Avista Corporation (NYSE:AVA) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 88% of the Company
Avista Corporation (NYSE:AVA) Is Largely Controlled by Institutional Shareholders Who Own 88% of the Company
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Avista's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 8 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership
- Analyst forecasts along with ownership data serve to give a strong idea about prospects for a business
- 顯著高的機構持有比例意味着阿維斯塔的股票價格對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
- 共有8位投資者在公司中佔有多數股權,持有52%的股份。
- 分析師的預測以及持有數據有助於強烈理解業務的前景
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Avista Corporation (NYSE:AVA), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 88% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正控制着阿維斯塔公司(紐交所:AVA),理解業務的所有權結構至關重要。持有最大份額的是機構,持有88%的股份。換句話說,該群體從對公司的投資中獲益最多(或損失最多)。
Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Therefore, a good portion of institutional money invested in the company is usually a huge vote of confidence on its future.
因爲機構股東擁有龐大的資源和流動性,他們的投資決策通常會受到重視,尤其是對於個人投資者。因此,投資於公司的大量機構資金通常代表着對其未來的巨大信心。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Avista.
在下面的圖表中,我們放大了阿維斯塔的不同持股群體。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Avista?
機構持股告訴我們關於阿維斯塔什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
Avista already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Avista's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
阿維斯塔的股權登記中已經有機構存在。實際上,他們在公司中擁有可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師已經研究過這隻股票,並且他們喜歡它。但和其他任何人一樣,他們也可能會錯。如果多個機構同時改變對一隻股票的看法,股價可能會迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面阿維斯塔的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Avista. BlackRock, Inc. is currently the largest shareholder, with 19% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 13% and 5.9% of the stock.
機構投資者擁有超過50%的公司股份,因此他們可以共同強有力地影響董事會決策。我們注意到對阿維斯塔並沒有重要投資的對沖基金。貝萊德目前是最大股東,持有19%的流通股。相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約13%和5.9%的股票。
We did some more digging and found that 8 of the top shareholders account for roughly 52% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.
我們進行了更深入的挖掘,發現前8大股東大致佔據了52%的註冊股份,暗示着除了大股東外,還有一些小股東,從而在一定程度上平衡了各自的利益。
While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
雖然研究一家公司的機構持股數據是有意義的,但研究分析師的情緒以了解市場趨勢同樣也是有意義的。現在有相當多的分析師關注這隻股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會很有用。
Insider Ownership Of Avista
阿維斯塔的內部持股
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人士的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同法域之間有所不同。我們的數據顯示個人內部人士,至少捕獲了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員本身就是董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Avista Corporation. Keep in mind that it's a big company, and the insiders own US$26m worth of shares. The absolute value might be more important than the proportional share. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.
我們最近的數據表明,內部人士持有阿維斯塔公司的股份不足1%。請記住,這是一家大公司,內部人士持有價值2600萬美元的股票。絕對值可能比比例股權更重要。看到至少一些內部人士持股總是好的,但值得檢查那些內部人士是否在出售。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 11% stake in Avista. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有阿維斯塔11%的股份。雖然這一群體不能決定一切,但他們確實可以對公司的運行產生實際影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Avista (at least 1 which is significant) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.
我發現了解誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是要真正深入了解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。考慮到投資風險這一始終存在的陰影,我們已識別出阿維斯塔的三個警告信號(至少有一個是顯著的),理解它們應該是你投資過程中不可或缺的一部分。
Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
最終,未來是最重要的。您可以訪問此免費的關於公司分析師預測的報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。