Institutional Investors Are Similarweb Ltd.'s (NYSE:SMWB) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$61m Market Cap Gain
Institutional Investors Are Similarweb Ltd.'s (NYSE:SMWB) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$61m Market Cap Gain
Key Insights
關鍵見解
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Similarweb's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- A total of 5 investors have a majority stake in the company with 53% ownership
- Insider ownership in Similarweb is 25%
- 高機構所有權意味着Similarweb的股價對其交易行爲很敏感
- 共有5名投資者持有該公司的多數股權,所有權爲53%
- Similarweb 的內部所有權爲 25%
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Similarweb Ltd. (NYSE:SMWB), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 35% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).
要了解誰真正控制了Similarweb Ltd.(紐約證券交易所代碼:SMWB),了解業務的所有權結構非常重要。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有35%所有權的機構。也就是說,如果股票上漲,該集團將受益最大(如果出現低迷,則損失最大)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$1.0b in market cap. The gains from last week would have further boosted the one-year return to shareholders which currently stand at 164%.
上週,在該公司的市值達到10億美元之後,機構投資者最終受益最大。上週的漲勢將進一步提振目前爲164%的股東一年回報率。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Similarweb.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東能告訴我們關於Similarweb的什麼。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Similarweb?
關於Similarweb,機構所有權告訴我們什麼?
Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.
機構在向自己的投資者報告時通常會根據基準來衡量自己,因此,一旦股票被納入主要指數,他們通常會變得更加熱情。我們預計大多數公司都會註冊一些機構,尤其是在它們成長的情況下。
We can see that Similarweb does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Similarweb's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.
我們可以看到,Similarweb確實有機構投資者;他們持有該公司很大一部分股票。這表明專業投資者有一定的信譽。但是我們不能僅僅依靠這一事實,因爲機構有時會像所有人一樣進行不良投資。當多家機構擁有一隻股票時,總是存在處於 「擁擠交易」 的風險。當這樣的交易出錯時,多方可能會競相快速出售股票。對於沒有增長曆史的公司,這種風險更高。你可以在下面看到Similarweb的歷史收益和收入,但請記住,故事總是有更多內容。
We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Similarweb. The company's largest shareholder is Joshua Alliance, with ownership of 16%. The second and third largest shareholders are Viola Group and Prosus Ventures N.V., with an equal amount of shares to their name at 14%. Furthermore, CEO Or Offer is the owner of 4.8% of the company's shares.
我們注意到,對沖基金沒有對Similarweb進行有意義的投資。該公司的最大股東是約書亞聯盟,所有權爲16%。第二和第三大股東是Viola集團和Prosus Ventures N.V.,持有與其同等數量的股份,爲14%。此外,首席執行官Or Offer持有公司4.8%的股份。
To make our study more interesting, we found that the top 5 shareholders control more than half of the company which implies that this group has considerable sway over the company's decision-making.
爲了使我們的研究更有趣,我們發現前五名股東控制着公司一半以上的股份,這意味着該群體對公司的決策有相當大的影響力。
While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.
雖然研究公司的機構所有權可以爲你的研究增加價值,但研究分析師的建議以更深入地了解股票的預期表現也是一種很好的做法。有很多分析師報道該股,因此可能也值得一看他們的預測。
Insider Ownership Of Similarweb
Similarweb 的內部所有權
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.
儘管內部人員的確切定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員是內部人士。公司管理層經營業務,但首席執行官將對董事會負責,即使他或她是董事會成員。
I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.
我通常認爲內部所有權是一件好事。但是,在某些情況下,這使得其他股東更難要求董事會對決策負責。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Similarweb Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just US$1.0b, and insiders have US$265m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would say this shows a good degree of alignment with shareholders, especially in a company of this size. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人士擁有Similarweb Ltd合理比例的股份。它的市值僅爲10億美元,內部人士以自己的名義持有價值2.65億美元的股票。這非常重要。大多數人會說,這表明了與股東的良好一致性,尤其是在如此規模的公司中。你可以點擊這裏查看這些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
普通公有制
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.
包括散戶投資者在內的公衆擁有該公司13%的股份,因此不容忽視。儘管這個群體不一定能做主,但它肯定會對公司的運作方式產生真正的影響。
Private Equity Ownership
私募股權所有權
With an ownership of 27%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.
私募股權公司擁有27%的所有權,可以在制定以價值創造爲重點的公司戰略方面發揮作用。一些投資者可能會爲此感到鼓舞,因爲私募股權有時能夠鼓勵制定有助於市場看到公司價值的策略。或者,這些持有人可能會在投資上市後退出投資。
Next Steps:
後續步驟:
I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 1 warning sign for Similarweb that you should be aware of before investing here.
我覺得看看究竟誰擁有一家公司非常有趣。但是,要真正獲得見解,我們還需要考慮其他信息。例如,我們發現了Similarweb的1個警告信號,在這裏投資之前你應該注意這個信號。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果你想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,千萬不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是使用過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,這些數據是指截至財務報表日期當月最後日期的12個月期間。這可能與全年年度報告數據不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall St 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。