Following Recent Decline, Sangfor Technologies Inc.'s (SZSE:300454) Top Shareholder CEO Chaoxi He Sees Holdings Value Drop by 3.0%
Following Recent Decline, Sangfor Technologies Inc.'s (SZSE:300454) Top Shareholder CEO Chaoxi He Sees Holdings Value Drop by 3.0%
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Sangfor Technologies' significant insider ownership suggests inherent interests in company's expansion
- A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership
- Institutions own 15% of Sangfor Technologies
- Sangfor Technologies的大量內部所有權表明了公司擴張的固有利益
- 共有5名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲51%
- 機構擁有桑福科技15%的股份
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Sangfor Technologies Inc. (SZSE:300454), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 46% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制了Sangfor Technologies Inc.(深圳證券交易所代碼:300454),了解該業務的所有權結構非常重要。個人內部人士擁有46%的股份,是公司的最大股份。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果股價下跌,則損失最大)。
As market cap fell to CN¥26b last week, insiders would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
隨着上週市值跌至260元人民幣,內部人士面臨的損失將是該公司任何其他股東群體中最高的。
Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Sangfor Technologies, beginning with the chart below.
讓我們從下圖開始,深入研究Sangfor Technologies的每種所有者。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Sangfor Technologies?
關於Sangfor Technologies,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與常用指數的回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮收購包含在相關基準指數中的大型公司。
We can see that Sangfor Technologies does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Sangfor Technologies' earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
我們可以看到,Sangfor Technologies確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這可能表明該公司在投資界具有一定程度的信譽。但是,最好謹慎行事,不要依賴機構投資者所謂的驗證。他們也是,有時候會弄錯。如果多家機構同時改變對股票的看法,你可能會看到股價快速下跌。因此,值得在下面查看Sangfor Technologies的收益記錄。當然,未來才是真正重要的。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Sangfor Technologies. The company's CEO Chaoxi He is the largest shareholder with 20% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 18% and 8.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. Note that two of the top three shareholders are also Senior Key Executive and Member of the Board of Directors, respectively, once again pointing to significant ownership by company insiders.
我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Sangfor Technologies進行有意義的投資。該公司首席執行官何朝喜是最大股東,已發行股份的20%。同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有已發行股份的18%和8.1%。請注意,前三名股東中有兩位也是高級主要高管和董事會成員,這再次表明公司內部人士擁有大量股權。
After doing some more digging, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company's shares which essentially means that there is concentrated ownership amongst the top shareholders, most of whom happen to be insiders!
經過更多挖掘,我們發現前五名股東控制着公司一半以上的股份,這實質上意味着所有權集中在頭號股東中,其中大多數恰好是內部人士!
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲你的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種很好的做法。有不少分析師報道了該股,因此您可以很容易地研究預測的增長。
Insider Ownership Of Sangfor Technologies
桑福科技的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
儘管內部人員的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。管理層最終向董事會負責。但是,經理成爲執行董事會成員的情況並不少見,特別是如果他們是創始人或首席執行官。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難要求董事會對決策負責。
Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Sangfor Technologies Inc.. It is very interesting to see that insiders have a meaningful CN¥12b stake in this CN¥26b business. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們的信息表明,內部人士持有Sangfor Technologies Inc.的大量股份。有趣的是,內部人士在這項260元的業務中擁有120元人民幣的大量股份。很高興看到這樣的投資水平。你可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否在買入。
General Public Ownership
普通公有制
With a 39% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Sangfor Technologies. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.
Sangfor Technologies擁有39%的所有權,主要由個人投資者組成的公衆對Sangfor Technologies有一定程度的影響力。這種所有權規模雖然可觀,但如果決策與其他大股東不同步,可能不足以改變公司政策。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Sangfor Technologies (1 can't be ignored) that you should be aware of.
我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們已經確定了Sangfor Technologies的3個警告信號(其中1個不容忽視),你應該注意這些信號。
If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.
如果你像我一樣,你可能需要考慮這家公司是增長還是萎縮。幸運的是,您可以查看這份免費報告,該報告顯示了分析師對其未來的預測。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall ST 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。