Calumet, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CLMT) Market Cap Dropped US$115m Last Week; Individual Investors Who Hold 44% Were Hit as Were Institutions
Calumet, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CLMT) Market Cap Dropped US$115m Last Week; Individual Investors Who Hold 44% Were Hit as Were Institutions
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- The considerable ownership by retail investors in Calumet indicates that they collectively have a greater say in management and business strategy
- 50% of the business is held by the top 20 shareholders
- Insiders have sold recently
- 散戶投資者在Calumet的巨大持股表明,他們在管理和業務策略上有更大的發言權。
- 前20名股東持有50%的業務
- 內部人士最近出售了股票。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Calumet, Inc. (NASDAQ:CLMT), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 44% to be precise, is retail investors. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制Calumet, Inc. (納斯達克:CLMT),首先需要理解該業務的股權結構。持有公司最多股份的群體,大約佔44%,是散戶投資者。也就是說,如果股票上漲,他們將獲得最大的收益(如果出現下跌,他們將損失最多)。
While institutions who own 24% came under pressure after market cap dropped to US$1.8b last week,retail investors took the most losses.
雖然擁有24%的機構在市值上週降至18億美元后受到壓力,但零售投資者遭受了最大損失。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Calumet.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於卡盧美特的信息。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Calumet?
機構所有權告訴我們關於卡盧美特的信息是什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構通常在向自己的投資者報告時,會與基準進行比較,因此一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常對該股票會更加熱情。我們預期大多數公司在登記時都會有一些機構,尤其是當它們正在增長時。
We can see that Calumet does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Calumet, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到卡盧美特確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司股票的一部分。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師對該股票進行了研究並且看好它。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能是錯誤的。如果兩家大型機構投資者試圖同時出售某隻股票,股價大幅下跌並不少見。因此,查看卡盧美特過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

Our data indicates that hedge funds own 5.0% of Calumet. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is The Heritage Group with 16% of shares outstanding. With 8.1% and 6.1% of the shares outstanding respectively, Wasserstein & Co., L.P. and Adams Asset Advisors LLC are the second and third largest shareholders.
我們的數據表明,對沖基金持有Calumet 5.0%的股份。這很有趣,因爲對沖基金通常相當活躍且具有激進性。許多基金尋找能夠推動股價上漲的中期催化劑。根據我們的數據,我們可以看到,最大的股東是The Heritage Group,持有16%的流通股份。Wasserstein & Co., L.P.和Adams Asset Advisors LLC分別持有8.1%和6.1%的流通股份,位列第二和第三大股東。
Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 20 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.
從股東登記冊中,我們可以看到前20名股東控制了50%的持股,這意味着沒有單一股東擁有多數的持股權。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
研究機構的所有權是評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。分析師情緒的研究也可以達到同樣的效果。有很多分析師在覆蓋該股票,因此查看他們的預期可能也是值得的。
Insider Ownership Of Calumet
Calumet的內部持股情況
The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
內部人的定義在不同國家之間可能略有不同,但董事會成員總是算作內部人。公司管理層負責運營業務,但首席執行官將向董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會的成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部人擁有股份是一件好事。然而,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難讓董事會對決策負責。
We can report that insiders do own shares in Calumet, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$50m worth of shares (at current prices). It is good to see this level of investment by insiders. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.
我們可以報告,內部人士確實持有Calumet, Inc.的股票。這是一家大公司,因此看到這樣的對齊程度是很好的。內部人士持有價值5000萬美元的股票(按當前價格計算)。看到內部人士進行這樣的投資是件好事。您可以在這裏查看這些內部人士最近是否有在買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 44% stake in Calumet. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
一般公衆,通常是個人投資者,持有Calumet 44%的股份。雖然這一群體不一定能夠決定一切,但它確實可以對公司的運行產生實際影響。
Private Equity Ownership
股權投資公司持有8.8%的股份,有能力參與塑造以價值創造爲重點的公司策略。一些投資者可能會因此而受到鼓舞,因爲股權投資公司有時可以鼓勵市場看到公司的價值,從而採取有益的策略。另外,那些持有者可能在將其上市後退出投資。
With an ownership of 8.1%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some might like this, because private equity are sometimes activists who hold management accountable. But other times, private equity is selling out, having taking the company public.
憑藉8.1%的股權,股權投資公司有能力在價值創造的基礎上參與塑造企業的策略。有些人可能會喜歡這樣,因爲股權投資有時是激進派,要求管理層負責。但有時,股權投資會選擇退出,將公司公開上市。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
It seems that Private Companies own 16%, of the Calumet stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.
看起來,私營公司持有Calumet股票的16%。私營公司可能是相關方。有時內部人士是通過持有私營公司的股份,而非以個人身份,來對一家上市公司產生利益。雖然很難得出任何廣泛的結論,但值得注意的是,這是進一步研究的一個領域。
Next Steps:
下一步:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Take risks for example - Calumet has 4 warning signs (and 1 which makes us a bit uncomfortable) we think you should know about.
我覺得研究一個公司的具體所有者非常有趣。但要真正獲得洞察,我們還需要考慮其他信息。以風險爲例——Calumet有4個警告信號(還有1個讓我們感到不安的信號),我們認爲你應該了解這些。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。