Institutional Investors Are Cantaloupe, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CTLP) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$73m Market Cap Gain
Institutional Investors Are Cantaloupe, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:CTLP) Biggest Bettors and Were Rewarded After Last Week's US$73m Market Cap Gain
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significantly high institutional ownership implies Cantaloupe's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions
- The top 9 shareholders own 52% of the company
- Insiders have bought recently
- 顯著較高的機構持股意味着Cantaloupe的股價對他們的交易行爲非常敏感。
- 前9大股東持有公司52%的股份。
- 內部人士最近進行了買入。
If you want to know who really controls Cantaloupe, Inc. (NASDAQ:CTLP), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 57% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).
如果你想知道誰真正控制Cantaloupe, Inc. (納斯達克:CTLP),那麼你需要查看其股東登記的組成。機構持有57%的股份,是公司最大的股東。換句話說,這個群體面臨着最大的上行潛力(或下行風險)。
And last week, institutional investors ended up benefitting the most after the company hit US$675m in market cap. The one-year return on investment is currently 43% and last week's gain would have been more than welcomed.
上週,機構投資者在公司市值達到67500萬美元后獲益最多。目前一年的投資回報率爲43%,上週的收益本可以得到更多的歡迎。
In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Cantaloupe.
在下圖中,我們深入研究了Cantaloupe不同的股權結構。
What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cantaloupe?
機構持股對Cantaloupe的意義是什麼?
Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.
機構投資者通常將自己的回報與一個常見的指數回報進行比較。因此,他們通常會考慮購買納入相關基準指數的大型公司股票。
Cantaloupe already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. If multiple institutions change their view on a stock at the same time, you could see the share price drop fast. It's therefore worth looking at Cantaloupe's earnings history below. Of course, the future is what really matters.
Cantaloupe已經在股東名冊上有機構存在。實際上,他們在公司中擁有相當可觀的股份。這意味着爲這些機構工作的分析師們對這隻股票進行了研究,並且他們喜歡這隻股票。但和其他人一樣,他們也可能會出錯。如果多個機構同時改變了對一隻股票的看法,你可能會看到股價迅速下跌。因此,值得查看下面Cantaloupe的盈利歷史。當然,未來才是最重要的。
Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 23% of Cantaloupe. That worth noting, since hedge funds are often quite active investors, who may try to influence management. Many want to see value creation (and a higher share price) in the short term or medium term. Our data shows that Hudson Executive Capital LP is the largest shareholder with 13% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 9.8% and 6.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.
由於機構投資者擁有超過一半的已發行股票,董事會可能需要關注他們的偏好。我們的數據顯示對沖基金擁有23%的Cantaloupe。這一事實值得注意,因爲對沖基金通常是相當活躍的投資者,可能會試圖影響管理層。許多人希望在短期或中期看到價值創造(和更高的股價)。我們的數據顯示Hudson Executive Capital LP是最大股東,持有13%的流通股。與此同時,第二和第三大股東分別持有9.8%和6.1%的流通股。
We also observed that the top 9 shareholders account for more than half of the share register, with a few smaller shareholders to balance the interests of the larger ones to a certain extent.
我們還觀察到,排名前9的股東佔據了股東名冊的過半數,少數小股東在一定程度上平衡了大股東的利益。
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.
研究機構的持有情況是判斷和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現同樣的目的。目前有合理數量的分析師在覆蓋此股票,因此了解他們對未來的整體看法可能會有用。
Insider Ownership Of Cantaloupe
Cantaloupe的內部人持股情況
The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.
公司內部人士的定義可能是主觀的,並在不同法域之間有所不同。我們的數據顯示個人內部人士,至少捕獲了董事會成員。公司管理層對董事會負責,後者應代表股東的利益。值得注意的是,有時高層管理人員本身就是董事會成員。
Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.
大多數人認爲內部持股是積極的,因爲這表明董事會與其他股東保持良好的一致性。然而,在某些情況下,權力在這個群體中過於集中。
Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Cantaloupe, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$675m, and insiders have US$65m worth of shares, in their own names. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.
我們最新的數據表明,內部人士在Cantaloupe, Inc.擁有一些股份。其市值僅爲67500萬美元,內部人士名下的股份價值6500萬美元。看到內部人士的投資是件好事,但值得檢查一下這些內部人士是否有在買入。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
With a 11% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Cantaloupe. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆持有11%的股份,主要由散戶投資者組成,對Cantaloupe有一定的影響力。儘管這種持股比例可能不足以影響他們有利的政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Next Steps:
下一步:
It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Cantaloupe better, we need to consider many other factors.
始終值得思考擁有公司股票的不同群體。但是要更好地理解Cantaloupe,我們需要考慮許多其他因素。
I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.
我喜歡深入了解一家公司過去的表現。您可以免費訪問這張互動圖表,查看過去的盈利、營業收入和現金流。
But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.
但最終,決定這個業務的所有者表現如何的,是未來而不是過去。因此,我們認爲查看這份免費的報告是明智的,報告顯示分析師是否預測了一個更光明的未來。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。