C.H. Robinson Worldwide (NASDAQ:CHRW) May Have Issues Allocating Its Capital
C.H. Robinson Worldwide (NASDAQ:CHRW) May Have Issues Allocating Its Capital
What underlying fundamental trends can indicate that a company might be in decline? Businesses in decline often have two underlying trends, firstly, a declining return on capital employed (ROCE) and a declining base of capital employed. Basically the company is earning less on its investments and it is also reducing its total assets. On that note, looking into C.H. Robinson Worldwide (NASDAQ:CHRW), we weren't too upbeat about how things were going.
哪些潛在的基本面趨勢可以表明公司可能正在衰退?衰退的企業通常有兩個潛在趨勢,第一,使用資本回報率(ROCE)下降和已動用資本基礎下降。基本上,該公司的投資收入減少了,而且總資產也在減少。就此而言,縱觀C.H. Robinson Worldwide(納斯達克股票代碼:CHRW),我們對事情的發展並不太樂觀。
Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)
了解已動用資本回報率 (ROCE)
For those that aren't sure what ROCE is, it measures the amount of pre-tax profits a company can generate from the capital employed in its business. To calculate this metric for C.H. Robinson Worldwide, this is the formula:
對於那些不確定ROCE是什麼的人,它衡量的是公司從其業務中使用的資本中可以產生的稅前利潤金額。要計算 C.H. Robinson Worldwide 的這個指標,公式如下:
Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)
已動用資本回報率 = 息稅前收益(EBIT)÷(總資產-流動負債)
0.19 = US$625m ÷ (US$5.6b - US$2.2b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
0.19 = 6.25億美元 ÷(56億美元至22億美元)(基於截至2024年9月的過去十二個月)。
Therefore, C.H. Robinson Worldwide has an ROCE of 19%. On its own, that's a standard return, however it's much better than the 13% generated by the Logistics industry.
因此,C.H. Robinson Worldwide的投資回報率爲19%。就其本身而言,這是標準回報,但比物流行業產生的13%要好得多。
In the above chart we have measured C.H. Robinson Worldwide's prior ROCE against its prior performance, but the future is arguably more important. If you'd like, you can check out the forecasts from the analysts covering C.H. Robinson Worldwide for free.
在上圖中,我們對比了C.H. Robinson Worldwide之前的投資回報率,但可以說,未來更爲重要。如果你願意,你可以免費查看報道C.H. Robinson Worldwide的分析師的預測。
What Can We Tell From C.H. Robinson Worldwide's ROCE Trend?
我們可以從 C.H. Robinson Worldwide 的 ROCE 趨勢中得出什麼?
In terms of C.H. Robinson Worldwide's historical ROCE movements, the trend doesn't inspire confidence. Unfortunately the returns on capital have diminished from the 28% that they were earning five years ago. On top of that, it's worth noting that the amount of capital employed within the business has remained relatively steady. This combination can be indicative of a mature business that still has areas to deploy capital, but the returns received aren't as high due potentially to new competition or smaller margins. If these trends continue, we wouldn't expect C.H. Robinson Worldwide to turn into a multi-bagger.
就C.H. Robinson Worldwide的歷史性ROCE運動而言,這一趨勢並不能激發信心。不幸的是,資本回報率已從五年前的28%有所下降。最重要的是,值得注意的是,企業內部使用的資本量一直保持相對穩定。這種組合可能表明一家成熟的企業仍有資金部署的領域,但由於新的競爭或利潤率降低,獲得的回報並不那麼高。如果這些趨勢繼續下去,我們預計C.H. Robinson Worldwide不會變成一個多袋公司。
What We Can Learn From C.H. Robinson Worldwide's ROCE
我們可以從 C.H. Robinson Worldwide 的 ROCE 中學到什麼
In the end, the trend of lower returns on the same amount of capital isn't typically an indication that we're looking at a growth stock. But investors must be expecting an improvement of sorts because over the last five yearsthe stock has delivered a respectable 64% return. Regardless, we don't feel too comfortable with the fundamentals so we'd be steering clear of this stock for now.
歸根結底,相同數量的資本回報率下降的趨勢通常並不表示我們正在考慮成長型股票。但是投資者一定會期待某種程度的改善,因爲在過去五年中,該股的回報率爲64%。無論如何,我們對基本面不太滿意,因此我們暫時會避開這隻股票。
C.H. Robinson Worldwide does have some risks, we noticed 2 warning signs (and 1 which shouldn't be ignored) we think you should know about.
C.H. Robinson Worldwide確實存在一些風險,我們注意到兩個警告信號(還有一個不容忽視的),我們認爲你應該知道。
While C.H. Robinson Worldwide may not currently earn the highest returns, we've compiled a list of companies that currently earn more than 25% return on equity. Check out this free list here.
儘管C.H. Robinson Worldwide目前可能無法獲得最高的回報,但我們編制了一份目前股本回報率超過25%的公司名單。在這裏查看這個免費清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。