With A Return On Equity Of 8.6%, Has Evergy, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:EVRG) Management Done Well?
With A Return On Equity Of 8.6%, Has Evergy, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:EVRG) Management Done Well?
While some investors are already well versed in financial metrics (hat tip), this article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE) and why it is important. We'll use ROE to examine Evergy, Inc. (NASDAQ:EVRG), by way of a worked example.
雖然有些投資者已經對財務指標很熟悉(感謝提示),但本文是爲了那些希望了解股本回報率(ROE)及其重要性的人準備的。我們將通過一個實際例子來用ROE分析西星能源公司(納斯達克:EVRG)。
Return on equity or ROE is a key measure used to assess how efficiently a company's management is utilizing the company's capital. Put another way, it reveals the company's success at turning shareholder investments into profits.
股本回報率(ROE)是用於評估公司管理層如何有效利用公司資本的關鍵指標。換句話說,它揭示了公司將股東投資轉化爲利潤的成功程度。
How Is ROE Calculated?
淨資產收益率怎麼計算?
Return on equity can be calculated by using the formula:
淨資產收益率可以通過以下公式計算:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
股東權益回報率 = 淨利潤(來自持續運營)÷ 股東權益
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Evergy is:
因此,基於上述公式,西星能源的ROE爲:
8.6% = US$866m ÷ US$10b (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
8.6% = 86600萬美元 ÷ 100億美金(基於截至2024年9月的過去十二個月)。
The 'return' refers to a company's earnings over the last year. Another way to think of that is that for every $1 worth of equity, the company was able to earn $0.09 in profit.
『回報』是指公司在過去一年的收益。另一種理解方式是,對於每1美元的股本,該公司能夠賺取0.09美元的利潤。
Does Evergy Have A Good ROE?
Evergy的 ROE 是否優秀?
By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. The limitation of this approach is that some companies are quite different from others, even within the same industry classification. The image below shows that Evergy has an ROE that is roughly in line with the Electric Utilities industry average (9.3%).
通過將公司的 ROE 與其行業平均水平進行比較,我們可以快速衡量其優劣。 這種方法的侷限性在於,即便是在同一行業分類內,不同公司的情況也可能相差很大。 下圖顯示,Evergy的 ROE 大致與公用股行業平均水平(9.3%)相符。
So while the ROE is not exceptional, at least its acceptable. While at least the ROE is not lower than the industry, its still worth checking what role the company's debt plays as high debt levels relative to equity may also make the ROE appear high. If true, then it is more an indication of risk than the potential. You can see the 3 risks we have identified for Evergy by visiting our risks dashboard for free on our platform here.
因此,儘管 ROE 不算特別優秀,但至少是可以接受的。 儘管 ROE 至少不低於行業水平,但仍值得檢查公司債務所起的作用,因爲較高的債務水平相對於股本可能會使 ROE 看起來很高。 如果確實如此,那麼這更多是風險的指示,而不是潛力的體現。您可以通過訪問我們平台上的風險特斯拉-儀表,免費查看我們爲Evergy識別的3個風險。
How Does Debt Impact Return On Equity?
債務如何影響淨利潤回報率?
Virtually all companies need money to invest in the business, to grow profits. The cash for investment can come from prior year profits (retained earnings), issuing new shares, or borrowing. In the first and second cases, the ROE will reflect this use of cash for investment in the business. In the latter case, the debt used for growth will improve returns, but won't affect the total equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used.
幾乎所有公司都需要資金投資於業務,以實現利潤增長。 投資所需的現金可以來自於前一年的利潤(留存收益)、發行新股或借款。在前兩種情況下,ROE 將反映這種用於業務投資的現金使用。在後者的情況下,用於增長的債務將改善回報,但不會影響總股本。這將使 ROE 看起來比沒有使用債務時更好。
Evergy's Debt And Its 8.6% ROE
西星能源的債務和8.6%的ROE
Evergy does use a high amount of debt to increase returns. It has a debt to equity ratio of 1.37. The combination of a rather low ROE and significant use of debt is not particularly appealing. Debt increases risk and reduces options for the company in the future, so you generally want to see some good returns from using it.
西星能源確實使用大量債務來提高回報。它的債務與股本比率爲1.37。相對較低的ROE和顯著使用債務的結合並不特別吸引人。債務增加了風險,並減少了公司未來的選擇,因此您通常希望看到一些良好的回報。
Conclusion
結論
Return on equity is one way we can compare its business quality of different companies. A company that can achieve a high return on equity without debt could be considered a high quality business. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.
股本回報率是我們比較不同公司業務質量的一種方式。一個能夠在沒有債務的情況下實現高股本回報率的公司可以被視爲高質量的業務。如果兩家公司債務與股本的比率大致相同,而一家的ROE更高,我通常會偏好ROE更高的那家。
But ROE is just one piece of a bigger puzzle, since high quality businesses often trade on high multiples of earnings. The rate at which profits are likely to grow, relative to the expectations of profit growth reflected in the current price, must be considered, too. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
但是ROE只是更大拼圖中的一部分,因爲高質量的企業往往以高倍數的收入交易。相對於當前價格中反映的利潤增長預期,利潤可能增長的速率也必須考慮。因此,我認爲檢查一下有關該公司的分析師預測的免費報告可能是值得的。
Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.
當然,你可能會在其他地方找到一個了不起的投資機會。所以查看一下這個有趣公司的免費清單。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall St的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall St在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。