Does Ingevity (NYSE:NGVT) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Does Ingevity (NYSE:NGVT) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet?
Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' When we think about how risky a company is, we always like to look at its use of debt, since debt overload can lead to ruin. Importantly, Ingevity Corporation (NYSE:NGVT) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?
霍華德·馬克斯說得好,他說的不是擔心股價的波動,而是 「永久損失的可能性是我擔心的風險... 也是我認識的每位實際投資者所擔心的風險。」當我們思考一家公司的風險有多大時,我們總是喜歡考慮其債務的用途,因爲債務過載可能導致破產。重要的是,英吉維蒂公司(紐約證券交易所代碼:NGVT)確實有債務。但更重要的問題是:這筆債務會帶來多大的風險?
When Is Debt A Problem?
債務何時成爲問題?
Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. Part and parcel of capitalism is the process of 'creative destruction' where failed businesses are mercilessly liquidated by their bankers. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. By replacing dilution, though, debt can be an extremely good tool for businesses that need capital to invest in growth at high rates of return. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together.
當企業無法通過自由現金流或以誘人的價格籌集資金來輕鬆履行這些義務時,債務和其他負債就會成爲風險。資本主義的組成部分是 「創造性破壞」 過程,在這種過程中,倒閉的企業被銀行家無情地清算。儘管這種情況並不常見,但我們經常會看到負債公司永久稀釋股東,因爲貸款人迫使他們以不良价格籌集資金。但是,通過取代稀釋,對於需要資本以高回報率投資增長的企業來說,債務可以成爲一個非常好的工具。在考慮企業使用多少債務時,要做的第一件事是同時考慮其現金和債務。
What Is Ingevity's Net Debt?
Ingevity 的淨負債是多少?
As you can see below, Ingevity had US$1.40b of debt, at September 2024, which is about the same as the year before. You can click the chart for greater detail. However, it also had US$135.5m in cash, and so its net debt is US$1.26b.
如下所示,截至2024年9月,Ingevity有14.0億美元的債務,與前一年大致相同。您可以單擊圖表以獲取更多詳細信息。但是,它也有1.355億美元的現金,因此其淨負債爲12.6億美元。
A Look At Ingevity's Liabilities
看看 Ingevity 的負債
We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Ingevity had liabilities of US$360.8m falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$1.64b due beyond that. On the other hand, it had cash of US$135.5m and US$197.4m worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling US$1.66b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.
我們可以從最新的資產負債表中看出,Ingevity的負債爲3.608億美元,一年後到期的負債爲16.4億美元。另一方面,它有一年內到期的現金爲1.355億美元,還有價值1.974億美元的應收賬款。因此,它的負債總額比其現金和短期應收賬款的總和多出16.6億美元。
This is a mountain of leverage relative to its market capitalization of US$1.67b. This suggests shareholders would be heavily diluted if the company needed to shore up its balance sheet in a hurry.
相對於其16.7億美元的市值,這是一座巨大的槓桿率。這表明,如果公司需要迅速支撐資產負債表,股東將被嚴重稀釋。
We use two main ratios to inform us about debt levels relative to earnings. The first is net debt divided by earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA), while the second is how many times its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) covers its interest expense (or its interest cover, for short). The advantage of this approach is that we take into account both the absolute quantum of debt (with net debt to EBITDA) and the actual interest expenses associated with that debt (with its interest cover ratio).
我們使用兩個主要比率來告知我們債務水平與收益的關係。第一個是淨負債除以扣除利息、稅項、折舊和攤銷前的收益(EBITDA),第二個是其利息和稅前收益(EBIT)抵消利息支出(或簡稱利息保障)的多少倍。這種方法的優勢在於,我們既考慮了債務的絕對數量(淨負債佔息稅折舊攤銷前利潤),也考慮了與該債務相關的實際利息支出(及其利息覆蓋率)。
Ingevity's debt is 3.7 times its EBITDA, and its EBIT cover its interest expense 2.6 times over. This suggests that while the debt levels are significant, we'd stop short of calling them problematic. Worse, Ingevity's EBIT was down 20% over the last year. If earnings continue to follow that trajectory, paying off that debt load will be harder than convincing us to run a marathon in the rain. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately the future profitability of the business will decide if Ingevity can strengthen its balance sheet over time. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.
Ingevity的債務是其息稅折舊攤銷前利潤的3.7倍,其息稅前利潤可支付其利息支出的2.6倍。這表明,儘管債務水平很高,但我們不會稱其爲有問題。更糟糕的是,Ingevity的息稅前利潤比去年下降了20%。如果收益繼續保持這一軌跡,那麼償還債務負擔將比說服我們在雨中跑一場馬拉松更難。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但最終,該業務未來的盈利能力將決定Ingevity能否隨着時間的推移加強其資產負債表。因此,如果您專注於未來,可以查看這份顯示分析師利潤預測的免費報告。
Finally, a business needs free cash flow to pay off debt; accounting profits just don't cut it. So we clearly need to look at whether that EBIT is leading to corresponding free cash flow. In the last three years, Ingevity's free cash flow amounted to 36% of its EBIT, less than we'd expect. That weak cash conversion makes it more difficult to handle indebtedness.
最後,企業需要自由現金流來償還債務;會計利潤根本無法減少債務。因此,我們顯然需要研究該息稅前利潤是否會帶來相應的自由現金流。在過去三年中,Ingevity的自由現金流佔其息稅前利潤的36%,低於我們的預期。這種疲軟的現金轉換使得處理債務變得更加困難。
Our View
我們的觀點
We'd go so far as to say Ingevity's EBIT growth rate was disappointing. Having said that, its ability to convert EBIT to free cash flow isn't such a worry. Overall, it seems to us that Ingevity's balance sheet is really quite a risk to the business. So we're almost as wary of this stock as a hungry kitten is about falling into its owner's fish pond: once bitten, twice shy, as they say. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. But ultimately, every company can contain risks that exist outside of the balance sheet. Be aware that Ingevity is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...
我們甚至可以說Ingevity的息稅前利潤增長率令人失望。話雖如此,它能夠將息稅前利潤轉換爲自由現金流並不令人擔憂。總的來說,在我們看來,Ingevity的資產負債表對業務來說確實是一個很大的風險。因此,我們對這隻魚的警惕幾乎就像一隻飢餓的小貓要掉進主人的魚池一樣警惕:正如他們所說,一旦被咬傷,兩次害羞。在分析債務水平時,資產負債表是顯而易見的起點。但歸根結底,每家公司都可以控制資產負債表之外存在的風險。請注意,Ingevity在我們的投資分析中顯示了1個警告信號,你應該知道...
At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.
歸根結底,通常最好專注於沒有淨負債的公司。您可以訪問我們的此類公司的特別名單(所有公司都有利潤增長的記錄)。它是免費的。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對這篇文章有反饋嗎?擔心內容嗎?直接聯繫我們。或者,發送電子郵件給編輯組(網址爲)simplywallst.com。
Simply Wall ST 的這篇文章本質上是籠統的。我們僅使用公正的方法提供基於歷史數據和分析師預測的評論,我們的文章並非旨在提供財務建議。它不構成買入或賣出任何股票的建議,也沒有考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們的目標是爲您提供由基本數據驅動的長期重點分析。請注意,我們的分析可能不會考慮最新的價格敏感型公司公告或定性材料。華爾街只是沒有持有上述任何股票的頭寸。