Private Companies Among Shenzhen Colibri Technologies Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002957) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 5.9% Price Drop
Private Companies Among Shenzhen Colibri Technologies Co., Ltd.'s (SZSE:002957) Largest Stockholders and Were Hit After Last Week's 5.9% Price Drop
Key Insights
關鍵洞察
- Significant control over Shenzhen Colibri Technologies by private companies implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions
- 56% of the business is held by the top 2 shareholders
- Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company
- 私人公司對科瑞技術的重大控制意味着公衆具有更多的權力來影響管理和治理相關的決策。
- 前兩大股東持有該業務的56%。
- 通過公司的過去業績數據和股權研究,可以更好地評估公司的未來表現。
To get a sense of who is truly in control of Shenzhen Colibri Technologies Co., Ltd. (SZSE:002957), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are private companies with 58% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.
要了解誰真正控制了科瑞技術有限公司(深交所:002957),了解業務的所有權結構是很重要的。而持有最大份額的集團是擁有58%股份的私人公司。換句話說,這個集團在對公司的投資中能夠獲得最多的收益(或遭受最多的損失)。
As market cap fell to CN¥6.6b last week, private companies would have faced the highest losses than any other shareholder groups of the company.
上週市場市值下降至66億人民幣,私人公司所面臨的損失將比該公司的其他股東群體更大。
Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Shenzhen Colibri Technologies.
讓我們仔細看看不同類型的股東可以告訴我們關於科瑞技術的情況。

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Shenzhen Colibri Technologies?
機構持股告訴我們關於科瑞技術什麼?
Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.
許多機構的表現與近似當地市場的指數進行比較。因此,他們通常更加關注那些被納入主要指數的公司。
We can see that Shenzhen Colibri Technologies does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Shenzhen Colibri Technologies, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.
我們可以看到科瑞技術確實有機構投資者,他們持有公司相當一部分的股票。這表明在專業投資者中有一定的信譽。但我們不能僅僅依賴這一事實,因爲機構有時也會進行錯誤的投資,就像其他人一樣。如果兩位大型機構投資者同時試圖拋售股票,股票價格出現大幅下跌並不罕見。因此,查看科瑞技術過去的盈利軌跡是值得的(見下文)。當然,也請記住還有其他因素需要考慮。

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Shenzhen Colibri Technologies. The company's largest shareholder is Colibri Technologies Pte Ltd, with ownership of 39%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 17% and 8.2% of the stock. Shaodong Peng, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Vice Chairman.
我們注意到對科瑞技術的對沖基金沒有實質性投資。 公司的最大股東是Colibri Technologies Pte Ltd,擁有39%的股份。 相比之下,第二和第三大股東分別持有約17%和8.2%的股票。 第三大股東Shaodong Peng同時也擔任副董事長。
A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 2 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 56% stake.
對股東登記的更詳細研究向我們展示了前兩位股東通過其56%的持股比例在公司中擁有相當的 ownership.
Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.
研究機構的持股是評估和篩選股票預期表現的好方法。通過研究分析師的情緒也可以實現相同的目標。這隻股票有一些分析師的覆蓋,但隨着時間的發展,它仍然有可能變得更加知名。
Insider Ownership Of Shenzhen Colibri Technologies
科瑞技術的內部持股情況
While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.
雖然內部人的精確定義可能是主觀的,但幾乎所有人都認爲董事會成員都是內部人。管理層最終要向董事會負責。然而,管理者成爲執行董事會成員並不罕見,尤其是在他們是創始人或首席執行官的情況下。
Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.
當內部持股顯示領導層像真正的公司所有者一樣思考時,這是積極的。然而,高比例的內部持股也可能給予公司內部小團體巨大的權力。在某些情況下,這可能是負面的。
We can see that insiders own shares in Shenzhen Colibri Technologies Co., Ltd.. It has a market capitalization of just CN¥6.6b, and insiders have CN¥554m worth of shares, in their own names. This shows at least some alignment. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.
我們可以看到內部人士持有科瑞技術有限公司的股份。它的市值僅爲66億人民幣,內部人士擁有價值55400萬人民幣的股份。在他們自己的名字下。這顯示至少有一些一致性。您可以點擊這裏查看那些內部人士是否在買入或賣出。
General Public Ownership
公衆持股
The general public-- including retail investors -- own 26% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.
公衆——包括零售投資者——在公司擁有26%的股份,因此他們的存在不可忽視。雖然這種所有權的規模可能不足以左右政策決定,但他們仍然可以對公司政策產生集體影響。
Private Company Ownership
私有公司所有權
Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 58%, of the company's shares. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.
我們的數據顯示,私有公司持有該公司58%的股份。單憑這一事實很難得出任何結論,因此值得深入了解那些私有公司的擁有者。有時,內部人士或其他相關方通過單獨的私有公司對上市公司的股份有興趣。
Next Steps:
下一步:
While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For example, we've discovered 2 warning signs for Shenzhen Colibri Technologies that you should be aware of before investing here.
雖然考慮擁有一家公司不同群體是值得的,但還有其他更重要的因素。例如,我們發現科瑞技術有2個警告信號,你在這裏投資前應該了解這些。
If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.
如果您想了解分析師對未來增長的預測,請不要錯過這份關於分析師預測的免費報告。
NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
注意:本文中的數字是根據過去十二個月的數據計算得出的,指的是截至財務報表日期的月份最後一天的12個月期間。這可能與完整年度的年報數字不一致。
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.
This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
對本文有反饋?對內容有疑慮?請直接與我們聯繫。或者,發送電子郵件至 editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com。
這篇來自Simply Wall ST的文章是一般性的。我們根據歷史數據和分析師預測提供評論,採用無偏見的方法,我們的文章並不旨在提供財務建議。它不構成對任何股票的買入或賣出建議,也未考慮到您的目標或財務狀況。我們旨在爲您提供以基本數據驅動的長期分析。請注意,我們的分析可能未考慮最新的價格敏感公司公告或定性材料。Simply Wall ST在提到的任何股票中均沒有持倉。