3.07b due within 12 months, and liabilities of CN¥1.41b due beyond 12 months. On the other hand, it had cash of CN¥644.7m and CN¥280.3m worth of receivables due within a year. So its liabilities outweigh the sum of its cash and (near-term) receivables by CN¥3.55b.
根據上次報告的資產負債表,蘭西的負債爲30.7元人民幣,12個月後到期的負債爲14.1元人民幣。另一方面,它有一年內到期的64470萬元現金和價值28030萬元人民幣的應收賬款。因此,其負債超過其現金和(短期)應收賬款總額35.5元人民幣。
Lancy has a market capitalization of CN¥8.69b, so it could very likely raise cash to ameliorate its balance sheet, if the need arose. But we definitely want to keep our eyes open to indications that its debt is bringing too much risk.
蘭西的市值爲86.9元人民幣,因此,如果需要,它很可能會籌集資金以改善資產負債表。但是,我們絕對希望留意其債務帶來過大風險的跡象。
We measure a company's debt load relative to its earnings power by looking at its net debt divided by its earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) and by calculating how easily its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) cover its interest expense (interest cover). This way, we consider both the absolute quantum of the debt, as well as the interest rates paid on it.
我們通過以下方法來衡量公司的債務負擔與其盈利能力的關係:其淨負債除以未計利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),並計算其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)彌補利息支出(利息保障)的難易程度。這樣,我們既要考慮債務的絕對數量,也要考慮爲其支付的利率。
Lancy's net debt of 2.1 times EBITDA suggests graceful use of debt. And the fact that its trailing twelve months of EBIT was 7.4 times its interest expenses harmonizes with that theme. If Lancy can keep growing EBIT at last year's rate of 12% over the last year, then it will find its debt load easier to manage. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Lancy can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting.
蘭西的淨負債爲息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的2.1倍,這表明債務的合理使用。而且,其過去十二個月的息稅前利潤是其利息支出的7.4倍,這一事實與這一主題一致。如果蘭西能夠以去年的12%的速度繼續增長息稅前利潤,那麼它將發現其債務負擔更易於管理。毫無疑問,我們從資產負債表中學到的關於債務的知識最多。但最終,該業務的未來盈利能力將決定蘭西能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果你想看看專業人士的想法,你可能會發現這份關於分析師利潤預測的免費報告很有趣。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So it's worth checking how much of that EBIT is backed by free cash flow. Over the last three years, Lancy actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. That sort of strong cash conversion gets us as excited as the crowd when the beat drops at a Daft Punk concert.
最後,企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤根本無法減少債務。因此,值得檢查一下該息稅前利潤中有多少是由自由現金流支持的。在過去的三年中,蘭西產生的自由現金流實際上超過了息稅前利潤。當Daft Punk音樂會的節拍下降時,這種強勁的現金轉換讓我們和觀衆一樣興奮。
Our View
我們的觀點
The good news is that Lancy's demonstrated ability to convert EBIT to free cash flow delights us like a fluffy puppy does a toddler. And its EBIT growth rate is good too. All these things considered, it appears that Lancy can comfortably handle its current debt levels. On the plus side, this leverage can boost shareholder returns, but the potential downside is more risk of loss, so it's worth monitoring the balance sheet. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Lancy that you should be aware of.
好消息是,蘭西表現出的將息稅前利潤轉換爲自由現金流的能力使我們感到高興,就像毛茸茸的小狗對待幼兒一樣。而且它的息稅前利潤增長率也很好。考慮到所有這些因素,蘭西似乎可以輕鬆應對其當前的債務水平。從好的方面來看,這種槓桿作用可以提高股東的回報,但潛在的缺點是損失風險更大,因此值得關注資產負債表。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但是,並非所有的投資風險都存在於資產負債表中,遠非如此。例如,我們已經爲 Lancy 確定了 1 個警告標誌,你應該注意這一點。
When all is said and done, sometimes its easier to focus on companies that don't even need debt. Readers can access a list of growth stocks with zero net debt 100% free, right now.
當一切都說完之後,有時更容易將注意力集中在甚至不需要債務的公司身上。讀者現在可以免費訪問淨負債爲零的成長型股票清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall ST 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。